Comparison of two modeling approaches for groundwater-surface water interactions

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 16, 2013, Pages 2258-2270

  Guay, C ^a   Nastev, M ^b   Paniconi, C ^c   Sulis, M ^c  

^a HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^b GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c CENTRE EAU TERRE ENVIRONNEMENT   (Canada)

Author keywords

CATHY; FEFLOW; HELP; Hydrogeology; Model comparison; Surface water groundwater interactions

Indexed keywords

CATHY; FEFLOW; HELP; MODEL COMPARISON; SURFACE WATER-GROUNDWATER INTERACTION;

AQUIFERS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; SURFACE WATERS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; WATER LEVELS; WATER SUPPLY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

DISCHARGE; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROGEOLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INFILTRATION; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; WATER LEVEL;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84880256423     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9323     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen DM, Mackie DC, Wei M. 2004. Groundwater and climate change: a sensitivity analysis for the Grand Forks aquifer, southern British Columbia, Canada. Hydrogeology Journal 12: 270-290.
2. Anderson E. 1973. National Weather Service river forecast system-snow accumulation and ablation model. Technical report, Hydrologic Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
3. Benoît N, Pasquier P, Marcotte D, Nastev M. 2005. Conditional stochastic inverse modeling of the Châteauguay river aquifers. In ModelCare 2005. The Hague: Netherlands; 6.
4. Berger K, Melchior S, Miehlich G. 1996. Suitability of Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model of the US Environmental Protection Agency for the simulation of the water balance of landfill cover systems. Environmental Geology 280(4): 181-189.
5. Bixio AC, Orlandini S, Paniconi C, Putti M. 2000. Physically-based distributed model for coupled surface runoff and subsurface flow simulation at the catchment scale. In Computational Methods in Water Resources, vol. 2, Surface Water Systems and Hydrology. Balkema: Rotterdam; 1115-1122.
6. Brooks RH, Corey AT. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Paper No. 3, Colorado State University, Civil Engineering Dep., Fort Collins, CO.
7. Campbell GS. 1974. A simple method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Science 1170(6): 311-314.
8. Camporese M, Paniconi C, Putti M, Orlandini S. 2010. Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data. Water Resources Research 460(W02512). DOI: 10.1029/2008WR007536.
9. Croteau A, Nastev M, Lefebvre R. 2010. Groundwater recharge assessment in the Chateauguay River watershed. Can. Water Res. J. 350(4): 451-468.
10. Diersch H-JG. 1998. FEFLOW Reference Manual. WASY Institute of Water Resources Planning and System Research Ltd.: Berlin, Germany.
11. Ebel BA, Loague K, Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE. 2008. Physics-based continuous simulation of long-term near-surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment. Water Resources Research 440(W07417). DOI: 10.1029/2077W006442.
12. Fleckenstein JH, Krause S, Hannah DM, Boano F. 2010. Groundwater-surface water interactions: New methods and models to improve understanding of processes and dynamics. Adv. Water Res. 33: 1291-1295.
13. Furman A. 2008. Modeling coupled surface-subsurface flow processes: a review. Vadose Zone J. 70(2): 741-756.
14. Gauthier M-J, Camporese M, Rivard C, Paniconi C, Larocque M. 2009. A modeling study of heterogeneity and surface water-groundwater interactions in the Thomas Brook catchment, Annapolis Valley (Nova Scotia, Canada). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13: 1583-1596.
15. van Genuchten MTh. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44: 892-898.
16. Horton RE. 1919. Rainfall interception. Mon. Wea. Rev. 470(9): 603-623.
17. Huyakorn PS, Thomas SD, Thompson BM. 1984. Techniques for making finite elements competitive in modeling flow in variably saturated porous media. Water Resources Research 200(8): 1099-1115.
18. Jones JP, Sudicky EA, Mclaren RG. 2008. Application of a fully integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: a case study. Water Resources Research 440(W03407). DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005603.
19. Jyrkama MI, Sykes JF, Normani SD. 2002. Recharge estimation for transient ground water modeling. Ground Water 400(6): 638-648.
20. Knisel WG, Moffit DC, Dumper TA. 1985. Representing seasonally frozen soil with the CREAMS model. Am. Soc. Agr. Eng. 28: 1487-1492.
21. Kollet SJ, Maxwell RM. 2006. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Adv. Water Res. 290(7): 945-958.
22. Lavigne M-A, Nastev M, Lefebvre R. 2010. Numerical simulation of groundwater flow in the Chateauguay River aquifers: Hydraulic properties and model calibration. Can. Water Res. J. 350(4): 469-486.
23. Mualem Y. 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 120(3): 513-522. DOI: 10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
24. Nastev M, Rivera A, Lefebvre R, Martel R, Savard M. 2005. Numerial simulation of groundwater flow in regional rock aquifers, Southwestern Quebec, Canada. Hydrogeology Journal 13: 835-384.
25. Orlandini S. 2002. On the spatial variation of resistance to flow in upland channel networks. Water Resources Research 380(10). DOI: 10.1029/2001WR001187.
26. Orlandini S, Rosso R. 1996. Diffusion wave modeling of distributed catchment dynamics. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10(3): 103-113.
27. Orlandini S, Rosso R. 1998. Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamics. Water Resources Research 340(8): 1971-1985.
28. Panday S, Huyakorn PS. 2004. A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow. Adv. Water Res. 27: 361-382.
29. Paniconi C, Putti M. 1994. A comparison of Picard and Newton iteration in the numerical solution of multidimensional variably saturated flow problems. Water Resources Research 300(12): 3357-3374.
30. Paniconi C, Wood EF. 1993. A detailed model for simulation of catchment scale subsurface hydrologic processes. Water Resources Research 290(6): 1601-1620.
31. Penman HL. 1963. Vegetation and hydrology, Technical Comment No. 53. Technical report, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, England.
32. Qu Y, Duffy CJ. 2007. A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resources Research 430(W08419). DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005752.
33. Ritchie JT. 1972. A model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research 80(5): 1204-1213.
34. Sarwar A, Eggers H. 2006. Development of a conjunctive use model to evaluate alternative management options for surface and groundwater resources. Hydrogeology Journal 140(8): 1676-1687.
35. Schroeder PR, Dozier TS, Zappi PA, McEnroe BM, Sjostrom J. September 1994. The Hydrological Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering Documentation for Version 3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC.
36. Scibek J, Allen DM, Cannon AJ, Whitfield PH. 2007. Groundwater-surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology 333: 165-181.
37. Sophocleous M. 2002. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 10: 52-67.
38. Sulis M, Meyerhoff SB, Paniconi C, Maxwell RM, Putti M, Kollet SJ. 2010. A comparison of two physics-based numerical models for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions. Adv. Water Res. 33: 456-467. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.01.010.
39. Therrien R, McLaren RG, Sudicky EA, Panday SM. 2006. HydroGeoSphere, A three-dimensional numerical model describing fully integrated subsurface and overland flow and solute transport, User Guide. Université Laval and University of Waterloo, Canada, 218 p.
40. Turcotte R, Fortin L-G, Fortin V, Fortin J-P, Villeneuve J-P. 2004. Operational analysis of the spatial distribution and the temporal evolution of the snowpack water equivalent in southern Quebec, Canada. Nordic Hydrology 380(3): 211-234. DOI: 10.2166/nh.2007.009.
41. USDA-SCS. 1985. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
42. VanderKwaak JE, Loague K. 2001. Hydrologic-response simulation for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resources Research 370(4): 999-1013.
43. VanderKwaak JE, Sudicky EA. September 1999. Application of a physically-based numerical model of surface and subsurface water flow and solute transport. In Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling, Proceedings of the ModelCARE 99 Conference, IAHS Publication No. 265, Switzerland.
44. Weill S, Mazzia A, Putti M, Paniconi C. 2011. Coupling water flow and solute transport into a physically-based surface-subsurface hydrological model. Adv. Water Res. 340(1): 128-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.10.001.
45. Winter TC. 1999. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal 70(1): 28-45.
46. Woessner WW. 2000. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water 380(3): 423-429.
47. Yalcin F, Demirer GN. 2002. Performance evaluation of landfills with the HELP (hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance) model: Izmit case study. Environmental Geology 42: 793-799.