Evaluation of the staging systems for gastric cancer

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 93-105

  Peng, Chun Wei ^a   Wang, Lin Wei ^a   Zeng, Wei Juan ^a   Yang, Xiao Jun ^a   Li, Yan ^a  

^a ZHONGNAN HOSPITAL OF WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

gastric cancer; prognosis; staging system

Indexed keywords

6TH TUMOR NODE METASTASIS STAGING SYSTEM; 7TH TUMOR NODE METASTASIS STAGING SYSTEM; ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYBRID STAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIEL STAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOMACH CANCER; TUMOR RATIO METASTASIS;

GASTRIC CANCER; PROGNOSIS; STAGING SYSTEM;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880297428     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23360     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al.: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
2. Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, et al.: Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 610-618.
3. Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH, et al.: Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 3834-3840.
4. Chen YX, Mou LJ:, A risk score system to preoperatively predict TNM stages in gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol-Canc 2011; 34: 130-134.
5. Denoix PF:, TNM classification. Bull Inst Nat Hyg 1944; 1: 52-82.
6. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton C, et al.: AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2010.
7. Kim DH, Oh CA, Oh SJ, et al.: Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications. J Surg Oncol 2012; 105: 26-30.
8. Fang WL, Huang KH, Chen JH, et al.: Comparison of the survival difference between AJCC 6th and 7th editions for gastric cancer patients. World J Surg 2011; 35: 2723-2729.
9. Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Sakuramoto S, et al.: Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 2361-2365.
10. Bae JM, Kim SW, Song SK:, Evaluation of prognostic values according to the new TNM classification in gastric cancer. J Kor Surg Soc 2011; 80: 23-28.
11. Jung H, Lee HH, Song KY, et al.: Validation of the seventh edition of the american joint committee on cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer. Cancer 2011; 117: 2371-2378.
12. Wang W, Xu DZ, Li YF, et al.: Tumor-ratio-metastasis staging system as an alternative to the 7th edition UICC TNM system in gastric cancer after D2 resection-results of a single-institution study of 1343 Chinese patients. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 2049-2056.
13. Warneke VS, Behrens HM, Hartmann JT, et al.: Cohort study based on the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: Proposal of a new staging system. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2364-2371.
14. Yoon SS:, Staging gastric cancer patients after complete surgical resection: Which system should we use ? Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 2423-2425.
15. TM T, PM G, TR F:, Martingale-based residuals for survival models. Biometrika 1990; 77: 147-160.
16. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL:, X-tile: A new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 7252-7259. (Pubitemid 39487712)
17. Association JGC:, Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 101-112.
18. Rausei S, Dionigi G, Boni L, et al.: How does the 7th TNM edition fit in gastric cancer management ? Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1219-1221.
19. Xiao LB, Yu JX, Wu WH, et al.: Superiority of metastatic lymph node ratio to the 7th edition UICC N staging in gastric cancer. World J Gastroentero 2011; 17: 5123-5130.
20. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, et al.: Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A large-scale feasibility study. Gut 2009; 58: 331-336.
21. Marrelli D, Morgagni P, de Manzoni G, et al.: Prognostic value of the 7th AJCC/UICC TNM classification of noncardia gastric cancer analysis of a large series from specialized western centers. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 486-491.
22. Sun Z, Wang ZN, Zhu Z, et al.: Evaluation of the seventh edition of american joint committee on cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: Results from a chinese monoinstitutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 1918-1927.
23. Chae S, Lee A, Lee JH:, The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: A comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 166-171.
24. Deng JY, Sun D, Pan Y, et al.: Ratio between negative and positive lymph nodes is suitable for evaluation the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with positive node metastasis. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e43925.
25. Saito H, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, et al.: Prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and dissected lymph nodes (n ratio) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97: 132-135. (Pubitemid 351169041)
26. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al.: The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: Results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 543-552. (Pubitemid 46555657)
27. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al.: The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: Validation in a large, multicenter series. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 159-165.
28. Deng J, Liang H, Wang D, et al.: Enhancement the prediction of postoperative survival in gastric cancer by combining the negative lymph node count with ratio between positive and examined lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 1043-1051.
29. Dikken JL, van de Velde CJH, Gonen M, et al.: The New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging System for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 2443-2451.
30. Ueno S, Tanabe G, Sako K, et al.: Discrimination value of the new western prognostic system (CLIP score) for hepatocellular carcinoma in 662 Japanese patients. Cancer of the Liver Italian Program. Hepatology 2001; 34: 529-534. (Pubitemid 32786644)
31. Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Hahn S, et al.: Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification. Cancer 2010; 116: 5592-5598.
32. McGhan LJ, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, et al.: Validation of the updated 7th edition AJCC TNM staging criteria for gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 53-61; discussion 61.
33. Wang W, Sun XW, Li CF, et al.: Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: Results of a Chinese single-institution study of 1,503 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1060-1067.
34. Qiu MZ, Wang ZQ, Zhang DS, et al.: Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1869-1876.