Testing versus proving in climate impact research

Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs

Volumn 19, Issue , 2013, Pages 41-54

  Ionescu, Cezar ^a   Jansson, Patrik ^b  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Climate impact research; Dependently typed programming; Domain specific languages; Formalization

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCHES; COUNTERFACTUALS; DEPENDENT TYPES; DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; FORMALIZATION; INCREASING FUNCTIONS; SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM ORIENTED LANGUAGES;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84880237438     PISSN: 18688969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2011.41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. P. Ammann and J. Offutt. Introduction to Software Testing. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
2. Jean-Philippe Bernardy, Patrik Jansson, and Koen Claessen. Testing polymorphic properties. In Andrew Gordon, editor, European Symposium on Programming, volume 6012 of LNCS, pages 125-144. Springer, 2010.
3. E. Bishop and D. Bridges. Constructive Analysis. Springer, New York, 1985.
4. S. Boldo and G. Melquiond. Flocq: A unified library for proving floating-point algorithms in Coq. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Symposium on Computer Arithmetic, pages 243-252, Tübingen, Germany, July 2011. IEEE CS Press.
5. Edwin C. Brady. Idris - systems programming meets full dependent types. In Proc. 5th ACM workshop on Programming languages meets program verification, PLPV '11, pages 43-54. ACM, 2011.
6. T. Cannon, J. Twigg, and J. Rowell. Social vulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and disasters. Technical report, AON Benfield UCL Hazard Research Center, 2002. Available at http://www.abuhrc.org/Documents/Social-vulnerability- sust-live.pdf.
7. J. Chakraborty, G.A. Tobin, and B.E. Montz. Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Review, pages 22-33, February 2005.
8. K. Claessen and J. Hughes. Specification based testing with QuickCheck. In The Fun of Programming, Cornerstones of Computing, pages 17-40. Palgrave, 2003.
9. T. Feldbrügge and J. von Braun. Is the world becoming a more risky place? Trends in disasters and vulnerability to them. Technical Report 46, Center for Development Research, Bonn, 2002.
10. John Harrison. Floating point verification in HOL Light: The exponential function. Technical Report 428, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, 1997. Available as http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jrh13/papers/tang.html.
11. C. Ionescu. Vulnerability Modeling and Monadic Dynamical Systems. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Free University Berlin, February 2009.
12. R. Krebbers and B. Spitters. Computer certified efficient exact reals in Coq. In James H. Davenport et al., editors, Calculemus/MKM, volume 6824 of LNCS, pages 90-106. Springer, 2011.
13. D. Lemmen and F. Warren, editors. Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: A Canadian Perspective. Natural Resources Canada, 2004.
14. Daniel Lincke, Patrik Jansson, Marcin Zalewski, and Cezar Ionescu. Generic libraries in C++ with concepts from high-level domain descriptions in Haskell: A DSL for computational vulnerability assessment. In Walid Taha, editor, IFIP Working Conf. on Domain Specific Languages, volume 5658 of LNCS, pages 236-261, 2009.
15. F. Lindblad and M. Benke. A tool for automated theorem proving in Agda. In Jean- Christophe Filliâtre et al., editors, Types for Proofs and Programs, International Workshop, TYPES 2004, LNCS, pages 154-169. Springer, 2006.
16. J.J. McCarthy, O. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken, and K.S. White, editors. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
17. M.J. Metzger and D. Schröter. Towards a spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of environmental change in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 6(4):201- 216, 2006.
18. Paul S. Miner. Defining the IEEE-854 floating-point standard in PVS. Technical report, 1995. Technical Memorandum 110167, NASA, Langley Research. Availble as http://nasa1995.tpub.com/NASA-95-tm110167/.
19. Jamie Morgenstern and Daniel R. Licata. Security-typed programming within dependently typed programming. In Proc. 15th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, ICFP '10, pages 169-180. ACM, 2010.
20. G.J. Myers. The Art of Software Testing. Second edition, revised and updated by T. Badgett and T.M. Thomas with C. Sandler. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.
21. U. Norell. Towards a Practical Programming Language Based on Dependent Type Theory. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, September 2007.
22. R. O'Connor. A monadic, functional implementation of real numbers. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 1:129-159, 2007.
23. Russell O'Connor. Certified exact transcendental real number computation in Coq. In Otmane Ait Mohamed et al., editors, Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, volume 5170 of LNCS, pages 246-261. Springer, 2008.
24. N. Oury and W. Swierstra. The power of Pi. In International Conference on Functional Programming, pages 39-50. ACM, 2008.
25. B. Pascal. Minor Works, translated by O. W. Wright, volume XLVIII, Part 2 of The Harvard classics. P.F. Collier & Son, 1909-14.
26. The Agda Team. The Agda Wiki, 2011. Available from http://wiki.portal. chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php. Includes documentation, links to the Agda implementation and to the standard library.
27. K. Thywissen. Components of risk, a comparative glossary. SOURCE - Studies Of the University: Research, Counsel, Education, 2, 2006.
28. UN/ISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). Living with Risk. A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives. United Nations, Geneva, 2004.