From structure to interpretation: A double-layered annotation for event factuality

2nd Linguistic Annotation Workshop, LAW 2008 - Held in Conjunction with LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-8

  Saurí, Roser ^a   Pustejovsky, James ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIELD POINTS; REAL SITUATION; STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS;

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; DATA MINING; LINGUISTICS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84880288868     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: 86-90.
2. Bergler, S. (1992). Evidential Analysis or Reported Speech. PhD thesis, Brandeis University.
3. Carlson, L., Marcu, D., & Okurowski, M. E. (2002). Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory.
4. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 37-46.
5. de Marneffe, M.-C., MacCartney, B., Grenager, T., Cer, D., Rafferty, A., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Learning to distinguish valid textual entailments. In Second PASCAL RTE Challenge (RTE-2).
6. de Marneffe, M.-C., MacCartney, B., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of LREC 2006.
7. Di Eugenio, B. & Glass, M. (2004). The kappa statistic: A second look. Computational Linguistics, 30.
8. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
9. Hickl, A. & Bensley, J. (2007). A discourse commitmentbased framework for recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing: 171-176.
10. Hooper, J. B. (1975). On assertive predicates. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, IV. New York: Academic Press: 91-124.
11. Horn, L. R. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Karttunen, L. (1970). Implicative verbs. Language, 47, 340-358.
13. Karttunen, L. (1971). Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics, 4, 55-69.
14. Karttunen, L. & Zaenen, A. (2005). Veridicity. In Katz, G., Pustejovsky, J., & Schilder, F. (Eds.), Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany. Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum (IBFI).
15. Kiparsky, P. & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in Linguistics. A Collection of Papers. The Hague: Mouton, 143-173.
16. Lewis, D. (1968). Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 113-126.
17. Light, M., Qiu, X. Y., & Srinivasan, P. (2004). The language of Bioscience: Facts, speculations, and statements in between. In BioLINK 2004: Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies, and Databases: 17-24.
18. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Miltsakaki, E., Prasad, R., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2004). The Penn Discourse Treebank. In Proceedings of LREC 2004.
20. Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1).
22. Pradhan, S., Hovy, E., Marcus, M., Palmer, M., Ramshaw, L., & Weischedel, R. (2007). OntoNotes: A unified relational semantic representation. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.
23. Prasad, R., Dinesh, N., Lee, A., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2007). Attribution and its annotation in the Penn Discourse Treebank. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 47(2).
24. Pustejovsky, J., Hanks, P., Sauŕi, R., See, A., Gaizauskas, R., Setzer, A., Radev, D., Sundheim, B., Day, D., Ferro, L., & Lazo, M. (2003). The TimeBank corpus. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2003, (pp. 647-656).
25. Pustejovsky, J., Knippen, B., Littman, J., & Saurí, R. (2005). Temporal and event information in natural language text. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(2), 123-164.
26. Rubin, V. L. (2007). Stating with certainty or stating with doubt: Intercoder reliability results for manual annotation of epistemically modalized statements. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2007.
27. Saurí, R. (2008). A Factuality Profiler for Eventualities in Text. PhD thesis, Brandeis University.
28. Saurí, R. & Pustejovsky, J. (2007). Determining modality and factuality for text entailment. In Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.
29. Snow, R. & Vanderwende, L. (2006). Effectively using syntax for recognizing false entailment. In HLT-NAACL 2006.
30. Tatu, M. & Moldovan, D. (2005). A semantic approach to recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP: 371-378.
31. Verhagen, M., Stubbs, A., & Pustejovsky, J. (2007). Combining independent syntactic and semantic annotation schemes. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop.
32. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., & Cardie, C. (2005). Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(2), 165-210.
33. Wolf, F. & Gibson, E. (2005). Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based analysis. Computational Linguistics, 31(2), 249-287.