Adding coping-related strategies to biomedical argumentation in computer-generated genetic counseling patient letters

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 149-152

  Green, Nancy L ^a   Stadler, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Artificial intelligence; Coping; Evidence based medicine; Genetic counseling patient letters

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COPING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOLUNTEER;

ARGUMENTATION; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COPING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GENETIC COUNSELING PATIENT LETTERS;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CORRESPONDENCE AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84880326937     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baker D.L., Eash T., Schuette J.L., Uhlmann W.R. Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Genet Counsel 2002, 11:399-418.
2. Jenicek M., Hitchcock D.L. Evidence-based practice: logic, critical thinking in medicine 2004, American Medical Association Press, Chicago, IL.
3. Green N., Dwight R., Navoraphan K., Stadler B. Natural language generation of transparent arguments for lay audiences. Arg Comp 2011, 2:23-50.
4. Green N. A Bayesian network coding scheme for annotating biomedical information presented to genetic counseling clients. J Biomed Inform 2005, 38:130-144.
5. Genetic Counseling: Psychological Dimensions 1979, Academic Press, New York. S. Kessler (Ed.).
6. Toulmin S.E. The uses of argument 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Walton D., Reed C., Macagno F. Argumentation schemes 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Pichert J.W., Elam P. Guilt and shame in therapeutic relationships. Patient Educ Couns 1986, 8:359-365.
9. Cawsey A., Grasso F., Paris C. Adaptive information for consumers of healthcare. The adaptive web, LNCS 4321 2007, 465-484. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, W. Nejdl (Eds.).
10. Rich E. User modeling via stereotypes. Cogn Sci 1979, 3:329-354.
11. Fagerlin A., Zikmund-Fisher B.J., Ubel P.A., Jankovic A., Derry H.A., Smith D.M. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS). Med Decis Making 2007, 27:672-680.
12. Thompson E.R. Development, validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). J Cross Cult Psychol 2007, 38:227-242.