Measuring same-sex sexual behaviour: The influence of the male social environment

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 91-100

  Bailey, Nathan W ^a   Hoskins, Jessica L ^a   Green, Jade ^a   Ritchie, Michael G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; Insect learning; Mate choice plasticity; Same sex sexual behaviour; Social environment

Indexed keywords

ENTOMOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLY; GENETIC STRUCTURE; LEARNING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HEXAPODA;

EID: 84880146991     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abbassi P., Burley N.T. Nice guys finish last: same-sex sexual behavior and pairing success in male budgerigars. Behavioral Ecology 2012, 23:775-782.
2. Adkins-Regan E. Development of sexual partner preference in the zebra finch: a socially monogamous, pair-bonding animal. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2002, 31:27-33.
3. Arthur B.I., Magnusson M.S. Microanalysis of Drosophila courtship behaviour. The Hidden Structure of Interaction: From Neurons to Culture Patterns 2005, 99-106. IOS Press, Amsterdam. L. Anolli, S. Duncan, M.S. Magnusson, G. Riva (Eds.).
4. Averhoff W.W., Richardson R.H. Pheromonal control of mating patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Behavior Genetics 1974, 4:207-225.
5. Bailey N.W. Love will tear you apart: different components of female choice exert contrasting selection pressures on male field crickets. Behavioral Ecology 2008, 19:960-966.
6. Bailey N.W. Mate choice plasticity in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: effects of social experience in multiple modalities. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2011, 65:2269-2278.
7. Bailey N.W., French N. Same-sex sexual behaviour and mistaken identity in male field crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Animal Behaviour 2012, 84:1031-1038.
8. Bailey N.W., Zuk M. Same-sex sexual behavior and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2009, 24:439-446.
9. Bailey N.W., Gray B., Zuk M. Acoustic experience shapes alternative mating tactics and reproductive investment in field crickets. Current Biology 2010, 20:845-849.
10. Bastock M. Agene mutation which changes a behavior pattern. Evolution 1956, 10:421-439.
11. Bastock M., Manning A. The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 1955, 8:85-111.
12. Bateson M., Healy S.D. Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005, 20:659-664.
13. Battesti M., Moreno C., Joly D., Mery F. Spread of social information and dynamics of social transmission within Drosophila groups. Current Biology 2012, 22:309-319.
14. Beeler A.E., Rauter C.M., Moore A.J. Mate discrimination by females in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis: the influence of male size on attractiveness to females. Ecological Entomology 2002, 27:1-6.
15. Chen C., Lee A.Y., Bowens N.M., Huber R., Kravitz E.A. Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2002, 99:5664-5668.
16. Cobb M., Connolly K., Burnet B. Courtship behaviour in the melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Behaviour 1985, 95:203-231.
17. Connolly K., Burnet B., Kearney M., Eastwood L. Mating speed and courtship behaviour of inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 1974, 48:61-74.
18. Cotton S., Small J., Pomiankowski A. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Current Biology 2006, 16:R755-R765.
19. Curcillo P.G., Tompkins L. The ontogeny of sex appeal in Drosophila melanogaster males. Behavior Genetics 1987, 17:81-86.
20. Dukas R. Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. Behavioral Ecology 2005, 16:800-804.
21. Dukas R. Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annual Reviews of Entomology 2008, 53:145-160.
22. Dukas R. Causes and consequences of male-male courtship in fruit flies. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:913-919.
23. Ejima A., Griffith L.C. Measurement of courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2007, 2007. pdb.prot4847.
24. Ewing A.W., Bennet-Clark H.C. The courtship songs of Drosophila. Behaviour 1968, 31:288-301.
25. Fabre C.C.G., Hedwig B., Conduit G., Lawrence P.A., Goodwin S.F., Casal J. Substrate-borne vibratory communication during courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology 2012, 22:1-6.
26. Field K.L., Waite T.A. Absence of female conspecifics induces homosexual behaviour in male guppies. Animal Behaviour 2004, 68:1381-1389.
27. Gavrilets S., Rice W.R. Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2006, 273:3031-3038.
28. Greenspan R.J., Ferveur J.-F. Courtship in Drosophila. Annual Reviews in Genetics 2000, 34:205-232.
29. Grosjean Y., Grillet M., Augustin H., Ferveur J.-F., Featherstone D.E. Aglial amino-acid transporter controls synapse strength and courtship in Drosophila. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:54-61.
30. Hammer M. The neural basis of associative reward learning in honeybees. Trends in Neurosciences 1997, 20:245-252.
31. Hoving H.J.T., Bush S.L., Robison B.H. Ashot in the dark: same-sex sexual behaviour in a deep-sea squid. Biology Letters 2011, 8:287-290.
32. Hutter P., Ashburner M. Genetic rescue of inviable hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. Nature 1987, 327:331-333.
33. Jackson L.L., Arnold M.T., Blomquist G.J. Surface lipids of Drosophila melanogaster: comparison of the lipids from female and male wild type and sex-linked yellow mutant. Insect Biochemistry 1981, 11:87-91.
34. Jonsson T., Kravitz E.A., Heinrich R. Sound production during agonistic behavior of male Drosophila melanogaster. Fly 2011, 5:29-38.
35. Kasumovic M.M., Brooks R.C. It's all who you know: the evolution of socially cued anticipatory plasticity as a mating strategy. Quarterly Review of Biology 2011, 86:181-197.
36. Kim Y.-K., Ehrman L. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. IV. Courtship. Behavior Genetics 1998, 28:57-65.
37. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 1982, 36:1-12.
38. Krupp J.J., Kent C., Billeter J.-C., Azanchi R., So A.K.-C., Schonfeld J.A., Smith B.P., Lucas C., Levine J.D. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology 2008, 18:1373-1383.
39. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1981, 78:3721-3725.
40. Lasbleiz C., Ferveur J.-F., Everaerts C. Courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster revisited. Animal Behaviour 2006, 72:1001-1012.
41. Levan K., Fedina T., Lewis S.M. Testing multiple hypotheses for the maintenance of male homosexual copulatory behavior in flour beetles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2009, 22:60-70.
42. Levine J.D. Gila and romance. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:8-10.
43. MacFarlane G.R., Blomberg S.P., Kaplan G., Rogers L.J. Same-sex sexual behavior in birds: expression is related to social mating system and state of development at hatching. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18:21-33.
44. McGraw K.J., Hill G.E. Induced homosexual behaviour in male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus): the 'Prisoner Effect'. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 1999, 11:197-201.
45. McRobert S.P., Tompkins L. Courtship of young males is ubiquitous in Drosophila melanogaster. Behavior Genetics 1983, 13:517-523.
46. McRobert S.P., Tompkins L. Two consequences of homosexual courtship performed by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila affinis males. Evolution 1988, 42:1093-1097.
47. Maklakov A.A., Bonduriansky R. Sex differences in survival costs of homosexual and heterosexual interactions: evidence from a fly and a beetle. Animal Behaviour 2009, 77:1375-1379.
48. Mery F., Varela S.A.M., Danchin E., Blanchet S., Parejo D., Coolen I., Wagner R.H. Public versus personal information for mate copying in an invertebrate. Current Biology 2009, 19:730-734.
49. Moore A.J., Brodie E.D., Wolf J.B. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 1997, 51:1352-1362.
50. Ödeen A., Moray C.M. Drosophila melanogaster virgins are more likely to mate with strangers than familiar flies. Naturwissenschaften 2008, 95:253-256.
51. Quinn W.G., Harris W.A., Benzer S. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1974, 71:708-712.
52. Real L. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. The American Naturalist 1990, 136:376-405.
53. Ritchie M.G. The shape of female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1996, 93:14628-14631.
54. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R.L. Essentials of Behavioral Research 1991, McGraw Hill, Boston, Massachusetts. 2nd edn.
55. Spieth H.T. Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annual Review of Entomology 1974, 19:385-405.
56. Svetec N., Ferveur J.-F. Social experience and pheromonal perception can change male-male interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. The Journal of Experimental Biology 2005, 208:891-898.
57. Wagner W.E.J. Measuring female mating preferences. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55:1029-1042.
58. Widemo F., Sæther S.A. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005, 14:26-31.