Taken with a Grain of Salt: Experimentation and the Chemistry of Archaeological Ceramics from Xaltocan, Mexico

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 862-898

  Stoner, Wesley D ^a   Millhauser, John K ^b   Rodríguez Alegría, Enrique ^c   Overholtzer, Lisa ^d   Glascock, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramics; Chemical analysis; Exchange; Experimental archaeology; Mesoamerica; Technological choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880182362     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-013-9179-2     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Abbott, D. R. (2008). The process, location, and history of Hohokam Buff ware production: some experimental and analytical results. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(2), 388–397.
2. Aréchiga Córdoba, E. (2004). El desagüe del Valle de México, siglos XVI-XXI: Una historia paradójica. Arqueología Mexicana, 12(68), 60–65.
3. Arnold, D. E. (1971). Ethnomineralogy of Ticul, Yucatan potters: etics and emics. American Antiquity, 36(1), 20–40.
4. Arnold, D.E. (1985). Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Arnold, P. J., III. (1991). Domestic ceramic production and spatial organization: a Mexican case study in ethnoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Arnold, D. E., Neff, H., & Bishop, R. L. (1991). Compositional analysis and “sources” of pottery: an ethnoarchaeological approach. American Anthropologist, 93(1), 70–90.
7. Bearat, H., Dufournier, D., Nguyen, N., & Raveau, B. (1989). Influence de NaCl Sur la Couleur et la Composition Chimique des Pates Ceramiques Calcaires au Cours de Leur Cuisson. Revue d'Archéometrie, 13, 43–53.
8. Bishop, R. L. (1980). Aspects of ceramic compositional modeling. In R. E. Fry (Ed.), Models and methods in regional exchange (pp. 47–65). Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.
9. Bishop, R. L., Rands, R. L., & Holley, G. R. (1982). Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 5, pp. 275–330). New York: Academic.
10. Blackman, M. J., & Bishop, R. L. (2007). The Smithsonian–NIST partnership: the application of instrumental neutron activation analysis to archaeology. Archaeometry, 49(2), 321–341.
11. Blanton, R. E. (1996). The Basin of Mexico market system and the growth of empire. In M. E. Smith & F. F. Berdan (Eds.), Aztec imperial strategies. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.
12. Bonifay, M. (2004). Études sur la Céramique Romaine Tardive d'Afrique. Oxford: BAR-IS.
13. Boulanger, M.T., Fehrenbach, S., & Glascock, M.D. (2012). Experimental evaluation of sample-extraction methods and potential for contamination in ceramic specimens. Archaeometry. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00706.x
14. Bourdieu. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
15. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
16. Brumfiel, E. M. (1991). Tribute and commerce in imperial cities: the case of Xaltocan, Mexico. In H. J. M. Claessen, P. van de Velde (Eds.), Early state economics (pp. 177–198). New Brunswick: Transaction.
17. Brumfiel, E. M. (2005a). Conclusions. In E. M. Brumfiel (Ed.), Production and power at Postclassic Xaltocan (pp. 349–368). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
18. Brumfiel, E. M. (Ed.). (2005b). Production and power at Postclassic Xaltocan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
19. Brumfiel, E. M., & Hodge, M. D. (1996). Interaction in the Basin of Mexico: the case of Postclassic Xaltocan. In A. Guadalupe Mastache de Escobar (Ed.), Arqueología Mesoamericana: Homenaje a William T. Sanders (pp. 417–437). México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Arqueología Mexicana.
20. Burton, J. H., & Simon, A. W. (1993). Acid extraction as a simple and inexpensive method for compositional characterization of archaeological ceramics. American Antiquity, 58(1), 45–59.
21. Buxeda i Garrigos, J. (1999). Alteration and contamination of archaeological ceramics: the pertubation problem. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(3), 295–313.
22. Buxeda i Garrigos, J., Mommsen, H., & Tsolakidou, A. (2002). Alterations of Na, K and Rb concentrations in Mycenaean pottery and a proposed explanation using X-ray diffraction. Archaeometry, 44(2), 187–198.
23. Carpenter, A. J., & Feinman, G. M. (1999). The effects of behaviour on ceramic composition: implications for the definition of production locations. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(7), 783–796.
24. Carrasco, P. (1999). The Tenochca Empire of Ancient Mexico: the Triple Alliance of Tenochtitlán, Tetzcoco, and Tlacopan. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
25. Chimonas, S. (2005). Occupational history of Prehispanic Xaltocan. In E. M. Brumfiel (Ed.), Production and power at Postclassic Xaltocan (pp. 169–194). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
26. Cortés, H. (1970). Cartas de Relación. México: Porrúa.
27. Crider, D. L. (2011). Epiclassic and Early Postclassic Interaction in Central Mexico as evidenced by decorated pottery. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
28. Croissier, M. M. (2007). The Zapotec presence at Teotihuacan, Mexico: political ethnicity and domestic identity. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
29. Day, P. M., & Kilikoglou, V. (2001). Analysis of ceramics from the kiln. Hesperia Supplement, 30, 111–133.
30. Day, P. M., Kiriatzi, E., Tsolakidou, A., & Kilikoglou, V. (1999). Group therapy in Crete: a comparison between analyses by NAA and thin section petrography of Early Minoan pottery. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(8), 1025–1036.
31. De Lucia, K. (2011). Domestic economies and regional transition: household production and consumption in Early Postclassic Mexico. Evanston: Northwestern University.
32. Cuomo di Caprio, N. (1991). Ceramiche Invetriate Medievali di Agrigento e Delia: Analisi stereoscopica, mineralogico-petrografica e SEM/EDS. In S. Scuto (Ed.), L'eta di Federico II Nella Sicilia Centro Meridionale (pp. 171–183). Rome: Atti Delle Giomate di Studio.
33. Dussubieux, L., Golitko, M., Williams, P. R., & Speakman, R. J. (2007). Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysis applied to the characterization of Peruvian Wari ceramics. In M. D. Glascock, R. J. Speakman, & R. S. Popelka-Filcoff (Eds.), Archaeological chemistry: analytical techniques and archaeological interpretation (ACS Symposium Series No. 968) (pp. 349–363). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
34. Flores, T. (1918). El tequesquite del Lago de Texcoco. México: Departamento de Talleres Graficos de la Secretaria de Fomento.
35. Frederick, C. D., Winsborough, B., & Popper, V. S. (2005). Geoarchaeological Investigations in the Northern Basin of Mexico. In E. M. Brumfiel (Ed.), Production and Power at Postclassic Xaltocan (pp. 71–116). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
36. Galván Moreno, J. (1945). Cristalización fraccionada por evaporación solar de las aguas del lago de Texcoco. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
37. Garraty, C. P. (2006). Aztec Teotihuacan: political processes at a Postclassic and early Colonial city-state in the Basin of Mexico. Latin American Antiquity, 17(4), 363–387.
38. Garraty, C. P. (2007). Intercambio de mercado y consolidación en el corazón del Imperio Azteca. Revista Española de Antropología Americana, 37(2), 139–164.
39. Gibson, C. (1964). The Aztecs under Spanish rule. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
40. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Glascock, M. D. (1992). Characterization of archaeological ceramics at MURR by neutron activation analysis and multivariate statistics. In H. Neff (Ed.), Chemical characterization of ceramic pastes in archaeology (pp. 11–26). Madison: Prehistory.
42. Golitko, M., Dudgeon, J. V., Neff, H., & Terrell, J. E. (2012). Identification of post-depositional chemical alteration of ceramics from the north coast of New Guinea (Sandaun Province) by time of flight–laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (TOPF–LA–ICP–MS). Archaeometry, 54(1), 80–100.
43. Gosselain, O. P. (1992). Bonfire of the enquiries: pottery firing temperatures in archaeology—what for? Journal of Archaeological Science, 19(3), 243–259.
44. Gosselain, O. P. (2000). Materializing identities: an African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(3), 187–217.
45. Gratuze, B., Blet-Lemarquand, M., & Barrandon, J.-N. (2001). Mass spectrometry with laser sampling: a new tool to characterize archaeological materials. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 247(3), 645–656.
46. Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Basic methods of conserving underwater archaeological material culture. Manuscript on file at the Department of Anthropology, Nautical Archaeology Program, Texas A&M University, College Station.
47. Hassig, R. (2006). Mexico and the Spanish conquest (2nd ed.). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
48. Hicks, F. (1994). Xaltocan under Mexica Domination. In Caciques and their people: a volume in honor of Ronald Spores (Vol. 89, pp. 67–85). Ann Arbor: Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan
49. Hodge, M. G., & Neff, H. (2005). Xaltocan in the economy of the Basin of Mexico: a view from ceramic tradewares. In E. M. Brumfiel (Ed.), Production and power at Postclassic Xaltocan (pp. 320–348). Mexico, D.F.: INAH.
50. Hodge, M.G., Blackman, M.J., Minc, L.D., & Neff, H. (1992). Compositional perspective on ceramic production in the Aztec empire. Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, 203–220
51. Hodge, M. G., Blackman, M. J., Mine, L. D., & Neff, H. (1993). Black-on-orange ceramic production in the Aztec empire's heartland. Latin American Antiquity, 4(2), 130–157.
52. Kilikoglou, V., Maniatis, Y., & Grimanis, A. P. (1988). The effect of purification and firing of clays on trace element provenance studies. Archaeometry, 30(1), 37–46.
53. Kolb, C. C. (1988). Cultural ecology of Classic Teotihuacan Period Copoid ceramics. In Pot for all reasons: ceramic ecology revisited (pp. 147–197). Philadelphia: Laboratory of Anthropology, Temple University
54. Larson, D. O., Sakai, S., & Neff, H. (2005). LA–ICP–MS as a bulk chemical characterization technique: comparison of LA–ICP–MS, MD–ICP–MS, and INAA data on Virgin Branch Azasazi ceramics. In R. J. Speakman & H. Neff (Eds.), Laser ablation ICP–MS in archaeological research (pp. 94–103). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
55. Lemonnier, P. (1992). Elements for an anthropology of technology. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
56. Livingstone-Smith, A. (2000). Bonfire II: the return of pottery firing temperatures. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 991–1003.
57. Longacre, W. A., Xia, J., & Yang, T. (2000). I want to buy a black pot. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 273–293.
58. Mathes, W. M. (1970). To save a city: the Desaque of Mexico-Huehuetoca, 1607. The Americas, 26(4), 419–438.
59. Matson, F. P. (1971). A study of temperatures used in firing ancient Mesopotamian pottery. In R. H. Brill (Ed.), Science and archaeology (pp. 65–79). Cambridge: MIT.
60. Millhauser, J. K. (2012). Saltmaking, craft, and community at Late Postclassic and Early Colonial San Bartolome Salinas, Mexico. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
61. Millhauser, J. K., Rodríguez-Alegría, E., & Glascock, M. D. (2011). Testing the accuracy of portable X-ray fluorescence to study Aztec and Colonial obsidian supply at Xaltocan, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(11), 3141–3152. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.018.
62. Minc, L.D. (1994). Political economy and market economy under Aztec rule: a regional perspective based on decorated ceramic production and distribution systems in the valley of Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
63. Mitchem, J. M. (1982). Experiments in the manufacturing technology of Pasco series ceramics from peninsular Florida. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 39th annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Memphis, Tennessee.
64. Montoya Riviero, M.C. (1999). Del desagüe del Valle de México al drenaje profundo. México Desconocido, 30.
65. Morehart, C. T. (2010). The archaeology of farmscapes: production, place, and the materiality of landscape at Xaltocan, Mexico. Evanston: Northwestern University.
66. Morehart, C. T., & Eisenberg, D. T. A. (2010). Prosperity, power, and change: modeling maize at Postclassic Xaltocan, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29, 94–112.
67. Neff, H. (2000). Neutron activation analysis for provenance determination in archaeology. In E. C. a. G. Spoto (Ed.), Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology (pp. 81–134). New York: Wiley.
68. Neff, H. (2012). Comment: Chemical and mineralogical approaches to ceramic provenance determination. Archaeometry, 54(2), 244–249.
69. Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., & Sayre, E. V. (1988). Simulation approach to the problem of tempering in compositional studies of archaeological ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science, 15(2), 159–172.
70. Neff, H., Sayre, E. V., & Bishop, R. L. (1989). More observations on the problem of tempering in compositional studies of archaeological ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science, 16(1), 57–69.
71. Neff, H., Cogswell, J. W., & Ross, L. M. J. (2003). Supplementing bulk chemistry in archaeological ceramic provenance investigations. In L. van Zelst (Ed.), Patterns and process: a festschrift in honor of Dr. Edward V. Sayre (pp. 201–226). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Education.
72. Nichols, D. L., Brumfiel, E. M., Neff, H., Hodge, M., Charlton, T. H., & Glascock, M. D. (2002). Neutrons, markets, cities, and empires: a 1000-year perspective on ceramic production and distribution in the Postclassic Basin of Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21(1), 25–82.
73. Nichols, D. L., Elson, C., Cecil, L. G., Neivens de Estrada, N., Glascock, M. D., & Mikkelsen, P. (2009). Chiconautla, Mexico: a crossroads of Aztec trade and politics. Latin American Antiquity, 20(3), 443–472.
74. Overholtzer, L. (2012). Empires and everyday material practices: a household archaeology of Aztec and Spanish imperialism at Xaltocan, Mexico. Evanston: Northwestern University.
75. Overholtzer, L., & Stoner, W. D. (2011). Merging the social and the material: life histories of ancient mementos from central Mexico. Journal of Social Archaeology, 11(2).
76. Palerm, A. (1973). Obras hidráulicas prehispánicas en el sistema lacustre del valle de México. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología.
77. Parsons, J. R. (2001). The Last Saltmakers of Nexquipayac, Mexico: An Archaeological Ethnography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
78. Peters, J. M. (2002). A compositional analysis of plainwares from Xaltocan, Mexico. Lux Fiat, 1, 149–157.
79. Picon, M. (1991). quelques observations complementaires sur les alterations de composition des ceramiques au cours du temps: Cas de quelques alcalins et alcalino-terreux. Revue d'Archéometrie, 15, 117–122.
80. Pool, C. A. (1990). Ceramic production, resource procurement, and exchange at Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans.
81. Pool, C. A. (2000). Why a kiln? Firing technology in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz (Mexico). Archaeometry, 42(1), 61–76.
82. Reina, R. E., & Hill, R. M. (1974). The traditional pottery of Guatemala. Austin: University of Texas Press.
83. Rice, P. M. (2005). Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
84. Rodríguez-Alegría, E. (2008a). De la Edad de Piedra a la Edad de más Piedra. Cuadernos de Arqueología Mediterránea, XVII, 15–30.
85. Rodríguez-Alegría, E. (2008b). Narratives of conquest, colonialism, and cutting-edge technology. American Anthropologist, 110(1), 33–41.
86. Rodríguez-Alegría, E. (2010). Incumbents and challengers: indigenous politics and the adoption of Spanish material culture in colonial Xaltocan, Mexico. Historical Archaeology, 44(2), 51–71.
87. Rye, O. S. (1976). Keeping your temper under control. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, XI(2), 106–137.
88. Rye, O. S. (1981). Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum.
89. Rye, O. S., & Evans, C. (1976). Traditional pottery techniques of Pakistan: field and laboratory studies. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
90. Sanders, W. T., Parsons, J., & Santley, R. S. (1979). The Basin of Mexico: ecological processes in the evolution of civilization. New York: Academic.
91. Sayre, E. V., & Harbottle, G. (1979). The analysis by neutron activation of archaeological ceramics related to Teotihuacan: local wares and trade sherds. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Informal Report C-2250.
92. Sayre, E. V., Dodson, R. W., & Burr Thompson, D. (1957). Neutron activation study of Mediterranean potsherds. American Journal of Archaeology, 61(1), 35–41.
93. Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Current Anthropology, 28(5), 595–622.
94. Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity, 62, 27–50.
95. Schwedt, A., & Mommsen, H. (2004). Clay paste mixtures identified by neutron activation analysis in pottery of a Roman workshop in Bonn, Germany. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31(9), 1251–1258.
96. Schwedt, A., & Mommsen, H. (2007). On the influence of drying and firing of clay on the formation of trace element concentration profiles within pottery. Archaeometry, 49(3), 495–509.
97. Schwedt, A., Mommsen, H., & Zacharias, N. (2004). Post-depositional elemental alterations in pottery: neutron activation analyses of surface and core samples. Archaeometry, 46(1), 85–101.
98. Sillar, B. (2000). The challenge of [technological choices] for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry, 42, 2–20.
99. Sillar, B., & Tite, M. S. (2000). The challenge of 'technological choices' for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry, 42(1), 2–20.
100. Speakman, R. J., & Neff, H. (2005). The application of laser ablation ICP–MS to the study of archaeological materials—an introduction. In R. J. Speakman & H. Neff (Eds.), Laser ablation ICP–MS in archaeological research (pp. 1–15). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
101. Stark, M. T. (Ed.). (1998). The archaeology of social boundaries. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
102. Stark, M. T., Bishop, R. L., & Miksa, E. J. (2000). Ceramic technology and social boundaries: cultural practices in Kalinga clay selection and use. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7(4), 295–331.
103. Stoner, W. D., & Glascock, M. D. (2012). The forest or the trees? Behavioral and methodological considerations for geochemical characterization of heavily-tempered ceramic pastes using NAA and LA–ICP–MS. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(8), 2668–2683.
104. Stoner, W. D., Pool, C. A., Neff, H., & Glascock, M. D. (2008). Exchange of coarse orange pottery in the Middle Classic Tuxtla Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(5), 1412–1426.
105. Tsolakidou, A., Kilikoglou, V., Kiriatzi, E., & Day, P. M. (2002). Investigating petrological and chemical groupings of early Minoan cooking vessels. In V. Kilikoglou, A. Hein, & Y. Maniatis (Eds.), Modern trends in scientific studies on ancient ceramics. BAR International Series 1011 (pp. 19–33). Oxford: Archaeopress.