Planning policy, housing density and consumer preferences

Journal of Property Research

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 221-238

  Dunse, Neil ^a   Thanos, Sotirios ^a   Bramley, Glen ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

consumer preference; hedonic pricing; housing density; planning policy; planning practice

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; PLANNING PRACTICE; PRICING POLICY; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

ENGLAND; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84880287806     PISSN: 09599916     EISSN: 14664453     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2013.795992     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Andersson, H., Jonsson, L. and Ögren, M. 2010. Property prices and exposure to multiple noise sources: Hedonic regression with road and railway noise. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45: 73 - 89.
3. Audirac, I. and Zifou, M. 1989. Urban development issues: What is controversial in urban sprawl? An annotated bibliography of often overlooked sources, Gainesville, FL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, College of Business Administration, University of Florida.
4. Barker, K. 2003. Review of housing supply: Interim report - Analysis, London: HMSO.
5. Barker, K. 2004. Review of housing supply: Final report - recommendations, London: HMSO.
6. Barton, H. 2000. Sustainable communities: The potential for eco-neighbourhoods, London: Earthscan.
7. Bramley, G. 2007. The sudden rediscovery of housing supply as a key policy issue. Housing Studies, 22: 221 - 242.
8. Bramley, G., Brown, C., Dempsey, N. and Power, S. 2009. Social sustainability and urban form: Evidence from English cities. Environment & Planning A, 41: 2125 - 2142.
9. Bramley, G. and Power, S. 2009. Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type. Environment & Planning B, 36: 30 - 48.
10. Bridge, G. 2002. The neighbourhood and social networks, CNR Paper 4, School of Policy Studies, Centre for Neighbourhood Research, Bristol: University of Bristol.
11. Bunker, R. 1985. Urban consolidation and Australian cities. Built Environment, 11: 83 - 96.
12. Burton, E. 2000. " The potential of the compact city for promoting social equity ". In Achieving sustainable urban form, Edited by: Williams, K., Burton, L. and Jenks, M. 19 - 29. London: Spon.
13. Calthorpe, P. 1993. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
14. Cheshire, P. and Sheppard, S. 2002. The welfare economics of land use planning. Journal of Urban Economics, 52: 242 - 269.
15. Collie, M. 1990. The case for urban consolidation. Australian Planner, 28: 26 - 33.
16. Communities and Local Government. 2006. Planning policy statement 3: Housing, London: CLG.
17. Communities and Local Government. 2010. Planning policy statement 3: Housing, London: CLG.
18. Congress for the New Urbanism. (2004). Charter of the new urbanism congress of the new urbanism. Chicago, IL: CNU. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from www.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/charter_english1.pdf
19. Day, B., Bateman, I. and Lake, I. 2007. Beyond implicit prices: Recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37: 211 - 232.
20. Department of the Environment. 1992. Planning policy guidance note 3: Housing (PPG3), London: HMSO.
21. Department of the Environment. 1995. Our future homes: Opportunity, choice, responsibility housing white paper, London: HMSO.
22. Department of the Environment and DTP. 1994. Planning policy guidance note 13: Transport (PPG13), London: HMSO.
23. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 1998. Planning for the communities of the future, London: HMSO.
24. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 1999a. Towards an urban renaissance: Final report of the urban task force (The 'Rogers' Report), London: Spon.
25. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 1999b. A better quality of life, London: HMSO.
26. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. 2000. Planning policy guidance note 3: Housing (PPG3), London: HMSO.
27. Diamond, H. and Noonan, P. 1996. Land use in America, Washington, DC: Island Press.
28. Duany, A. and Plater-Zyberk, E. 2001. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream, San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.
29. Dubé, J. and Legros, D. 2011. A spatio-temporal measure of spatial dependence: An example using real estate data. Papers in Regional Science, 92: 19 - 30.
30. Evans, A. 1991. Rabbit hutches on postage stamps: Planning, development and political economy. Urban Studies, 28: 853 - 870.
31. Evans, A. and Unsworth, R. 2012. Housing densities and consumer choice. Urban Studies, 49: 1163 - 1177.
32. Ewing, R. 1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63: 107 - 126.
33. Fellmann, J., Getis, A. and Getis, J. 2003. Human geography: Landscapes of human activities, 7th ed., Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
34. Freeman, L. 2001. The effects of sprawl on neighbourhood social ties. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67: 69 - 77.
35. Glaeser, E., Gyourko, J. and Saiz, A. 2008. Housing supply and housing bubbles. Journal of Urban Economics, 64: 198 - 217.
36. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63: 95 - 106.
37. Haughton, G. and Hunter, C. 1994. Sustainable cities, London: Jessica Kingsley.
38. Jones, C., Leishman, C., MacDonald, C., Orr, A. and Watkins, D. 2010. " Economic viability ". In Dimensions of the sustainable city, Edited by: Jenks, M., Jones, C. and Jenks, M. 145 - 162. London: Springer.
39. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 1994. Inquiry into planning for housing, York: JRF.
40. Katz, P. 1994. The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community, New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Leishman, C. 2009. Spatial change and the structure or urban housing sub-markets. Housing Studies, 24: 563 - 585.
42. Llewelyn-Davies. 1994. Providing More Homes in Urban Areas in association with the Joseph Rowntree foundation and environmental trust associates, Bristol: SAUS, University of Bristol.
43. Matthews, J. and Turnbull, G. 2007. Neighbourhood street layout and property value: The interaction of accessibility and land use mix. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35: 111 - 141.
44. Mills, E. 1972. Studies in the structure of the urban economy, Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins Press.
45. Muth, R. 1969. Cities and housing, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Nelessen, A. 1994. Visions for a new American dream: Process, principle and an ordinance to plan and design small communities, Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
47. Nelson, J. 2008. " Hedonic property value studies of transportation noise: Aircraft and road traffic ". In Hedonic methods in housing markets: Pricing environmental amenities and segregation, Edited by: Baranzini, A., Ramirez, J., Schaerer, C. and Thalmann, P. 57 - 82. New York, NY: Springer.
48. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2003. Sustainable communities: Building for the future, London: HMSO.
49. Parkes, A., Kearns, A. and Atkinson, R. 2002. What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods?. Urban Studies, 39: 2413 - 2438.
50. Platt, S., Fawcett, W. and de Carteret, R. 2004. Housing futures: Informed public opinion, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
51. Rogers, W. H. 1993. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13: 19 - 23. College Station, TX: Stata Press
52. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 34 - 55.
53. Shore, W. 1995. 'Recentralization': The single answer to more than a dozen United States problems and a major answer to poverty. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61: 496 - 503.
54. Simmel, G. 1995. " The metropolis and mental life ". In Metropolis: Center and symbol of our times, Edited by: Kasnitz, P. 30 - 45. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
55. Song, Y. and Knapp, G.-J. 2003. New urbanism and housing values: A disaggregate assessment. Journal of Urban Economics, 54: 218 - 238.
56. Talen, E. 1999. Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies, 36: 1361 - 1379.
57. Thanos, S., Bristow, A. and Wardman, M. 2012. Theoretically consistent temporal ordering specification in spatial hedonic pricing models applied to the valuation of aircraft noise. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1: 103 - 126.
58. Transit Cooperative Research Program. 1998. The costs of sprawl revisited, report 39, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
59. Tu, C. and Eppli, M. J. 1999. Valuing new urbanism: The case of the Kentlands. Real Estate Economics, 27: 425 - 451.
60. White, M. and Allmendinger, P. 2003. Land-use planning and the housing market: A comparative review of the UK and USA. Urban Studies, 40: 953 - 972.
61. Wirth, L. 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44: 1 - 24.
62. Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.