Intervention with feedback using Outcome Questionnaire 45 (OQ-45) in a Swedish psychiatric outpatient population. A randomized controlled trial

Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 274-281

  Hansson, Helena ^a   Rundberg, Jenny ^a   Österling, Agneta ^b   Öjehagen, Agneta ^a   Berglund, Mats ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Swedish Social Insurance Agency   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Feedback; Intervention; Outcome Questionnaire 45 (OQ 45); Psychiatric outpatient population; Psychiatric treatment; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALERTNESS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL PATIENT; OUTPATIENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SWEDEN; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880322343     PISSN: 08039488     EISSN: 15024725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2012.736534     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. World Health Organization. Gender and Women s Health; 2009. Available from http://www.who.int/mental-health/prevention/ genderwomen/en/. Accessed 3 January 2012
2. Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer f Ör v Å rd vid depression och Å ngestsyndrom Socialstyrelsen, 2010-3-4. Available from http:// www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2010/2010-3-4. Accessed 20 February 2012. [National Board of Health and Welfare. National Guidelines for Care in Cases of Depression and Anxiety Disorders. National Board of Health and Welfare, 2010. Abstract in English available from http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/ nationalguidelines/nationalguidelinesforcareincasesofde pressionandanxietydisorders. Accessed 20 February 2012
3. Hiller W, Schindler AC, Lambert MJ. Defi ning response and remission in psychotherapy research: A comparison of the RCI and the method of percent improvement. Psychother Res 2011; Sep 23 [Epub ahead of print].
4. Lambert MJ. Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: Introduction to the special section on patient-focused research. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001 ; 69 : 147-9
5. Lambert MJ, Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2011 ; 48 : 72-9
6. Lambert MJ. Bergin and Garfield s handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change. New York: Wiley; 2004
7. Beutler LE, Malik M, Alimohamed S, Harwood TM, Talebi H, Noble S, et al. Therapist variables. In: Lambert MJ (ed.) Bergin and Garfield s handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change. New York: Wiley; 2004. p. 227-306
8. Shimokawa K, Lambert MJ, Smart, DW. Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Metaanalytic and mega-Analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010 ; 78 : 298-311
9. Lambert M J, Whipple JL, Smart DW, Vermeersch DA., Nielsen SL, & Hawkins EJ. The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychother Res 2001 ; 11 : 49-68
10. Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Vermeersch DA, Smart DW, Hawkins EJ, Nielsen SL, et al. Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on patient progress: A replication. Clin Psychol Psychother 2002 ; 9 : 91-103
11. Whipple JL, Lambert MJ, Vermeersch DA, Smart DW, Nielsen SL, Hawkins EJ. Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identifi cation of treatment failure and problem solving strategies in routine practice. J Couns Psychol 2003 ; 58 : 59-68
12. Hawkins EJ, Lambert MJ, Vermeersch D, Slade K, Tuttle K. The effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychother Res 2004 ; 31 : 308-27
13. Harmon SC, Lambert M J, Smart DM, Hawkins E, Nielsen SL, Slade K, & Lutz W. Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychother Res 2007 ; 17 : 379-392
14. Slade K, Lambert MJ, Harmon SC, Smart DW, Bailey R. Improving psychotherapy outcome: The use of immediate electronic feedback and revised clinical support tools. Clin Psychol Psychother 2008 ; 15 : 287-303
15. Lambert MJ, Hansen NB, Umphress V, Lunnen K, Okiishi J, Burlingame G, et al. Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45 .2). Wilmington, DL: American Professional Credentialing Services; 1996
16. Howard KI, Moras K, Brill PS, Martinovich Z, Lutz W. Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. Am Psychol 1996 ; 51 : 1059-64
17. Hansson H, Rundberg J, Berglund M, Öjehagen A, Andersson S-E, Österling A, et al. Feedback for Change. Quality assurance of treatment in psychiatry through a feedback model with integrated alert functionality. Report from a Sk Å ne County Council cooperation project, 2009
18. OQ Measures. Administration and Scoring Manual. OQ 45.2. Outcome Questionnaire. Salt Lake City, USA; 2004
19. Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM, Unphress V, Hansen NB, Vermeersch DA, Clouse, GC, et al. The reliability and validity of the outcome questionnaire. Clin Psychol Psychother 1996 ; 3 : 249-58
20. Wennberg P, Philips B, de Jong K. The Swedish version of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45): Reliability and factor structure in a substance abuse sample. Psychol Psychother 2010 ; 83 (Pt3) : 325-9
21. N orusis R L. S PSS 7. 0 -14.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc; 2004
22. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall /CRC; 1990
23. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow-up measurements. BMJ 2001 ; 323 : 1123-4
24. Schultz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2010 ; 1 : 100-7
25. Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. Using clinical signifi cance in psychotherapy outcome research: The need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychother Res 2009 ; 19 : 493-501
26. Lo Coco G, Chiappelli M, Bensi L, Gullo S, Claudia Prestano, Lambert M. The Factorial structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45: A study with an Italian sample. Clin Psychol Psychother 2008 ; 15 : 418-23