Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1451-1467

  Dong, You ^a   Frangopol, Dan M ^a   Saydam, Duygu ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridges; Deterioration; Loss; Multi hazard; Seismic fragility; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONCRETES; DETERIORATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLOODS; GLOBAL WARMING; HAZARDS; LOSSES; SEISMOLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; MULTI-HAZARD; NON-LINEAR FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES; STRUCTURAL DETERIORATION; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BRIDGE; CORROSION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84880254098     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2281     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ang AHS, De Leon D. Determination of optimal target reliabilities for design and upgrading of structures. Structural Safety 1997; 19(1):91-103.
2. Frangopol DM. Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2011; 7(6):389-413.
3. Adams WM. The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting 29-31, 2006.
4. Padgett JE, Dennemann K, Ghosh J. Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety 2010; 32(3):165-173.
5. Spencer PC, Hendy CR, Petty R. Quantification of sustainability principles in bridge projects. Proceedings of the ICE-Bridge Engineering 2012; 165(2):81-89.
6. Stein SM, Young GK, Trent RE, Pearson DR. Prioritizing scour vulnerable bridges using risk. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 1999; 5(3):95-101.
7. Ang AHS, De Leon D. Modeling and analysis of uncertainties for risk-informed decisions in infrastructures engineering. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2005; 1(1):19-31.
8. Banerjee S, Prasad G. Seismic risk of a reinforced concrete bridge in the presence of flood-induced scour. Structures Congress, Chicago, 2012.
9. Decò A, Frangopol DM. Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards. Journal of Risk Research 2011; 14(9):1057-1089.
10. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2000; 126(12):1224-1231.
11. Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:187-199.
12. Ghosh J, Padgett PE. Aging consideration in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curve. Journal of Structural Engineering 2010; 136(12):1497-1511.
13. Akiyama M, Frangopol DM, Matsuzaki H. Life-cycle reliability of RC bridge piers under seismic and airborne chloride hazards. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011; 40 (15):1671-1687.
14. Vu KAT, Stewart MG. Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models. Structural Safety 2000; 22(4):313-333.
15. Simon J, Bracci J, Gardoni P. Seismic response and fragility of deteriorated reinforced concrete bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 2010; 136(10):1273-1281.
16. Thoft-Christensen P, Jensen FM, Middleton CR, Blackmore A. Revised Rules for Concrete Bridges. Thomas Telford: London, UK, 1997; 175-188.
17. Val DV, Stewart MG. Life-cycle cost analysis of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments. Structural Safety 2003; 25(4):343-362.
18. Liu Y, Weyers RE. Modeling the time-to-corrosion cracking in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures. ACI Materials Journal, 1998; 95(6):675-681.
19. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998; 14(3):469-500.
20. Kim SH, Shinozuka M. Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2004; 19(1-2):105-112.
21. Aviram A, Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Guidelines for nonlinear analysis of bridge structures in California. Technical Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2008.
22. Padgett JE, Ghosh J, Dennemann K. Sustainable infrastructure subjected to multiple threats. TCLEE 2009: Lifeline Earthquake Engineering in a Multi-hazard Environment, ASCE, 703-713.
23. Choe D, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T. Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2008; 93(3):383-393.
24. Banerjee S, Shinozuka M. Mechanistic quantification of RC bridge damage states under earthquake through fragility analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2008; 23 (1):12-22.
25. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):526-533.
26. Harvat JA. Effect of corrosion on the seismic response of a single-bent, reinforced concrete bridge. Master Thesis, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA, 2009.
27. Hwang H, Liu JB, Chiu YH. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Technical Report, RR-4 Project, Mid-America Earthquake Center, 2001.
28. Richardson EV, Davis SM. Evaluating Scour at Bridges. Hydraulic Engineering Circular (HEC) No. 18, Department of Transportation: Washington, 2001.
29. Tapia C, Ghosh J, Padgett JE. Life cycle performance metrics for aging and seismically vulnerable bridges. Proceedings of the 2011 Structures Congress, Las Vegas, Nevada, ASCE.
30. Mander JB. Fragility curve development for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway bridges. Technical Report, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 1999.
31. Rackwitz R. Optimization and risk acceptability based on the life quality index. Structural Safety 2002; 24(2-4):297-331.
32. Mackie K, Stojadinovic B. Probabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering 2001; 6(6):468-481.
33. Caltrans. Seismic Design Criteria. California DOT: Sacramento, California, 2006.
34. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain behavior of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering 1988; 114(8):1804-1826
35. McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of output variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979; 21(2):239-45.
36. Vu KAT. Corrosion-induced cracking and spatial time-dependent reliability analysis of reinforced concrete structures. PhD thesis, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, 2003.
37. Dennemann KL. Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis for bridge seismic retrofits. Master Thesis, Houston, Texas, USA, 2009.
38. Gallivan F, Ang-Olson J, Papson A. Greenhouse gas mitigation measures for transportation construction, maintenance, and operations activities. AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment: San Francisco, CA, 2010.