Mathematics and turbulence: Where do we stand?

Journal of Turbulence

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 42-76

  Bardos, Claude W ^a   Titi, Edriss S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Euler equations; Navier Stokes equations; turbulence; viscosity limit

Indexed keywords

FINITE TIME; IT FOCUS; MATHEMATICAL APPROACH; MATHEMATICAL STATEMENT; MATHEMATICAL TOOLS; VANISHING VISCOSITY; WEAK SOLUTION;

EULER EQUATIONS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; VISCOSITY;

TURBULENCE;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; TURBULENCE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84880260733     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14685248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14685248.2013.771838     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Frisch, U. 1995. Turbulence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Constantin, P., Foias, C., and, Temam, R. 1985. Attractor, Representing Turbulent Flows, 314 Memoir A.M.S., 53.
3. Foias, C., Manley, O., Rosa, R., and, Temam, R. 2001. Navier-Stokes Equations and Turbulence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Foias, C. 1997. " What do the Navier-Stokes equations tell us about turbulence? ". In Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 208, Harmonic analysis and Nonlinear Differential Equations, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, M. L. Lapidus, L. H. Harper and A. J. Rumbos, eds. 151-180.
5. Balci, N., Foias, C., Jolly, M. S., and, Rosa, R. R. 2010. On universal relations in 2-D turbulence. Discrete & Contin. Dynamical Systems, A 27: 1327-1351.
6. Dascaliuc, R., Foias, C., and, Jolly, M. 2008. Some specific mathematical constraints on 2 d turbulence. Physica D, 237: 3020-3029.
7. Foias, C., Jolly, M. S., Manley, O. P., and, Rosa, R. 2002. Statistical estimates for the Navier-Stokes equations and the Kraichnan theory of 2-D fully developed turbulence. J. Statist. Phys., 108: 591-645. (Pubitemid 37133796)
8. Bardos, C., and, Titi, E. S. 2007. Euler equations of incompressible ideal fluids. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 62: 409-451. (3) (375) (2007), pp. 5-46.
9. Also in Russian Math. Surveys 62(3) (2007), pp. 409-451.
10. Constantin, P. 2006. " Euler equations, Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence ". In Mathematical Foundation of Turbulent Viscous Flows, Edited by: Mathematics, in Springer Lecture Notes in, 1871, Vol, School, Lectures given at the C.I.M.E. Summer, Franca, Martina, Cannone, Italy, M. and Miyakawa, T. 1-43. Berlin: Springer. (Pubitemid 44418415)
11. Constantin, P. 2007. On the Euler equations of incompressible fluids. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 44: 603-621.
12. Gibbon, J. D. 2008. The 3D Euler equations: Where do we stand?. Physica, D 237: 1894-1904.
13. Bustamente, M. D., and, Kerr, R. M. 2008. 3D Euler in a 2D symmetry plane. Physica, D 237: 1912-1920.
14. Hou, T. Y. 2008. Blow-up or no blow-up? The interplay between theory & numerics. Physica, D 237: 1937-1944.
15. Leray, J. 1934. Sur le mouvement dun liquide visqueux emplissant lespace. (French) Acta Math., 63 (1): 193-248.
16. Landau, L. D., and, Lifshitz, E. M. 1959. Fluid Mechanics, New York: Pergamon Press.
17. Lions, P. L. 1996. Mathematical Topics in Fluid Mechanics, Oxford: Incompressible Models,Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications. Vol. 1
18. Constantin, P., and, Foias, C. 1988. Navier-Stokes Equations, Chicago, IL: Chicago Lectures in Mathematics University of Chicago Press.
19. Ferrari, A. 1993. On the blow-up of solutions of the 3-D Euler equations in a bounded domain. Commun. Math. Phys., 155: 277-294.
20. Lichtenstein, L. 1930. Über einige Existenzproblem der Hydrodynamik homogener unzusammendrückbarer, reibunglosser Flüssikeiten und die Helmholtzschen Wirbelsalitze. Mat. Zeit. Phys. 23 (1925), pp. 89-154; 26 (1927), pp. 193-323;, 32: 608
21. Majda, A. J., and, Bertozzi, A. L. 2002. Vorticity and Incompressible Flow, Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics Cambridge University Press. Vol. 27
22. Marchioro, C., and, Pulvirenti, M. 1994. Mathematical Theory of Incompressible Nonviscous Fluids, New York: Applied Mathematical Sciences Springer-Verlag. Vol. 96
23. Bardos, C., and, Titi, E. S. 2010. Loss of smoothness and energy conserving rough weak solutions for the 3 d Euler equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser., S 3 (2): 185-197.
24. n. Annal. Sc. Normale Sup. di Pisa, Volume dédié à Jean Leray,: 507-547.
25. Kukavica, I., and, Vicol, V. 2011. On the analyticity and Gevrey-class regularity up to the boundary for the Euler equations. Nonlinearity, 24: 765-796. 3
26. Beale, J. T., Kato, T., and, Majda, A. 1984. Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3D Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys., 94: 61-66.
27. Constantin, P., Fefferman, C., and, Madja, A. 1996. Geometric constraints on potential singular solutions for the 3-D Euler equation. Commun. Partial Diff. Equations 21,: 559-571. (Pubitemid 126329264)
28. Ponce, G. 1985. Remarks on a paper by J.T. Beale, T. Kato, and A. Majda. Commun. Math. Phys., 98: 349-353.
29. Deng, J., Hou, T.Y., and, Yu, X. 2005. Geometric properties and nonblowup of 3D incompressible Euler Flow. Commun. Partial Diff. Equations 30,: 225-243. (Pubitemid 40549853)
30. Yudovich, V. I. 1963. Non stationary flow of an ideal incompressible liquid. Zh. Vych. Mat., 3: 1032-1066.
31. Delort, J.-M. 1991. Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 4: 553-586.
32. Filho, M.C. Lopes, Lopes, H.J. Nussenzveig, and, Xin, Z. 2001. Existence of vortex sheets with reflection symmetry in two space dimensions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 158: 235-257. 3
33. Majda, A. 1993. Remarks on weak solutions for vortex sheets with a distinguished sign. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 42: 921-939.
34. Bardos, C., Linshiz, J., and, Titi, E. S. 2010. Global regularity and convergence of a Birkhoff-Rott-α approximation of the dynamics of vortex sheets of. the 2D Euler equations Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 63(6) 697-746.
35. De Lellis, C., and, Székelyhidi, L. Jr. 2010. On admissibility criteria for weak solutions of the Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 195(1) 225-260.
36. Scheffer, V. 1993. An inviscid flow with compact support in space-time. J. Geom. Anal., 3: 343-401.
37. Shnirelman, A. 1997. On the nonuniqueness of weak solutions of the Euler equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 50: 1261-1286.
38. De Lellis, C., and, Székelyhidi, L. Jr. 2012. The h-principle and the equations of fluid dynamics. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 49(3) 347-375.
39. Wiedemann, E. 2011. Existence of weak solutions for the incompressible Euler equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linaire, 28(5) 727-730.
40. Székelyhidi, L. 2011. Weak solutions to the incompressible Euler equations with vortex sheet initial data. C.R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 349(19-20) 1063-1066.
41. Bardos, C., Titi, E. S., and, Wiedemann, E. 2012. Vanishing viscosity as a selection principle for the Euler equations: The case of 3D shear flow. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 350(15-16) 757-760.
42. De Lellis, C., and, Székelyhidi, L. Jr. Dissipative Euler Flows and Onsagers Conjecture. arXiv:1205.3626v1,. [math.AP] 16 May 2012.
43. DiPerna, R., and, Majda, A. 1987. Oscillations and concentrations in weak solutions of the incompressible fluid equations. Commun. Math. Phys., 108(4) 667-689.
44. Onsager, L. 1949. Statistical hydrodynamics. Nuovo Cimento, 6(2) 279-287.
45. Constantin, P., E, W., and, Titi, E. S. 1994. Onsagers conjecture on the energy conservation for solutions of Eulers equation. Commun. Math. Phys., 165: 207-209.
46. De Lellis, C., and, Székelyhidi, L. Jr. 8 April 2012. Dissipative Continuous Euler flows. arXiv:1202.1751v1 [math.AP]
47. Choffrut, A., De Lellis, C., and, Székelyhidi, L. Jr. Dissipative Continuous Euler Flows in Two and Three Dimensions. arXiv:1205.1226v1 [math.AP]
48. Choffrut, A. 26 September 2012. h-Principles for the Incompressible Euler equations. arXiv:1209.5964v1 [math.AP]
49. Isett, P. Hölder Continuous Euler Flows in Three Dimensions with Compact Support in Time. arXiv:1211.4065v1 [math.AP]
50. Navier, C. 1822. Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Mém. Acad. Sci. Inst. France, 6: 389-440.
51. Stokes, G. 1845. On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion. Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 8: 257
52. Chorin, A., and, Marsden, J. 1997. A Mathematical Introduction for Fluid Mechanics, New York: 3rd ed. Springer.
53. Aoki, K., Inamuro, T., and, Onishi, Y. 1979. Slightly rarefied gas flow over a body with small accommodation coefficient. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 47: 663-671.
54. Bardos, C., Golse, F., and, Paillard, L. 2012. The incompressible limit of the Boltzmann equation with accommodation boundary condition. Commun. Math. Sci., 10(1) 159-190.
55. Masmoudi, N., and, Saint-Raymond, L. 2003. From the Boltzmann equation to the Stokes-Fourier system in a bounded domain. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 56: 1263-1293.
56. Prodi, G. 1959. Un teorema di unicità per le equazioni di Navier-Stokes. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 48: 173-182.
57. Serrin, J. 1962. On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 9: 187-191.
58. Germain, P. 2006. Multipliers, paramultipliers, and weak-strong uniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Diff. Equations, 226: 373-428. (Pubitemid 43705771)
59. Ladyzhenskaya, O. A. 2003. The sixth millennium problem: Navier-Stokes equations, existence and smoothness. (Russian) Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. 58(2) (2003), pp. 45-78.
60. translation in Russian Math. Surveys, 58(2) 251-286.
61. Temam, R. 2000. Some developments on Navier-Stokes equations in the second half of the 20th century. Development of Mathematics 1950-2000, Birkhauser, Basel,: 1049-1106.
62. Cao, C., and, Titi, E. S. 2008. Regularity criteria for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 57: 2643-2662.
63. Cao, C., and, Titi, E. S. 2011. Global regularity criterion for the 3 d Navier-Stokes equations involving one entry of the velocity gradient tensor. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 202: 919-932.
64. Ladyzhenskaya, O. A. 1968. On unique solvability of three-dimensional Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations under the axial symmetry. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI, 7: 155-177. (In Russian)
65. Mahalov, A., Titi, E. S., and, Leibovich, S. 1990. Invariant helical subspaces for the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 112: 193-222.
66. Ettinger, B., and, Titi, E. S. 2009. Global existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of 3-D Euler equations with helical symmetry in the absence of vorticity stretching. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41(1) 269-296.
67. Caffarelli, L., Kohn, R., and, Nirenberg, L. 1982. Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 35: 771-831.
68. Seregin, G., and, Sverák, V. 2002. Navier-Stokes equations with lower bounds on the pressure. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 163: 65-86. (Pubitemid 36195110)
69. Serrin, J. 1963. The initial value problem for the Navier-Stokes equations. Nonlinear Problems (Proc. Symp., Madison, WI), University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI,: 69-98.
70. Masmoudi, N. 2007. Remarks about the inviscid limit of the Navier-Stokes system. Commun. Math. Phys., 270: 777-788.
71. Linshiz, J., and, Titi, E. S. 2010. On the convergence rate of the Euler-α, inviscid second-grade fluid, model to the Euler equations. J. Stat. Phys., 1389(1) 305-332.
72. Wolibner, W. 1933. Un théorème sur lexistence du mouvement plan dun fluide parfait homogène incompressible, pendant un temps infiniment long. Math. Z., 37(1) 698-726.
73. Kato, T. 1984. Remarks on Zero Viscosity Limit for Nonstationary Navier-Stokes Flows With Boundary. Seminar on Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (Berkeley, Calif., 1983), Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., Vol. 2, Springer, New York,: 85-98.
74. Wang, X. 2001. A Kato type theorem on zero viscosity limit of Navier-Stokes flows. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 50: 223-241. (Pubitemid 33576039)
75. da Veiga, H. Beirão, and, Crispo, F. 2012. The 3-D inviscid limit result under slip boundary conditions. A negative answer. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 14: 55-59. 1
76. da Veiga, H. Beirão, and, Crispo, F. 2012. A missed persistence property for the Euler equations and its effect on inviscid limits. Nonlinearity, 25: 1661-1669.
77. Wang, L., Xin, Lizhen, Z., and, Zang, A. 2012. Vanishing viscous limits for 3D Navier-Stokes equations with a Navier-slip boundary condition. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 14(4) 791-825.
78. Prandtl, L. 1904. Uber flussigkeits-bewegung bei sehr kleiner reibung. In Actes du 3me Congrès international des Mathematiciens, Heidelberg, Teubner, Leipzig,: 484-491.
79. Wang, X. 2010. Examples of boundary layers associated with the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, 31 (5): 781-792.
80. Grenier, E. 2000. On the nonlinear instability of Euler and Prandtlequations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 53 (9): 1067-1109.
81. Oleinik, O. 1966. On the mathematical theory of boundary layer for an unsteady flow of incompressible fluid. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 30 (5): 952-974.
82. E, W., and, Engquist, B. 1997. Blowup of solutions of the unsteady Prandtls equation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 50 (12): 1287-1293. (Pubitemid 127384723)
83. Gérard-Varet, D., and, Dormy, E. 2010. On the ill-posedness of the Prandtl equation. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 23: 591-609.
84. Gérard-Varet, D., and, Nguyen, T. 2012. Remarks on the ill-posedeness of the Prandtl equation. Asymptot. Anal., 77 (1-2): 71-88.
85. Asano, A. 1991. Zero-viscosity Limit of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations, Kyoto: Conference at the IVth Workshop on Mathematical Aspects of Fluid and Plasma dynamics.
86. Sammartino, M., and, Caflisch, R. 1998. Zero viscosity limit for analytic solutions, of the Navier-Stokes equation on a half-space. I-II. Commun. Math. Phys., 192 (2): 433-461. 463-473. (Pubitemid 128357143)
87. Lombardo, M., Cannone, M., and, Sammartino, M. 2003. M. Well-posedness of the boundary layer equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 35 (4): 987-1004.
88. Kukavica, I., and, Vicol, V. 2013. On the local existence of analytic solutions to the Prandtl boundary layer equations. Commun. Math. Sci., 11 (1): 269-292.