Predictions of protein-protein interfaces within membrane protein complexes

Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 148-157

  Asadabadi, Ebrahim Barzegari ^a   Abdolmaleki, Parviz ^a  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Interaction sites; Membrane proteins; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ALANINE; ASPARAGINE; ASPARTIC ACID; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLUTAMINE; GLYCINE; LEUCINE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; THREONINE; TYROSINE; VALINE;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; KERNEL METHOD; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 84880145188     PISSN: 20082835     EISSN: 20084625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Stagljar I, Fields S. Analysis of membrane protein interactions using yeast-based technologies. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27(11):559-563.
2. Ge H, Walhout AJ, Vidal M. Integrating 'omic' in-formation: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. Trends Genet 2003;19(10):551-560.
3. Maurel D, Kniazeff J, Mathis G, Trinquet E, Pin JP, Ansanay H. Cell surface detection of membrane protein interaction with homogeneous time-re-solved fluorescence resonance energy transfer tech-nology. Anal Biochem 2004;329(2):253-262.
4. Njus D. Fundamental principles of membrane bio-physics. Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University: Wayne State University; 2000.
5. Xia JF, Zhao XM, Song J, Huang DS. APIS: ac-curate prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces by combining protrusion index with solvent acces-sibility. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:174.
6. Liu B, Wang X, Lin L, Tang B, Dong Q. Prediction of protein binding sites in protein structures using hidden Markov support vector machine. BMC Bio-informatics 2009;10:381.
7. Bordner AJ. Predicting protein-protein binding sites in membrane proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:312.
8. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. Transmem-brane proteins in the protein data bank: identifi-cation and classification. Bioinformatics 2004;20 (17):2964-2972.
9. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmem-brane proteins in the protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Database issue):D275-278.
10. Wang G, Dunbrack RL. PISCES: a protein se-quence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19(12): 1589-1591.
11. Ahmad S, Gromiha M, Fawareh H, Sarai A. ASA view: database and tool for solvent accessibility representation in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:51.
12. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. TMDET: web server for detecting transmembrane regions of pro-teins by using their 3D coordinates. Bioinformatics 2005;21(7):1276-1277.
13. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25(17): 3389-3402.
14. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clus-tering and comparing large sets of protein or nu-cleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006;22(13): 1658-1659.
15. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(5):1792-1797.
16. Bordner AJ, Abagyan R. REVCOM: a robust Baye-sian method for evolutionary rate estimation. Bioin-formatics 2005;21(10):2315-2321.
17. Yen SJ, Lee YS. Cluster-based under-sampling ap-proaches for imbalanced data distributions. Expert Syst Appl 2009;36(3):5718-5727.
18. Drummond C, Holte RC. C4. 5, class imbalance, and cost sensitivity: Why under-sampling beats over-sampling. Workshop on Learning from Im-balanced Datasets II; 2003: Citeseer.
19. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reute-mann P, Witten IH. The WEKA Data Mining Soft ware: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 2009; 11(1).
20. Bach FR. Consistency of the group Lasso and multiple kernel learning. JMLR 2008;9:1179-1225.
21. Duchi J, Singer Y. Efficient online and batch learn-ing using forward backward splitting. JMLR 2009; 10:2873-2898.
22. Kowalski M. Sparse regression using mixed norms. Appl Comput Harmon 2009;27(3):303-324.
23. Negahban SN, Ravikumar P, Wainwright MJ, Yu B. A unified framework for high-dimensional an-alysis of $M$-estimators with decomposable re-gularizers. Statist Sci 2012;27(4):538-557.
24. Yuan M, Lin Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J Royal Statis-tical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2006;68(1):49-67.
25. Jahandideh S, Srinivasasainagendra V, Zhi D. Comprehensive comparative analysis and identi-fication of RNA-binding protein domains: Multi-class classification and feature selection. J Theor Biol 2012;312C:65-75.
26. Liu J, Ji S, Ye J. SLEP: Sparse learning with ef-ficient projections. 4.1 Version. Arizona State Uni-versity; 2009.
27. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer; 1999.
28. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1998.
29. Dimitriadou E, Hornik K, Leisch F, Meyer D, Weingessel A. Misc functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien. Available at cranr-projectorg/web/packages/e1071/indexhtml (verified 6 Apr 2009) R Foundation for Statistical Com-puting, Vienna, Austria; 2008.
30. Team RDC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria 2009.
31. Grabe M, Neu J, Oster G, Nollert P. Protein inter-actions and membrane geometry. Biophys J 2003; 84(2 Pt 1):854-868.
32. Cai YD, Zhou GP, Chou KC. Support vector ma-chines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition. Biophys J 2003;84(5):3257-3263.
33. Shen YZ, Ding YS, Gu Q, Chou KC. Identifying the hub proteins from complicated membrane pro-tein network systems. Med Chem 2010;6(3):165-173.
34. Park KJ, Gromiha MM, Horton P, Suwa M. Dis-crimination of outer membrane proteins using sup-port vector machines. Bioinformatics 2005;21(23): 4223-4229.
35. Naveed H, Jackups R Jr, Liang J. Predicting weakly stable regions, oligomerization state, and protein-protein interfaces in transmembrane domains of outer membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106(31):12735-12740.
36. Buchan DW, Ward SM, Lobley AE, Nugent TC, Bryson K, Jones DT. Protein annotation and model-ling servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(Web Server issue):W563-568.
37. Bradford JR, Westhead DR. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 2005;21(8): 1487-1494.
38. Chen H, Zhou HX. Prediction of interface residues in protein-protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: test against NMR data. Proteins 2005;61(1):21-35.
39. Qin S, Zhou HX. meta-PPISP: a meta web server for protein-protein interaction site prediction. Bio-informatics 2007;23(24):3386-3387.
40. Liang S, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34(13):3698-3707.
41. Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G. ProMate: a struc-ture based prediction program to identify the loca-tion of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 2004;338(1):181-199.
42. Porollo A, Meller J. Prediction-based fingerprints of protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2007;66 (3):630-645.
43. de Vries SJ, van Dijk AD, Bonvin AM. WHISCY: what information does surface conservation yield? Application to data-driven docking. Proteins 2006; 63(3):479-489.
44. Landau M, Mayrose I, Rosenberg Y, Glaser F, Martz E, Pupko T, et al. ConSurf2005: the pro-jection of evolutionary conservation scores of re-sidues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Web Server issue):W299-302.
45. Negi SS, Schein CH, Oezguen N, Power TD, Braun W. InterProSurf: a web server for predicting inter-acting sites on protein surfaces. Bioinformatics 2007;23(24):3397-3399.
46. Chang DT, Weng YZ, Lin JH, Hwang MJ, Oyang YJ. Protemot: prediction of protein binding sites with automatically extracted geometrical templates. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34(Web Server issue): W303-309.
47. Jordan RA, El-Manzalawy Y, Dobbs D, Honavar V. Predicting protein-protein interface residues using local surface structural similarity. BMC Bio-informatics 2012;13:41.
48. Joh NH, Min A, Faham S, Whitelegge JP, Yang D, Woods VL, et al. Modest stabilization by most hydrogen-bonded side-chain interactions in mem-brane proteins. Nature 2008;453(7199):1266-1270.