-
1
-
-
0020393290
-
Editing a scientific paper. II. Citations and a list of bibliographic references, [in Portugese]
-
Sauaia N, Sauaia MA. Editing a scientific paper. II. Citations and a list of bibliographic references [in Portugese]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1982;39:359-366.
-
(1982)
Arq Bras Cardiol
, vol.39
, pp. 359-366
-
-
Sauaia, N.1
Sauaia, M.A.2
-
2
-
-
0020212911
-
Editing a scientific manuscript [in Portugese]
-
Sauaia N, Sauaia MA. Editing a scientific manuscript [in Portugese]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1982;39:289-295.
-
(1982)
Arq Bras Cardiol
, vol.39
, pp. 289-295
-
-
Sauaia, N.1
Sauaia, M.A.2
-
3
-
-
0020618829
-
Writing a scientific paper. III. Tables [in Portugese]
-
Sauaia N, Sauaia MA. Writing a scientific paper. III. Tables [in Portugese]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1983;40:77-82.
-
(1983)
Arq Bras Cardiol
, vol.40
, pp. 77-82
-
-
Sauaia, N.1
Sauaia, M.A.2
-
4
-
-
84880098378
-
-
11/08/, Accessed December 24, 2012
-
EQUATORNetwork11/08/2012.Available at: http://www.equator-network.org/. Accessed December 24, 2012.
-
(2012)
EQUATORNetwork
-
-
-
5
-
-
16644373179
-
Howto write an effective discussion
-
Hess DR.Howto write an effective discussion. Respir Care. 2004;49:1238-1241.
-
(2004)
Respir Care
, vol.49
, pp. 1238-1241
-
-
Hess, D.R.1
-
6
-
-
84864571438
-
Evidence level of individual studies: A proposed framework for surgical research
-
Sauaia A, Moore EE, Crebs JL, Maier RV, Hoyt DB, Shackford SR. Evidence level of individual studies: a proposed framework for surgical research. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1484-1490.
-
(2012)
J Trauma Acute Care Surg.
, vol.72
, pp. 1484-1490
-
-
Sauaia, A.1
Moore, E.E.2
Crebs, J.L.3
Maier, R.V.4
Hoyt, D.B.5
Shackford, S.R.6
-
8
-
-
78149471763
-
The discussion section: Your closing argument
-
Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1671-1674.
-
(2010)
Clin Chem.
, vol.56
, pp. 1671-1674
-
-
Annesley, T.M.1
-
9
-
-
39749093168
-
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information
-
Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63:81-97.
-
(1956)
Psychol Rev.
, vol.63
, pp. 81-97
-
-
Miller, G.A.1
-
10
-
-
0038385080
-
Seven, plus orminus two, is toomuch to bear: Three (or fewer) is the realmagicnumber
-
Le Compte DC. Seven, plus orminus two, is toomuch to bear: three (or fewer) is the realmagicnumber. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 1999;43:289-292.
-
(1999)
Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet
, vol.43
, pp. 289-292
-
-
Le Compte, D.C.1
-
11
-
-
1442354597
-
Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement
-
Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361-366.
-
(2004)
Am J Public Health
, vol.94
, pp. 361-366
-
-
Des Jarlais, D.C.1
Lyles, C.2
Crepaz, N.3
-
12
-
-
69149107165
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
-
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264-269.
-
(2009)
Ann Intern Med.
, vol.151
, pp. 264-269
-
-
Moher, D.1
Liberati, A.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
13
-
-
77951709512
-
It was a cold and rainy night Set the scene with a good introduction
-
Annesley TM. "It was a cold and rainy night": set the scene with a good introduction. Clin Chem. 2010;56:708-713.
-
(2010)
Clin Chem.
, vol.56
, pp. 708-713
-
-
Annesley, T.M.1
-
14
-
-
70350776531
-
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report - part I
-
Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML.Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report - part I. Value Health. 2009;12:1044-1052.
-
(2009)
Value Health
, vol.12
, pp. 1044-1052
-
-
Berger, M.L.1
Mamdani, M.2
Atkins, D.3
Johnson, M.L.4
|