Between complexity and generalization: Addressing evaluation challenges with QCA

Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 269-283

  Befani, Barbara ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

causality; complexity; explanation; generalization; validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880104159     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1474022213493839     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BefaniB (2012a) Models of causality and causal inference. In: SternEStameNMayneJForssKDaviesRBefaniBBroadening the Range of Methods for Impact Evaluations, DFID Working Paper no. 38. URL: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/Output/189575/Default.aspx.
2. BefaniB (2012b) I fattori di successo dei giovani agricoltori che beneficiano della politica di sviluppo rurale: nuovi metodi e nuovi risultati. Rete Rurale Nazionale. URL: http://www.reterurale.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/10427.
3. Befani B,Ledermann S,Sager F.Realistic evaluation and QCA: conceptual parallels and an empirical application.Evaluation. 2007;13 (2): 171-92.
4. BradyH (2002) Models of causal inference: going beyond the Neyman-Rubin-Holland theory. Annual Meetings of the Political Methodology Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. URL: http://www.polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/brady02.pdf.
5. Rethinking Social Enquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Brady HCollier D, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004:.
6. Caren N,Panofsky A.tQCA: a technique for adding temporality to Qualitative Comparative Analysis.Sociological Methods Research. 2005;34 (2): 147-72.
7. Cartwright N,Hardie JEvidence-Based Policy: Doing it Better. A Practical Guide to Predicting if a Policy Will Work for You. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012:.
8. Cartwright N,Munro E.The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness.Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2010;16:260-6.
9. Cicchitelli G,Herzel A,Montanari GEIl Campionamento Statistico. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1992:.
10. De Meur G,Rihoux BL'Analyse Quali-Quantitative Comparée (AQQC-QCA). Approche, techniques et applications en sciences humaines. Louvain-la-neuve: Academia-Bruylant; 2002:.
11. Elster JNuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989:.
12. Elster JSocial Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Hedstrom PSwedberg R, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:.
13. Elster JExplaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
14. Fasanella A.Introduzione alla prima sezione.Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale. 2002;:68-9.
15. George A,Bennett ACase Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:.
16. Hedstrom PDissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
17. Ledermann S.Exploring the necessary conditions for evaluation use in program change.American Journal of Evaluation. 2012;33 (2): 159-78.
18. Mackie J.Causes and conditions.American Philosophical Quarterly. 1965;2 (4): 245-64.
19. Mackie JThe Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1974:.
20. Mill JSA System of Logic. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific; 2002:.
21. MorellJ (2012) Understanding sustainability - systems as a framework, thermodynamics as a metaphor. Available at: http://evaluationuncertainty.com/2012/11/18/understanding-sustainability-systems-as-a-framework-thermodynamics-as-a-metaphor/.
22. Pawson REvidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE; 2006:.
23. Pawson R,Tilley NRealistic Evaluation. London: SAGE; 1997:.
24. Ragin CThe Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1987:.
25. Rihoux B,Ragin CConfigurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2009:.
26. Rihoux B,Rezsöhazy I,Bol D.Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in public policy analysis: an extensive review.German Policy Studies. 2011;7 (3): 9-51.
27. Sager F.Policy coordination in the European metropolis: a meta-analysis.West European Politics. 2006;29 (3): 433-60.
28. Sager F,Andereggen C.Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis: the promise of Qualitative Comparative Analysis.American Journal of Evaluation. 2012;33 (1): 60-78.
29. Schneider C,Wagemann C.Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy.European Journal of Political Research. 2006;45 (5): 751-86.
30. Schneider C,Wagemann CSet-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012:.
31. Stiglitz J,Walsh CPrinciples of Macroeconomics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 2006:.
32. Vis B.The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-n analyses.Sociological Methods Research. 2012;41 (1): 168-98.
33. Weiss C.Theory-based evaluation: past, present, and future.New Directions for Evaluation. 1997;76:41-55.
34. Yin RKCase Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:.