Morphological characteristics of potentially malignant pulmonary nodules in high-risk male smokers detected in lung cancer screening trial in Cracow, Poland

Polish Journal of Pathology

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 114-120

  Kiszka, Kinga ^a   Rudnicka Sosin, Lucyna ^a   Tomaszewska, Romana ^b   Urbańczyk Zawadzka, Małgorzata ^a   Krupiński, Maciej ^a   Pikul, Patrycja ^a   Podsiadło, Kaja ^a   Pasowicz, Mieczysław ^a   Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn ^c   Oudkerk, Matthijs ^c   Miszalski Jamka, Tomasz ^a  

^a Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny Im Jana Pawła II   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Computer aided diagnosis; Lung cancer screening; Pulmonary nodule volumetry; Pulmonary nodules

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; LUNG DISEASE; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POLAND; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLAND; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84880265955     PISSN: 12339687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/PJP.2013.36011     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2221-2229.
2. Kiszka K, Haduch J, Pasowicz M. Application of computer aid-ed diagnosis (CAD) in clinical imaging. Presentation of the val-ue and current directions in CAD development in various im-aging techniques based on literature review. Przegl Lek 2009; 66: 437-447.
3. Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H, et al. Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomized lung cancer screening tri-al. Lung Cancer 2006; 54: 177-184.
4. van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, et al. Risk-based se-lection from the general population in screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomized lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Can-cer 2007; 120: 868-874.
5. Zhao Y, de Bock GH, Vliegenthart R, et al. Performance of com-puter-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: com-parison with double reading by nodule volume. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2076-2084.
6. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Gudelines for man-agement of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237: 395-400.
7. Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early lung can-cer action project: initial findings on repeteat screenings. Can-cer 2001; 92: 153-159.
8. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. National Lung Can-cer Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395-409.
9. Wilson DO, Weissfeld JL, Fuhrman CR, et al. The Pittsburg Lung Cancer Screening (PLuSS): outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 956-961.
10. Sobue T, Moriyama N, Kaneko M, et al. Screening for lung can-cer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung can-cer association project. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 911-920.
11. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003; 226: 756-761.
12. Lopes Pegna A, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M, et al. ITALUNG Study Research Group. Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer 2009; 64: 34-40.
13. Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C, et al. Early lung cancer de-tection with spiral CT and position emission tomography in heavy smokers:2-year results. Lancet 2003; 362: 593-597.
14. Bastarrika G, García-Velloso MJ, Lozano MD, et al. Early lung cancer detection using spiral computed tomography and posi-tion emission tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 1378-1383.
15. Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 691-702.
16. Novello S, Fava C, Borasio P, et al. Three-year findings of an early lung cancer detection feasibility study with low-dose spi-ral computed tomography in heavy smokers. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 1661-1666.
17. Callol L, Roig F, Cuevas A, et al. Low-dose CT:a useful and ac-cessible tool for the early diagnosis of lung cancer in selected pop-ulations. Lung Cancer 2007; 56: 217-221.
18. MacRedmond R, McVey G, Lee M, et al. Screening for lung can-cer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up. Tho-rax 2006; 61: 54-56.
19. Garg K, Keith RL, Byers T, et al. Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: feasibility study and preliminary results. Radiology 2002; 225: 506-510.
20. Picozzi G, Paci E, Lopez Pegna A, et al. Screening of lung can-cer with low dose spiral CT: results of a three year pilot study and design of the randomized controlled trial "Italung-CT". Ra-diol Med 2005; 109: 17-26.
21. Horeweg N, van der Aalst CM, Thunnissen E, et al. Charac-teristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screen-ing in the randomized NELSON trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 848-854.
22. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harm of CT screening for lung cancer. JAMA 2012; 307: 2418-2429.