Dynamic enzyme docking to the ribosome coordinates N-terminal processing with polypeptide folding

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 843-850

  Sandikci, Arzu ^a,b,c,d   Gloge, Felix ^a,b   Martinez, Michael ^c   Mayer, Matthias P ^a,b   Wade, Rebecca ^a,c   Bukau, Bernd ^a,b   Kramer, Günter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^c HEIDELBERG INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL STUDIES   (Germany)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; METHIONYL AMINOPEPTIDASE; PEPTIDE DEFORMYLASE; POLYPEPTIDE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RIBOSOME;

AMIDOHYDROLASES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; RIBOSOMES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84880169955     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2615     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Hartl, F.U., Bracher, A. & Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475, 324-332 (2011).
2. Preissler, S. & Deuerling, E. Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 274-283 (2012).
3. Giglione, C., Fieulaine, S. & Meinnel, T. Cotranslational processing mechanisms: towards a dynamic 3D model. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 417-426 (2009).
4. Kramer, G., Boehringer, D., Ban, N. & Bukau, B. The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 589-597 (2009).
5. Grudnik, P., Bange, G. & Sinning, I. Protein targeting by the signal recognition particle. Biol. Chem. 390, 775-782 (2009).
6. Holtkamp, W. et al. Dynamic switch of the signal recognition particle from scanning to targeting. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1332-1337 (2012).
7. Huber, D. et al. SecA interacts with ribosomes in order to facilitate posttranslational translocation in bacteria. Mol. Cell 41, 343-353 (2011).
8. Driessen, A.J. & Nouwen, N. Protein translocation across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 643-667 (2008).
9. Oh, E. et al. Selective ribosome profiling reveals the cotranslational chaperone action of trigger factor in vivo. Cell 147, 1295-1308 (2011).
10. Agashe, V.R. et al. Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: increase in yield at the expense of folding speed. Cell 117, 199-209 (2004).
11. Hoffmann, A. et al. Concerted action of the ribosome and the associated chaperone trigger factor confines nascent polypeptide folding. Mol. Cell 48, 63-74 (2012).
12. Deuerling, E., Schulze-Specking, A., Tomoyasu, T., Mogk, A. & Bukau, B. Trigger factor and DnaK cooperate in folding of newly synthesized proteins. Nature 400, 693-696 (1999).
13. Teter, S.A. et al. Polypeptide flux through bacterial Hsp70: DnaK cooperates with Trigger Factor in chaperoning nascent chains. Cell 97, 755-765 (1999).
14. Kramer, G. et al. L23 protein functions as a chaperone docking site on the ribosome. Nature 419, 171-174 (2002).
15. Ball, L.A. & Kaesberg, P. Cleavage of the N-terminal formylmethionine residue from a bacteriophage coat protein in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 79, 531-537 (1973).
16. Housman, D., Gillespie, D. & Lodish, H.F. Removal of formyl-methionine residue from nascent bacteriophage f2 protein. J. Mol. Biol. 65, 163-166 (1972).
17. Mazel, D., Pochet, S. & Marliere, P. Genetic characterization of polypeptide deformylase, a distinctive enzyme of eubacterial translation. EMBO J. 13, 914-923 (1994).
18. Falconer, S.B. & Brown, E.D. New screens and targets in antibacterial drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 497-504 (2009).
19. Solbiati, J., Chapman-Smith, A., Miller, J.L., Miller, C.G. & Cronan, J.E. Jr. Processing of the N termini of nascent polypeptide chains requires deformylation prior to methionine removal. J. Mol. Biol. 290, 607-614 (1999).
20. Frottin, F. et al. The proteomics of N-terminal methionine cleavage. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, 2336-2349 (2006).
21. Pine, M.J. Kinetics of maturation of the amino termini of the cell proteins of Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 174, 359-372 (1969).
22. Bingel-Erlenmeyer, R. et al. A peptide deformylase-ribosome complex reveals mechanism of nascent chain processing. Nature 452, 108-111 (2008).
23. Ferbitz, L. et al. Trigger factor in complex with the ribosome forms a molecular cradle for nascent proteins. Nature 431, 590-596 (2004).
24. Baram, D. et al. Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome reveals its chaperone action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 12017-12022 (2005).
25. Schlnzen, F. et al. The binding mode of the trigger factor on the ribosome: implications for protein folding and SRP interaction. Structure 13, 1685-1694 (2005).
26. Addlagatta, A., Quillin, M.L., Omotoso, O., Liu, J.O. & Matthews, B.W. Identification of an SH3-binding motif in a new class of methionine aminopeptidases from Mycobacterium tuberculosis suggests a mode of interaction with the ribosome. Biochemistry 44, 7166-7174 (2005).
27. Haldimann, A. & Wanner, B.L. Conditional-replication, integration, excision, and retrieval plasmid-host systems for gene structure-function studies of bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6384-6393 (2001).
28. Link, A.J., Robison, K. & Church, G.M. Comparing the predicted and observed properties of proteins encoded in the genome of Escherichia coli K-12. Electrophoresis 18, 1259-1313 (1997).
29. Nakatogawa, H. & Ito, K. The ribosomal exit tunnel functions as a discriminating gate. Cell 108, 629-636 (2002).
30. Bhushan, S. et al. SecM-stalled ribosomes adopt an altered geometry at the peptidyl transferase center. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000581 (2011).
31. Voss, N.R., Gerstein, M., Steitz, T.A. & Moore, P.B. The geometry of the ribosomal polypeptide exit tunnel. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 893-906 (2006).
32. Condon, C., Liveris, D., Squires, C., Schwartz, I. & Squires, C.L. rRNA operon multiplicity in Escherichia coli and the physiological implications of rrn inactivation. J. Bacteriol. 177, 4152-4156 (1995).
33. Ragusa, S., Blanquet, S. & Meinnel, T. Control of peptide deformylase activity by metal cations. J. Mol. Biol. 280, 515-523 (1998).
34. Neira, J.L. & Fersht, A.R. Acquisition of native-like interactions in C-terminal fragments of barnase. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 421-432 (1999).
35. Kaiser, C.M., Goldman, D.H., Chodera, J.D., Tinoco, I. Jr. & Bustamante, C. The ribosome modulates nascent protein folding. Science 334, 1723-1727 (2011).
36. O'Brien, E.P., Christodoulou, J., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C.M. New scenarios of protein folding can occur on the ribosome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 26, 513-526 (2011).
37. Hoffmann, A. et al. Trigger factor forms a protective shield for nascent polypeptides at the ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 6539-6545 (2006).
38. Bornemann, T., Jockel, J., Rodnina, M.V. & Wintermeyer, W. Signal sequence-independent membrane targeting of ribosomes containing short nascent peptides within the exit tunnel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 494-499 (2008).
39. Schierle, C.F. et al. The DsbA signal sequence directs efficient, cotranslational export of passenger proteins to the Escherichia coli periplasm via the signal recognition particle pathway. J. Bacteriol. 185, 5706-5713 (2003).
40. Giglione, C., Vallon, O. & Meinnel, T. Control of protein life-span by N-terminal methionine excision. EMBO J. 22, 13-23 (2003).
41. Schuwirth, B.S. et al. Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 A resolution. Science 310, 827-834 (2005).
42. Jensen, C.G. & Pedersen, S. Concentrations of 4.5S RNA and Ffh protein in Escherichia coli: the stability of Ffh protein is dependent on the concentration of 4.5S RNA. J. Bacteriol. 176, 7148-7154 (1994).
43. Milligan, D.L. & Koshland, D.E. Jr. The amino terminus of the aspartate chemoreceptor is formylmethionine. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4455-4460 (1990).
44. Huber, D. et al. Use of thioredoxin as a reporter to identify a subset of Escherichia coli signal sequences that promote signal recognition particle-dependent translocation. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2983-2991 (2005).
45. Rutkowska, A. et al. Dynamics of trigger factor interaction with translating ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4124-4132 (2008).
46. Starheim, K.K., Gevaert, K. & Arnesen, T. Protein N-terminal acetyltransferases: when the start matters. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 152-161 (2012).
47. Pechmann, S., Willmund, F. & Frydman, J. The ribosome as a hub for protein quality control. Mol. Cell 49, 411-421 (2013).
48. Merz, F. et al. Molecular mechanism and structure of Trigger Factor bound to the translating ribosome. EMBO J. 27, 1622-1632 (2008).
49. Andrasson, C., Fiaux, J., Rampelt, H., Mayer, M.P. & Bukau, B. Hsp110 is a nucleotide-activated exchange factor for Hsp70. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 8877-8884 (2008).
50. Deutscher, M.P., Marlor, C.W. & Zaniewski, R. Ribonuclease T: new exoribonuclease possibly involved in end-turnover of tRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 4290-4293 (1984).
51. Rutkowska, A. et al. Large-scale purification of ribosome-nascent chain complexes for biochemical and structural studies. FEBS Lett. 583, 2407-2413 (2009).
52. Datsenko, K.A. & Wanner, B.L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640-6645 (2000).
53. Groche, D. et al. Isolation and crystallization of functionally competent Escherichia coli peptide deformylase forms containing either iron or nickel in the active site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 246, 342-346 (1998).
54. Lowther, W.T., Zhang, Y., Sampson, P.B., Honek, J.F. & Matthews, B.W. Insights into the mechanism of Escherichia coli methionine aminopeptidase from the structural analysis of reaction products and phosphorus-based transition-state analogues. Biochemistry 38, 14810-14819 (1999).
55. Sali, A. & Blundell, T.L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 (1993).
56. Dolinsky, T.J. et al. PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W522-W525 (2007).
57. Wang, J.M., Cieplak, P. & Kollman, P.A. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules J. Comput. Chem. 21, 1049-1074 (2000).
58. Baker, N.A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M.J. & McCammon, J.A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041 (2001).
59. Gabdoulline, R.R. & Wade, R.C. Analytically defined surfaces to analyze molecular interaction properties. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 341-353, 374-375 (1996).
60. Motiejunas, D. et al. Protein-protein docking by simulating the process of association subject to biochemical constraints. Proteins 71, 1955-1969 (2008).