Design and implementation of a business process rules engine

DESRIST 2007 Conference Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 342-361

  Huang, Wayne ^a   Stohr, Edward A ^a  

^a STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business process management; Business process rules; Claim processing; Rule matching algorithm; Technology acceptance; User satisfaction

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; RULE MATCHING; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; USER SATISFACTION;

ALGORITHMS; ENGINES; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MAINTENANCE; RESEARCH;

DESIGN;

EID: 84880142260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Hevner, A., et al., Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 2004. 28(1): p. 75-105.
2. zur Muehlen, M., Workflow-based Process Controlling. 2004, Berlin: Logos Verlag.
3. Georgakopoulos, D., M. Hornick, and A. Sheth, An Overview of Workflow Management: From Process Modeling to Workflow Automation Infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 1995. 3: p. 119-153.
4. Hall, C. and P. Harmon, The 2006 BPTrends Report on Business Rules Products. 2006, Business Process Trends.
5. Morgan, T., Business Rules and Information Systems. 2003, Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
6. CODASYL, A Modern Appraisal of Decision Tables. 1982, Decision Table Task Group, ACM.
7. Moreno, G.A., M. Verhelle, and J. Vanthienen, An Overview of Decision Table Literature 1982-2000. 2000, K.U.Leuven.
8. Hay, D., K.A. Healy, and A. Kolber, GUIDE Business Rules Project Final Report. 2000, Business Rules Group.
9. Ross, R.G., Principle of the Business Rule Approach. 2003: Addison-Wesley.
10. von Halle, B., Business Rules Applied. 2001: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Huang, W., Business Process Rules Management: Challenges and Solutions. 2007, Dissertation Proposal, Howe School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology.
12. ACT-NET. The Active Database Management System Manifesto: A Rulebase of ADBMS Features. 1996: ACM SIGMOD Record.
13. Paton, N.W. and O. Diaz, Active Database Systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 1999. 31(1): p. 63-103.
14. Forgy, C.L., Rete: A Fast Algorithm for the Many Pattern/Many Object Pattern Match Problem. Artificial Intelligence, 1982. 19(1): p. 17-37.
15. Rankins, R., et al., Sybase SQL Server 11. 1999: Sams Publishing.
16. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 1989(August): p. 982-1003.
17. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 2000. 46(2): p. 186-204.
18. Venkatesh, V., et al., User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 2003. 27(3): p. 425-478.
19. Baroudi, J.J. and W.J. Orlikowski, A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1988(Spring): p. 44-59.
20. Doll, W.J., W. Xia, and G. Torkzedeh, A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-user Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 1994(December): p. 453-461.
21. Melone, N.P., A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research. Management Science, 1990. 36(1): p. 76-91.
22. Sunazuka, T., M. Azuma, and N. Yamagishi. Software Quality Assessment Technology. in 8th International Conference on Software Engineering. 1985. London, England.
23. Boehm, B., et al. Applying WinWin to Quality Requirements: A Case Study. in 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. 2001. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
24. Boehm, B.W., J.R. Brown, and L. M. Quantitative Evaluation of Software Quantity. in 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering. 1968: 1976.
25. Chisholm, M., How to Build a Business Rules Engine. 2004, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
26. Strong, D.M., Y.W. Lee, and R.Y. Wang, Data Quality in Context. Communications of ACM, 1997. 40(5): p. 103-110.
27. Miers, D., P. Harmon, and C. Hall, The 2006 BPM Suites Report. 2006, Business Process Trends.
28. Lienhard, H. and U.-M. Kunzi, Workflow and Business Rules - A Common Approach, in Workflow Handbook. 2005, Future Strategies, Inc. p. 129-139.
29. Stonebraker, M., E.N. Hanson, and C.-H. Hong. The Design of the POSTGRES Rules System. in International Conference on Data Engineering. 1987.
30. Dayal, U., et al., The HiPAC Project: Combining Active Databases and Timing Constraints. ACM SIGMOD Record, 1988. 17(1).
31. Haas, L.M., et al., Starburst Mid-Flight: As the Dust Clears. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1990.
32. Hanson, E.N., The Design and Implementation of the Ariel Active Database Rule System. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1996. 8(1): p. 157-172.
33. Dayal, U., E.N. Hanson, and J. Widom, Active Database Systems, in Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, The Interoperability, and Beyond, W. Kim, Editor. 1994, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
34. Casati, F., et al., Specification and Implementation of Exceptions in Workflow Management Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1999. 24(September): p. 405-451.
35. Kumar, A. and J.L. Zhao, Dynamic Routing and Operational Controls in Workflow Management Systems. Management Science, 1999. 45(2).
36. Geppert, A. and D. Tombros, Event-based Distributed Workflow Execution with EVE, in SWORDIES Report. 1998.