Geographically weighted methods for estimating local surfaces of overall, user and producer accuracies

Remote Sensing Letters

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 373-380

  Comber, Alexis J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RESOLUTION;

ACCURACY MEASURES; CONFUSION MATRICES; GENERIC APPROACH; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; KERNEL BASED APPROACH; REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATIONS; WEIGHTED METHOD;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84880299990     PISSN: 2150704X     EISSN: 21507058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2012.736694     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BRUNSDON, C.F., FOTHERINGHAM, A.S. and CHARLTON, M., 1996, Geographically weighted regression - a method for exploring spatial non-stationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28, pp. 281-298.
2. CAMPBELL, J., 1981, Spatial correlation effects upon accuracy of supervised classification of land cover. Photogrammetric Engineering of Remote Sensing, 47, pp. 355-364.
3. CANTERS, F., 1997, Evaluating the uncertainty of area estimates derived from fuzzy land-cover classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, pp. 403-414.
4. COMBER, A., FISHER, P.F., BRUNSDON, C. and KHMAG, A., 2012, Spatial analysis of remote sensing image classification accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 127, pp. 237-246.
5. EASTMAN, J.R., 2009, IDRISI Taiga (Worcester, MA: Clark University).
6. FOODY, G.M., 2002, Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, pp. 185-201.
7. FOODY, G.M., 2005, Local characterization of thematic classification accuracy through spatially constrained confusion matrices. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, pp. 1217-1228.
8. FOODY, G.M., 2007, Map comparison in GIS. Progress in Physical Geography, 31, pp. 439-445.
9. FOTHERINGHAM, A.S., BRUNSDON, C. and CHARLTON, M.E., 2002, Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships (Chichester: Wiley).
10. FRIEDL, A.F., MCIVER, D.K., HODGES, J.C.F., ZHANG, X.Y., MUCHONEY, D., STRAHLER, A.H., WOODCOCK, C.E., GOPAL, S., SCHNEIDER, A., COOPER, A., BACCINI, A., GAO, F. and SCHAAF, C., 2002, Global land cover mapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, pp. 287-302.
11. GONZALEZ, P., ASNER, G.P., BATTLES, J.J., LEFSKY, M.A., WARING, K.M. and PALACE, M., 2010, Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, Quick Bird, and field measurements in California. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, pp. 1561-1575.
12. MCGWIRE, K.C. and FISHER, P., 2001, Spatially variable thematic accuracy: beyond the confusion matrix. In Spatial Uncertainty in Ecology: Implications for Remote Sensing and GIS Applications, C.T. Hunsaker, M.F. Goodchild, M.A. Friedl and T.J. Case (Eds.), pp. 308-329 (New York: Springer).
13. STEELE, B.M., WINNE, J.C. and REDMOND, R.L., 1998, Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps. Remote Sensing of Environment, 66, pp. 192-202.
14. STEHMAN, S.V., 2000, Practical implications of design-based sampling inference for thematic map accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 72, pp. 35-45.
15. STEHMAN, S.V., 2009, Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, pp. 5243-5272.
16. STEHMAN, S.V., SOHL, T.L. and LOEVELAND, T.R., 2003, Statistical sampling to characterize recent United States land-cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, pp. 517-529.
17. STEHMAN, S.V., SOHL, T.L. and LOVELAND, T.R., 2005, An evaluation of sampling strategies to improve precision of estimates of gross change in land use and land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, pp. 4941-4957.
18. TOBLER, W.R., 1970, A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, pp. 234-240.