The influence of substitute materials on bone density after maxillary sinus augmentation: A microcomputed tomography study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1541-1546

  Kühl, Sebastian ^a   Götz, Hermann ^b   Brochhausen, Christoph ^b   Jakse, Norbert ^c   Filippi, Andreas ^a   D’Hoedt, Bernd ^a   Kreisler, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Bone replacement materials; Maxillary sinus floor augmentation; Microcomputed tomography

Indexed keywords

BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; AGED; ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; TIME; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; DURAPATITE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DROPOUTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; WOUND HEALING; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84880168706     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1980; 38: 613-619.
2. Tatum OH. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30: 207-229.
3. Hürzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: A 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 466-475.
4. Hürzeler MB, Quinones CR, Kirsch A, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 476-486.
5. Quinones CR, Hürzeler MB, Schuepbach P, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys. Part II. Evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 87-96.
6. Wallace SS, Froum ST. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 328-343.
7. Szabo G, Huys L, Coulthard P, et al. A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 371-381.
8. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 94-102.
9. Kreisler M, Moritz O, Weihe CH, d’Hoedt B. Die externe Sinusbodenelevation vor dem Hintergrund der Evidenzbasierten Medizin, Teil I [in German]. J Dent Implant 2006; 22: 299-323.
10. Kreisler M, Moritz O, Weihe CH, d’Hoedt B. Die externe Sinusbodenelevation vor dem Hintergrund der Evidenzbasierten Medizin, Teil II [in German]. J Dent Implant 2007; 23: 68-86.
11. Froum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Sinus floor elevation using bovine bone mineral (OsteoGraf/N) with and without autogenous bone: A clinical, histologic, radiographic and histomorphometric analysis-Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18: 528-543.
12. Hallman M, Sennersby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20: 80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 635-643.
13. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine substitute material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 53-58.
14. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2: 1 autogenous/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 339-345.
15. Guarnieri R, Grassi R, Ripari M, Pecora G. Maxillary sinus augmentation using granular calcium sulfate (surgiplaster sinus): Radiographic and histologic study at 2 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 79-85.
16. Wanschitz F, Figl M, Wagner A, Ewers R. Measurement of volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with phycogenic hydroxyapatite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 422-438.
17. Johansson LA, Isaksson S, Lindh C, Becktor JP, Sennerby L. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous implant placement using locally harvested autogenous bone chips and bone debris: A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 68: 837-844.
18. Caubet J, Petzold C, Sáez-Torres C, et al. Sinus graft with safescraper: 5-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 482-490.
19. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 217-229.
20. Maiorana C, Sigurta D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F. Sinus elevation with alloplast or xenogenic materials and implants: An up-to-4-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 426-432.
21. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD008397.
22. Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, Weinreb M. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus grafting procedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type and residual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 193-199.
23. Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Carmeli G, Lev-Dor R, Dard M, Nemcovsky CE. Histomorphometric assessment of bone formation in sinus augmentation utilizing a combination of autogenous and hydroxyapatite/ biphasic tricalcium phosphate graft materials: At 6 and 9 months in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 686-692.
24. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: A comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 197-207.
25. Hürzeler MB, Quinones CR, Kirsch A, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part III. Evaluation of autogenous bone combined with porous hydroxyapatite. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 401-411.
26. Glowacki J, Altobelli D, Mulliken JB. Fate of mineralized and demineralized osseous implants in cranial defects. Calcif Tissue Int 1981; 33: 71-76.
27. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J, Kaban LB, Folkman J, Murray JE. Use of demineralized allogenic bone implants for the correction of maxillocranial deformities 2. Ann Surg 1981; 194: 366-372.
28. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4: 3-11.
29. Trisi P, Rebaudi A, Calvari F, Lazzara RJ. Sinus graft with Biogran, autogenous bone, and PRP: A report of three cases with histology and micro-CT. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 113-125.
30. Kühl S, Götz H, Hansen T, et al. Three dimensional analysis of bone formation after maxillary sinus augmentation by means of micro computerized tomography (µ-CT): A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 930-938.
31. Van Lenthe HG, Hagenmüller H, Bohner M, Hollister JS, Meinel L, Müller R. Nondestructive micro-computed tomography for biological imaging and quantification of scaffold-bone interaction in vivo. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2479-2490.
32. Rebaudi A, Trisi P, Cella R, Cecchini G. Preoperative evaluation of bone quality and bone density using a novel CT/micro CT-based hard-normal-soft classification system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 75-85.
33. Park HM. Hypothesis Testing and Statistical Power of a Test. Working Paper. The University Information Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing, Indiana University, 2010: 13. http://www.indiana.edu/-statmath/stat/all/power/ index.html. Accessed 5 September 2012.
34. Detsch R, Mayr H, Ziegler G. Formation of osteoclast-like cells on HA and TCP ceramics. Acta Biomater 2008; 4: 139-148.
35. Walsh RW, Vizesi F, Michael D, et al. Beta-TCP bone graft substitutes in a bilateral rabbit tibial defect model. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 266-271.
36. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 174: 28-42.
37. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 124-133.