Spatial scaling for digital soil mapping

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 890-902

  Malone, Brendan P ^a   McBratney, Alex B ^a   Minasny, Budiman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL SOIL MAPPINGS; GRID-SPACINGS; INFORMATION PRODUCTS; PREDICTION SUPPORT; SCALING PROCEDURES; SCALING PROCESS; SPATIAL SCALE; SPATIAL SCALING;

CONVOLUTION; SOIL SURVEYS;

SOILS;

DECONVOLUTION; DIGITAL MAPPING; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; RESOLUTION; SOIL SURVEY;

EID: 84880147386     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: 14350661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0419     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Addiscott, T.M. 1993. Simulation modelling and soil behaviour. Geoderma 60:15-40. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(93)90016-E.
2. Addiscott, T.M., and N.A. Mirza. 1998. New paradigms for modelling mass transfers in soils. Soil Tillage Res. 47:105-109. doi:10.1016/S0167- 1987(98)00081-6.
3. Bierkens, M.F.P., P.A. Finke, and P. de Willigen. 2000. Upscaling and downscaling methods for environmental research. Kluwer, Academic Publ., Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
4. Bishop, T.F.A., A.B. McBratney, and B.M. Whelan. 2001. Measuring the quality of digital soil maps using information criteria. Geoderma 103:95-111. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00071-4.
5. Bloschl, G. 2005. Statistical upscaling and downscaling in hydrology. In: M.G. Anderson and J.J. McDonnell, editors, Encyclopaedia of hydrological sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
6. Box, G.E.P., and D.R. Cox. 1964. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 26:211-252.
7. Brus, D.J., and J.J. deGruijter. 1997. Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 80:1-44. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00072-4.
8. Brus, D.J., B. Kempen, and G.B.M. Heuvelink. 2011. Sampling for validation of digital soil maps. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62:394-407. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2389.2011.01364.x.
9. Burgess, T.M., and R. Webster. 1980. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. 2. Block kriging. J. Soil Sci. 31:333-341. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02085.x.
10. Christensen, W.F. 2011. Filtered kriging for spatial data with heterogeneous measurement error variances. Biometrics 67:947-957. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01563.x.
11. Costanza, R., and T. Maxwell. 1994. Resolution and predictability: An approach to the scaling problem. Landscape Ecol. 9:47-57. doi:10.1007/ BF00135078.
12. Cressie, N. 1996. Change of support and the modifiable areal unit problem. Geographical Systems 3:159-180.
13. Cressie, N., and C.K. Wikle. 2011. Statistics for spatio-temporal data. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
14. Crutzen, P.J. 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature (London) 415:23. doi:10.1038/415023a.
15. Delhomme, J.P. 1978. Kriging in the hydosciences. Adv. Water Resour. 1:251- 266. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(78)90039-8.
16. de Young, B., M. Barange, G. Beaugrand, R. Harris, R.I. Perry, M. Scheffer, and F. Werner. 2008. Regime shifts in marine ecosystems: Detection, prediction and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:402-409. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.008.
17. Dungan, J.L., J.N. Perry, M.R.T. Dale, P. Legendre, S. Citron-Pousty, M.J. Fortin et al. 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25:626-640. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x.
18. Finke, P.A., J. Bouma, and M.R.E. Hoosbeek. 1998. Soil and water quality at different scales. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
19. Fuentes, M., and A.E. Raftery. 2005. Model evaluation and spatial interpolation by Bayesian combinations of observations with outputs from numerical models. Biometrics 61:36-45. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030821.x.
20. Goovaerts, P. 2008. Kriging and semivariogram deconvolution in the presence of irregular geographical units. Mathematical Geosciences 40:101-128. doi:10.1007/s11004-007-9129-1.
21. Goovaerts, P. 2010. Combining areal and point data in geostatistical interpolation: Applications to soil science and medical geography. Mathematical Geosciences 42:535-554. doi:10.1007/s11004-010-9286-5.
22. Goovaerts, P. 2011. A coherent geostatistical approach for combining choropleth map and field data in the spatial interpolation of soil properties. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62:371-380. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01368.x.
23. Gotway, C.A., and L.J. Young. 2002. Combining incompatible spatial data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97:632-648. doi:10.1198/016214502760047140.
24. Gotway, C.A., and L.J. Young. 2007. A geostatistical approach to linking geographically aggregated data from different sources. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 16:115-135 10.1198/106186007x179257. doi:10.1198/106186007X179257.
25. Grunwald, S., J.A. Thompson, and J.L. Boettinger. 2011. Digital soil mapping and modelling at continental scales: Finding solutions for global issues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75:1201-1213. doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0025.
26. Hengl, T. 2006. Finding the right pixel size. Comp. Geosci. 32:1283-1298. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.008.
27. Heuvelink, G.B.M. and E.J. Pebesma. 1999. Spatial aggregation and soil process modelling. Geoderma 89:47-65. doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00077-9.
28. Hoosbeek, M.R., and R.B. Bryant. 1992. Towards the quantitative modelling of pedogenesis-A review. Geoderma 55:183-210. doi:10.1016/0016- 7061(92)90083-J.
29. Isaaks, E.H., and R.M. Srivastava. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
30. Kerry, R., P. Goovaerts, B.G. Rawlins, and B.P. Marchant. 2012. Disaggregation of legacy soil data using area to point kriging for mapping soil organic carbon at the regional scale. Geoderma 170:347-358. doi:10.1016/j. geoderma.2011.10.007.
31. Kyriakidis, P.C. 2004. A geostatistical framework for area-to-point spatial interpolation. Geogr. Anal. 36:259-289 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2004.tb01135. x.
32. Lagacherie, P. 2008. Digital soil mapping: A state of the art. In: A.E. Hartemink, A.B. McBratney, and M.L. Mendonca Santos, editors, Digital soil mapping with limited data. Springer Sci., Australia. p. 3-14.
33. Lagacherie, P., J.S. Bailly, P. Monestiez, and C. Gomez. 2012. Using scattered hyperspectral imagery data to map the soil properties of a region. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 63:110-119. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01409.x.
34. Lark, R.M. 2005. Exploring scale-dependent correlation of soil properties by nested sampling. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 56:307-317. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2389.2004.00672.x.
35. Lesch, S.M., D.J. Strauss, and J.D. Rhoades. 1995. Spatial prediction of soil salinity using electromagnetic induction techniques. 1. Statistical prediction models- a comparison of multiple linear regression and co-kriging. Water Resour. Res. 31:373-386 10.1029/94wr02179. doi:10.1029/94WR02179.
36. Lin, L.I. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255-268. doi:10.2307/2532051.
37. Malone, B.P., A.B. McBratney, B. Minasny, and I. Wheeler. 2012. A general method for downscaling earth resource information. Comput. Geosci. 41:119-125. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.021.
38. McBratney, A.B. 1998. Some considerations on methods for spatially aggregating and disaggregating soil information. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 50:51-62 10.1023/a:1009778500412. doi:10.1023/A:1009778500412.
39. McBratney, A.B., I.O.A. Odeh, T.F.A. Bishop, M.S. Dunbar, and T.M. Shatar. 2000. An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97:293-327. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00043-4.
40. Nguyen, H., N. Cressie, and A. Braverman. 2010. Spatial statistical data fusion for remote-sensing application. Technical Rep. 849. Dep. of Statistics, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
41. Odeh, I.O.A., A.B. McBratney, and D.J. Chittleborough. 1995. Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes- heterotopic cokriging and regression kriging. Geoderma 67:215-226. doi:10.1016/0016- 7061(95)00007-B.
42. Papritz, A., C. Herzig, F. Borer, and R. Bono. 2005. Modelling the spatial distribution of copper in the soils around a smelter in north-eastern Switzerland. In: P. Renard, H. Demougeot-Renard, and R. Froidevaux, editors, Geostatistics for environmental applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 343-354.
43. Pettitt, A.N., and A.B. McBratney. 1993. Sampling designs for estimating spatial variance components. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 42:185-209.
44. Sanchez, P.A. 2010. Tripling crop yields in tropical Africa. Nat. Geosci. 3:299- 300. doi:10.1038/ngeo853.
45. Stein, A., J. Riley, and N. Halberg. 2001. Issues of scale for environmental indicators. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 87:215-232. doi:10.1016/S0167- 8809(01)00280-8.
46. Taylor, J.A., F. Jacob, M. Galleguillos, L. Prevot, N. Guix, and P. Lagacherie. 2013. The utility of remotely-sensed vegetative and terrain covariates at different spatial resolutions in modelling soil and watertable depth (for digital soil mapping). Geoderma 193:83-93. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma. 2012.09.009.
47. Tsegaye, T.D., W.L. Crosson, C.A. Laymon, M.P. Schamschula, and A.B. Johnson. 2003. Application of neural network-based spatial disaggregation scheme for addressing scaling of soil moisture. In: Y. Pachepsky, D.E. Radcliffe, and H. Magdi Selim, editors, Scaling Methods in Soil Physics. CRC Press, USA.
48. Turner, D.P., W.B. Cohen, and R.E. Kennedy. 2000. Alternative spatial resolutions and estimation of carbon flux over a managed forest landscape in Western Oregon. Landscape Ecol. 15:441-452 10.1023/a:1008116300063. doi:10.1023/A:1008116300063.
49. Walter, C., A.B. McBratney, A. Douaoui, and B. Minasny. 2001. Spatial prediction of topsoil salinity in the Chelif Valley, Algeria, using local ordinary kriging with local variograms versus whole-area variogram. Aust. J. Soil Res. 39:259-272 10.1071/sr99114. doi:10.1071/SR99114.
50. Webster, R., and M.A. Oliver. 2001. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
51. Western, A.W., and G. Bloschl. 1999. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. J. Hydrol. 217:203-224. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00232-7.
52. Young, L.J., and C.A. Gotway. 2007. Linking spatial data from different sources: The effects of change of support. Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 21:589-600. doi:10.1007/s00477-007-0136-z.