Designing enterprise integration solutions - Effectively

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 145-158

  Umapathy, Karthikeyan ^a   Purao, Sandeep ^b   Barton, Russell R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN OUTCOMES; DESIGN SCIENCE; DESIGN SOLUTIONS; ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION; LEGACY APPLICATIONS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; RESEARCH;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84880160953     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d., Hofstede, A.H.M.t., Kiepuszewski, B., and Barros, A.P. "Workflow Patterns," Distributed and Parallel Databases (14:1), July 2003a, pp 5-51.
2. Aalst, W.M.P.v.d., Hofstede, A.H.M.t., and Weske, M. "Business Process Management: A Survey," Business Process Management (BPM): International Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2003b, pp. 1 - 12.
3. Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V. "Principles and Models for Organizing the IT Function," MIS Quarterly Executive (1:1) 2002.
4. Alencar, P., Cowan, D., Dong, J., and Lucena, C. "A Pattern-Based Approach to Structural Design Composition," International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 1999, pp. 160-165.
5. Barros, A., Dumas, M., and Hofstede, A.H.M.t. "Service Interaction Patterns," Business Process Management, Springer Verlag, Nancy, France, 2005, pp. 302-318.
6. Bossam "Bossam Rule/OWL Reasoner," Minsu Jang. http://mknows.etri.re.kr/bossam/FrontPage
7. BoxCoxSPSS "Box-Cox transformation SPSS Syntax," Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 1998.
8. BPMN "Business Process Modeling Notation Specification," Object Management Group, Inc. (OMG). http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/ OMG%20Final%20Adopted%20BPMN%201-0%20Spec%2006-02-01.pdf
9. Brocke, J.v., and Buddendick, C. "Reusable Conceptual Models - Requirements Based on the Design Science Research Paradigm," International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), Claremont, California, 2006, pp. 576 - 604.
10. Carlsson, S.A. "Towards an Information Systems Design Research Framework: A Critical Realist Perspective," International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), 2006, pp. 192 - 212.
11. Eickelmann, N.S., and Richardson, D.J. "An evaluation of software test environment architectures," International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) IEEE, Berlin, Germany, 1996, pp. 353-364.
12. Fielding, A.H., and Bell, J.F. "A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models," Environmental Conservation (24:1) 1997, pp 38-49.
13. Frank, U. "Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO) conceptual framework and modeling languages," Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2002, pp. 1258-1267.
14. Gero, J.S. "Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design," AI Magazine (11:4) 1990, pp 26-36.
15. Girczyc, E., and Carlson, S. "Increasing design quality and engineering productivity through design reuse," International Conference on Design Automation, ACM Press, Dallas, Texas, United States, 1993, pp. 48-53.
16. Gleghorn, R. "Enterprise Application Integration: A Manager's Perspective," IT Professional (7:6) 2005, pp 17-23.
17. Goldkuhl, G., and Ågerfalk, P.J. "Actability: A Way to Understand Information Systems Pragmatics," International Workshop on Organisational Semiotics, Staffordshire University, Stafford, UK, 2000.
18. Gorton, I. "A Guide to Middleware Architectures and Technologies," in: Essential Software Architecture, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006, pp. 41-90.
19. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., and Ram, S. "Design Science in Information Systems Research," MIS Quarterly (28:1) 2004, pp 75-105.
20. Hohpe, G., and Woolf, B. Enterprise Integration Patterns Addison-Wesley, 2004.
21. Jankowski, D. "Computer-Aided Systems Engineering Methodology Support and Its Effect on the Output of Structured Analysis," Empirical Software Engineering (V2:1) 1997, pp 11-38.
22. Johannesson, P., and Perjons, E. "Design Principles for Process Modelling in Enterprise Application Integration," Information Systems (26:3) 2001, pp 165-184.
23. Lee, J., Siau, K., and Hong, S. "Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI," Communications of the ACM (46:2) 2003, pp 54-60.
24. Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C., and Morgan, G.A. SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation, (3rd ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.
25. Lim, S.H., Juster, N., and Pennington, A.d. "The Seven Major Aspects of Enterprise Modelling and Integration: A Position Paper," ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin (18:1) 1997, pp 71 - 75
26. Lind, M., and Goldkuhl, G. "Generic Layered Patterns for Business Modelling," International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP)) 2001.
27. Markus, M.L., and Tanis, C. "The Enterprise Systems Experience-From Adoption to Success," in: Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future through the Past, R.W. Zmud (ed.), Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH, 2000, pp. 173-207.
28. Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.
29. Moody, D.L., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., and Sølvberg, A. Evaluating the Quality of Process Models: Empirical Testing of a Quality Framework, Tampere, Finland, 2002, pp. 380-396.
30. Moore, S.A. "A Foundation for Flexible Automated Electronic Communication," Information Systems Research (12:1), March 2001, pp 34-62.
31. Morgan, G.A., Leech, N.L., Gloeckner, G.W., and Barrett, K.C. SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation, (3rd ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.
32. OWL "OWL Web Ontology Language Overview," W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
33. Popkin, J. "Improving Regulatory Compliance With Business Process Modeling," Business Integration Journal. http://bijonline.com/index.cfm? section=article&aid=212
34. Prechelt, L. "Accelerating learning from experience: avoiding defects faster," IEEE Software (18:6) 2001, pp 56-61.
35. Purao, S., Storey, V.C., and Han, T. "Improving Analysis Pattern Reuse in Conceptual Design: Augmenting Automated Processes with Supervised Learning," Information Systems Research (14:3) 2003, pp 269-290.
36. Purcell, T., and Sodersten, K. "Design Education, Reflective Practice, and Design Research," Design Thinking Research Symposium Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 2001.
37. Searle, J.R. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1969.
38. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001.
39. Sjoeberg, D.I.K., Hannay, J.E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V.B., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N.K., and Rekdal, A.C. "A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering," Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on (31:9) 2005, pp 733-753.
40. Sowa, J.F. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 2000.
41. SPSS "SPSS for Windows," SPSS Inc, 2006.
42. Stevens, J.P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, (4 ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
43. Tahvildar, L., and Kontogiannis, K. "Improving design quality using meta-pattern transformations: a metric-based approach," Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice (16:4-5) 2004, pp 331-361.
44. Terminology, W. "Workflow Management Coalition Terminology & Glossary," The Workflow Management Coalition Specification. http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1011-term-glossary-v3.pdf
45. Tvedt, J.D., and Collofello, J.S. "Evaluating the effectiveness of process improvements on software development cycle time via system dynamics modelling," International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), IEEE, Dallas, Texas, USA, 1995, pp. 318-325.
46. Umapathy, K., and Purao, S. "Designing Enterprise Solutions with Web Services and Integration Patterns," IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), IEEE Computer Society, 2006, pp. 111-118.
47. Umapathy, K., and Purao, S. "Exploring Alternatives for Representing and Accessing Design Knowledge about Enterprise Integration," International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER), Auckland, New Zealand 2007.
48. UML "Unified Modeling Language," Object Management Group (OMG). http://www.uml.org/
49. Vokáč, M., Tichy, W., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Arisholm, E., and Aldrin, M. "A Controlled Experiment Comparing the Maintainability of Programs Designed with and without Design Patterns-A Replication in a Real Programming Environment," Empirical Software Engineering (9:3) 2004, pp 149-195.
50. Wasserman, A.I. "Toward a discipline of software engineering," IEEE Software (13:6) 1996, pp 23-31.
51. Weber, R. "Editor's Comments: Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact," MIS Quarterly (27:2) 2003, pp iii - xi.
52. WSDL-Adjuncts "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts," W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts/
53. Zhu, J., Tian, Z., Li, T., Sun, W., Ye, S., Ding, W., Wang, C.C., Wu, G., Weng, L., Huang, S., Liu, B., and Chou, D. "Model-driven business process integration and management: A case study with the Bank SinoPac regional service platform," IBM Journal of Research and Development (48:5/6) 2004, pp 649-670.