Variations in health care, patient preferences, and high-quality decision making

JAMA

Volumn 310, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 151-152

  Krumholz, Harlan M ^a,b,c,d  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; MALE; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICARE; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLANS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICARE; MEDICARE PART C; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION;

EID: 84880168173     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.7835     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Wennberg JE. Tracking Medicine: A Researcher's Quest to Understand Health Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.
2. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
3. Fagerlin A, Sepucha KR, Couper MP, Levin CA, Singer E, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Patients' knowledge about 9 commonhealth conditions: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(5)(suppl): 35S-52S.
4. Holmboe ES, Fiellin DA, Cusanelli E, Remetz M, Krumholz HM. Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):632-637.
5. Krumholz HM, Barreto-Filho JA, Jones PG, Li Y, Spertus JA. Decision-making preferences among patients with an acutemyocardial infarction [published online ahead of print June 10, 2013]. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6057.
6. Krumholz HM, Phillips RS, Hamel MB, et al Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Circulation. 1998;98(7):648-655. (Pubitemid 28387491)
7. Sepucha KR, Levin CA, Uzogara EE, Barry MJ, O'Connor AM, Mulley AG. Developing instruments to measure the quality of decisions: early results for a set of symptom-driven decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):504-510.
8. Fowler FJ Jr, Gallagher PM, Bynum JP, Barry MJ, Lucas FL, Skinner JS. Decision-making process reported by Medicare patients who had coronary artery stenting or surgery for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(8):911-916.
9. Ko DT, Tu JV, Austin PC, et al. Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario. JAMA. 2013;310(2):163-169.
10. Matlock DD, Groeneveld PW, Sidney S, et al. Geographic variation in cardiovascular procedure use among Medicare fee-for-service vs Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. JAMA. 2013;310(2):155-162.
11. Ko DT, Tu JV, Samadashvili Z, et al. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario. Circulation. 2010;121(24):2635-2644.
12. Ko DT, Wang Y, Alter DA, et al. Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acutemyocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(7):716-723. (Pubitemid 351227417)
13. Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ Jr, Mulley AG Jr. Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation(suppl variation):VAR54-VAR62.
14. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333(7565):417.
15. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25-30.
16. Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Silvia K, Partridge A, Mulley AG Jr. An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):261-269. (Pubitemid 46073568)
17. Krumholz HM. Informed consent to promote patient-centered care. JAMA. 2010;303(12):1190-1191.
18. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(10):CD001431.
19. Arnold SV, Decker C, Ahmad H, et al. Converting the informed consent from a perfunctory process to an evidence-based foundation for patient decision making. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008;1(1):21-28.
20. Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(4):435-441. (Pubitemid 38988952)
21. Hess EP, Knoedler MA, Shah ND, et al. The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(3):251-259.