Discontinuities in the Lagrangian formulation of the kinematic wave model

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 34, Issue , 2013, Pages 148-161

  Van Wageningen Kessels, Femke ^a   Yuan, Yufei ^b   Hoogendoorn, Serge P ^a   Van Lint, Hans ^a   Vuik, Kees ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c Mathematics and Computer Science ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Boundaries; Continuum models; Discretization; Lagrangian formulation; Networks; Nonhomogeneous roads; Ramps; Traffic flow

Indexed keywords

CONTINUUM MECHANICS; KINEMATICS; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); SEMICONDUCTOR INSULATOR BOUNDARIES;

CONTINUUM MODEL; DISCRETIZATIONS; LAGRANGIAN FORMULATIONS; NON-HOMOGENEOUS; RAMPS; TRAFFIC FLOW;

LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS;

CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DISCONTINUITY; KINEMATICS; LAGRANGIAN ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; WAVE MODELING;

EID: 84880331315     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bar-Gera H., Ahn S. Empirical macroscopic evaluation of freeway merge-ratios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2010, 18(4):457-470.
2. Bourrel E., Lesort J.-B. Mixing microscopic and macroscopic representations of traffic flow hybrid model based on Lighthill-Whitham-Richards theory. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2007, 1852:193-200.
3. Burghout W., Koutsopoulos H., Andréasson I. Hybrid mesoscopic-microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2005, 1934:218-225.
4. Cassidy M., Ahn S. Driver turn-taking behavior in congested freeway merges. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2005, 1934:140-147.
5. Chevallier E., Leclercq L. Do microscopic merging models reproduce the observed priority sharing ratio in congestion?. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2009, 17(3):328-336.
6. Courant R., Friedrichs K., Lewy H. On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM Journal 1967, 215-234.
7. Daganzo C. A variational formulation of kinematic waves: I. Basic theory and complex boundary conditions and II. Solution methods. Transportation Research Part B 2005, 39:187-196. (934-950).
8. Daganzo C.F. The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1995, 29(2):79-93.
9. Helbing D., Treiber M. Numerical simulation of macroscopic traffic equations. Computing in Science and Engineering 1999, 1(5):89-99.
10. Jin W.-L., Zhang H.M. The inhomogeneous kinematic wave traffic flow model as a resonant nonlinear system. Transportation Science 2003, 37(3):294-311.
11. Laval J., Leclercq L. Continuum approximation for congestion dynamics along freeway corridors. Transportation Science 2010, 40(1):87-97.
12. Laval J.A., Leclercq L. Microscopic modeling of the relaxation phenomenon using a macroscopic lane-changing model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2008, 42(6):511-522.
13. Lebacque J. The Godunov scheme and what it means for first order traffic flow models. Transportation and Traffic Theory 1996, 647-677. Pergamon. J. Lesort (Ed.).
14. Lebacque J. Intersection modeling, application to macroscopic network traffic flow models and traffic management. Traffic and Granular Flow, vol. 03 2005, 261-278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. S.P. Hoogendoorn, S. Luding, P.H.L. Bovy, M. Schreckenberg, D.E. Wolf (Eds.).
15. Leclercq L. Hybrid approaches to the solutions of the Lighthill-Whitham-Richards" models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2007, 41(7):701-709.
16. Leclercq L., Chanut S., Lesort J.-B. Moving bottlenecks in Lighthill-Whitham-Richards model: a unified theory. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2004, 1883:3-13.
17. Leclercq L., Laval J., Chevallier E. The Lagrangian coordinates and what it means for first order traffic flow models. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2007, 735-753. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. R. Allsop, M. Bell, B. Heydecker (Eds.).
18. Lighthill M.J., Whitham G.B. On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1955, 229(1178):317-345.
19. Newell G. A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic (part I-III). Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1993, 27(4):281-313.
20. Newell G.F. A moving bottleneck. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1998, 32(8):531-537.
21. Ni D., Leonard J. A simplified kinematic wave model at a merge bottleneck. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2005, 29(11):1054-1072.
22. Ni D., Leonard Il J., Williams B. The network kinematic waves model: a simplified approach to network traffic. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations 2006, 10:1-14.
23. Richards P.I. Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 1956, 4(1):42-51.
24. Van Wageningen-Kessels F., Van Lint J., Hoogendoorn S., Vuik C. Lagrangian formulation of a multi-class kinematic wave model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2010, 2188:29-36.
25. Yuan, Y., Van Lint, H., van Wageningen-Kessels, F., Hoogendoorn, S., 2011. Lagrangian traffic state estimation for freeway networks. In: 2nd International Conference on Models and Technologies for ITS.
26. Yuan, Y., Van Lint, J., Wilson, R., van Wageningen-Kessels, F., Hoogendoorn, S., submitted for publication. Real-time lagrangian traffic state estimator for freeways. IEEE ITS Transactions.