The clinical utility of gene expression testing on the diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting to the cardiologist with symptoms of suspected obstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the IMPACT (Investigation of a molecular personalized coronary gene expression test on cardiology practice pattern) trial

Critical Pathways in Cardiology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 37-42

  McPherson, John A ^a   Davis, Kelly ^b   Yau, May ^b   Beineke, Phil ^b   Rosenberg, Steven ^b   Monane, Mark ^b   Fredi, Joseph L ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CardioDx Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical utility; Coronary disease; Diagnosis; Gene expression; Test

Indexed keywords

CASPASE 5;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; BODY MASS; CARDIOLOGIST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DYSLIPIDEMIA; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION SCORE; HEART PALPITATION; HEARTBURN; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALAISE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; THORAX PAIN; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84880230111     PISSN: 1535282X     EISSN: 15352811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182822bd0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. R oger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al.; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:188-197.
2. G ibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al.; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). Circulation. 2003;107:149-158.
3. Fong PP, Jackson EB, Churchwell KB, et al. Acute coronary syndrome pathways: alignment with a bundled care reimbursement model. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011;10:1-8.
4. A n exploratory report of chest pain in primary care. A report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1990; 3:143-150.
5. Katerndahl DA, Trammell C. Prevalence and recognition of panic states in STARNET patients presenting with chest pain. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:54-63.
6. Klinkman MS, Stevens D, Gorenflo DW. Episodes of care for chest pain: a preliminary report from MIRNET. Michigan Research Network. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:345-352.
7. C haitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, et al. Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation. 1981;64:360-367.
8. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350-1358.
9. C heng VY, Berman DS, Rozanski A, et al. Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM). Circulation. 2011;124:2423-2432, 1-8.
10. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1531-1540.
11. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:125-136.
12. Shaw LJ, Peterson ED, Shaw LK, et al. Use of a prognostic treadmill score in identifying diagnostic coronary disease subgroups. Circulation. 1998;98:1622-1630.
13. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:886-895.
14. E instein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290-1305.
15. E instein AJ, Weiner SD, Bernheim A, et al. Multiple testing, cumulative radiation dose, and clinical indications in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging. JAMA. 2010;304:2137-2144.
16. Rhee CM, Bhan I, Alexander EK, et al. Association between iodinated contrast media exposure and incident hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:153-159.
17. E lashoff MR, Wingrove JA, Beineke P, et al. Development of a blood-based gene expression algorithm for assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease in non-diabetic patients. BMC Med Genomics. 2011;4:26.
18. Rosenberg S, Elashoff MR, Beineke P, et al.; PREDICT (Personalized Risk Evaluation and Diagnosis in the Coronary Tree) Investigators. Multicenter validation of the diagnostic accuracy of a blood-based gene expression test for assessing obstructive coronary artery disease in nondiabetic patients. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:425-434.
19. T homas GS, Voros S, McPherson JA, et al. The COMPASS trial (NCT01117506): a prospective multi-center, double-blind study assessing a whole blood gene expression test for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 2011;124:A11106.
20. RDC Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2007.
21. Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1971:97-104.
22. Steinhart B, Thorpe KE, Bayoumi AM, et al. Improving the diagnosis of acute heart failure using a validated prediction model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1515-1521.
23. L o SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1671-1676.
24. N ystrom SJ, Hornberger JC, Varadhachary GR, et al. Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling for tumor-site origin in patients with metastatic or poorly differentiated cancer: impact on diagnosis, treatment, and survival. Oncotarget. 2012;3:620-628.
25. Chaitman BR, Fisher LD, Bourassa MG, et al. Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS). Am J Cardiol. 1981;48:765-777.
26. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, et al.; Writing Group on Perfusion Imaging in Women. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease-the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction]. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003;10:95-101.
27. Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, et al.; WOMEN Trial Investigators. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial. Circulation. 2011;124:1239-1249.
28. Bösner S, Becker A, Haasenritter J, et al. Chest pain in primary care: epidemiology and pre-work-up probabilities. Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15: 141-146.
29. Diercks DB, Kirk JD, Turnipseed SD, et al. Assessing the need for functional diagnostic testing in low-risk women with chest pain. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2006;5:64-68.