Patient-specific model of arterial circulation for surgical planning of vascular access

Journal of Vascular Access

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 180-192

  Passera, Katia ^a   Manini, Simone ^a   Antiga, Luca ^a,b   Remuzzi, Andrea ^a,c  

^a MARIO NEGRI INST PHARMACOL RES   (Italy)

^b Orobix srl   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arteriovenous fistula; Clinical decision support systems; Patient specifc; Vascular model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL CIRCULATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE MODEL; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RISK FACTOR; SIMULATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; AGE; ARM; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT; ARTERY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY SIZE; BODY SURFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; VASCULARIZATION;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTERIES; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT, SURGICAL; BODY SIZE; BODY SURFACE AREA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PATIENT SELECTION; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RENAL DIALYSIS; SEX FACTORS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84880079327     PISSN: 11297298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000099     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. National Kidney Foundation: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access - Update 2006.
2. Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, et al. EBpG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(Suppl 2):ii88-ii117. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm021.
3. Mao SS, Ahmadi N, Shah B, et al. Normal thoracic aorta diameter on cardiac computed tomography in healthy asymptomatic adults: impact of age and gender. Acad radiol. 2008;15(7):827-834. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.001.
4. Hansen F, Mangell P, Sonesson B, länne T. Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery - variations with age and sex. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(1):1-9. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(94)00090-5.
5. Bjarnegård N, Ahlgren AR, Sandgren T, Sonesson B, länne T. Age affects proximal brachial artery stiffness; differential behavior within the length of the brachial artery? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(8):1115-1121. doi:10.1016/ S0301-5629(03)00052-8.
6. Henry RM, Kostense PJ, Spijkerman AM, et al; Hoorn Study. Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status: the Hoorn Study. circulation. 2003;107(16):2089-2095. doi:10.1161/01. cIr.0000065222.34933.Fc.
7. Reneman r S, van Merode T, Brands PJ, Hoeks AP. Inhomo-geneities in arterial wall properties under normal and pathological conditions. J Hypertens Suppl. 1992;10(6):S35-S39.
8. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, yokoi T, Tanaka H. Age-associated elongation of the ascending aorta in adults. JAcc cardio-vasc Imaging. 2009;2(3):378.
9. Igari TJ. The length of the aorta from the subclavian artery to the renal artery based on computed tomographic measurements in Japanese adults. Artif Organs. 2006;9(4):267-270. doi:10.1007/s10047-006-0346-z.
10. Vasavada AN, Danaraj J, Siegmund Gp. Head and neck anthropometry, vertebral geometry and neck strength in height-matched men and women. J Biomech. 2008;41(1):114-121. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.007.
11. Krejza J, Arkuszewski M, Kasner SE, et al. carotid artery diameter in men and women and the relation to body and neck size. Stroke. 2006;37(4):1103-1105. doi:10.1161/01. STr.0000206440.48756.f7.
12. Stergiopulos N, young DF, rogge Tr. computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J Biomech. 1992;25(12):1477-1488. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90060-E.
13. Drillis R, contini R. Body Segment parameters. New york, New york: Office of Vocational rehabilitation; 1966. report No.: No. 1166-03.
14. Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson LEJ, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. JAcc cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:200-209.
15. Kahraman H, Ozaydin M, Varol E, et al. The diameters of the aorta and its major branches in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33(4):463-468.
16. Van Merode T, Hick PJ, Hoeks AP, Smeets FA, Reneman RS. Differences in carotid artery wall properties between presumed-healthy men and women. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14(7):571-574. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(88)90123-8. B.
17. Sass C, Herbeth B, chapet O, Siest G, Visvikis S, Zannad F. Intima-media thickness and diameter of carotid and femoral arteries in children, adolescents and adults from the Stanislas cohort: effect of age, sex, anthropometry and blood pressure. J Hypertens. 1998;16(11):1593-1602. doi:10.1097/00004872-199816110-00005.
18. Denarie N, Gariepy J, chironi G, et al. Distribution of ultrasonographically-assessed dimensions of common carotid arteries in healthy adults of both sexes. Atherosclerosis. 1999;148(2):297-302. doi:10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00276-2.
19. Jensen-Urstad K, Jensen-Urstad M, Johansson J. Carotid artery diameter correlates with risk factors for cardiovascular disease in a population of 55-year-old subjects. Stroke. 1999;30(8):1572-1576. doi:10.1161/01.STr.30.8.1572.
20. Ruan L, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, et al. Correlates of common carotid artery lumen diameter in black and white younger adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Stroke. 2009;40(3):702-707. doi:10.1161/STrOKEAHA.108.531608.
21. Scheel P, Ruge C, Schöning M. Flow velocity and flow volume measurements in the extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries in healthy adults: reference data and the ef-fects of age. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(8):1261-1266. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00293-3.
22. Mitchell J. Differences between left and right suboccipi-tal and intracranial vertebral artery dimensions: an influence on blood flow to the hindbrain? physiother res Int. 2004;9(2):85-95. doi:10.1002/pri.305.
23. Nemati M, Bavil AS, Taheri N. Comparison of normal values of Duplex indices of vertebral arteries in young and elderly adults. cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009;7(1):2. doi:10.1186/1476-7120-7-2.
24. Smith WD, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH, Koval JJ. Body mass indices and skeletal size in 394 Canadians aged 55-86 years. Ann Hum Biol. 1995;22(4):305-314. doi:10.1080/03014469500003972.
25. Mitchell CO, Lipschitz DA. Arm length measurement as an alternative to height in nutritional assessment of the elderly. JpEN J parenter Enteral Nutr. 1982;6(3):226-229. doi:10.11 77/0148607182006003226.
26. Iwatsuki H, Iwatsuki J. Relationship of the lung Volume to Height, Arm Span, Upper Arm length and the Second Digital proximal phalangeal length. J phys Ther Sci. 1999;11(2):101-104. doi:10.1589/jpts.11.101.
27. Garneau CJ, parkinson MB. Including preference in Anthropometry-Driven Models for Design. J Mech Des N y. 2009; 131(10).
28. van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Hoeks AP, Boudier HA, van Bortel LM. Effect of age on brachial artery wall properties differs from the aorta and is gender dependent: a population study. Hypertension. 2000;35(2):637-642. doi:10.1161/01.Hyp.35.2.637.
29. Bjarnegård N, länne T. Arterial properties along the upper arm in humans: age-related effects and the consequence of anatomical location. J Appl physiol. 2010;108(1):34-38. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00479.2009.
30. Zamir M, Sinclair P, Wonnacott TH. Relation between diameter and flow in major branches of the arch of the aorta. J Biomech. 1992;25(11):1303-1310. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90285-9.
31. Haerle M, Häfner HM, Dietz K, Schaller HE, Brunel-li F. Vascular dominance in the forearm. plast recon-str Surg. 2003;111(6):1891-1898. doi:10.1097/01. prS.0000057529.76413.D7.
32. Minami T, Eisen LA, Berger JS, Sekiguchi H, Mayo pH, Narasimhan M. Gender disparity in radial and femoral arterial size: an ultrasound study. Intensive care Med. 2007;33(3):552-553. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0503-0.
33. Yoo BS, yoon J, Ko JY, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuos-ity. Int J cardiol. 2005;101(3):421-427. doi:10.1016/j.ij-card.2004.03.061.
34. Ene-Iordache B, Mosconi L, Antiga L, et al. Radial artery remodeling in response to shear stress increase within ar-teriovenous fistula for hemodialysis access. Endothelium. 2003;10(2):95-102. doi:10.1080/10623320303365.
35. Duprez DA, Swingen C, Sih R, lefebvre T, Kaiser DR, Jerosch-Herold M. Heterogeneous remodelling of the ascending and descending aorta with age. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21(8):689-691. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002216.
36. Studinger P, Lénárd Z, Reneman R, Kollai M. Measurement of aortic arch distension wave with the echo-track technique. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(8):1285-1291. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00264-7.
37. Benetos A, laurent S, Hoeks Ap, Boutouyrie pH, Safar ME. Arterial alterations with aging and high blood pressure. A noninvasive study of carotid and femoral arteries. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13(1):90-97. doi:10.1161/01. ATV.13.1.90.
38. laurent S, Girerd X, Mourad JJ, et al. Elastic modulus of the radial artery wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14(7):1223-1231. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.14.7.1223.
39. Van Merode T, Hick pJ, Hoeks AP, rahn KH, Reneman RS. Carotid artery wall properties in normotensive and borderline hypertensive subjects of various ages. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14(7):563-569. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(88)90122-6. A.
40. DuBois D, DuBois DF. A formula to estimate the approxi-mat surface area if height and weight are known. Arch Int Med 1916;17:863-871.
41. Huberts W, Bode AS, Kroon W, et al. A pulse wave propagation model to support decision-making in vascular access planning in the clinic. Med Eng phys. 2012;34(2):233-248. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.015.
42. Reymond P, Merenda F, perren F, Rüfenacht D, Stergiopulos N. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J physiol Heart circ physiol. 2009;297(1):H208-H222. doi:10.1152/ajp-heart.00037.2009.
43. Pavone P, Fioranelli M, Dowe DA. CT Evaluation of coronary Artery Disease. Springer, 2008.
44. Berthier B, Bouzerar R, Legallais C. Blood flow patterns in an anatomically realistic coronary vessel: influence of three different reconstruction methods. J Biomech. 2002;35(10):1347-1356. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00179-3.
45. Bertolotti C, Deplano V. Three-dimensional numerical simulations of flow through a stenosed coronary bypass. J Biomech. 2000;33(8):1011-1022. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00012-9.
46. Ofili EO, Kern MJ, St Vrain JA, et al. Differential characterization of blood flow, velocity, and vascular resistance between proximal and distal normal epicardial human coronary arteries: analysis by intracoronary Doppler spectral flow velocity. Am Heart J. 1995;130(1):37-46. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(95)90233-3.
47. Berne RM, levy MN. Cardiovascular physiology. Mosby, 1967; 201.
48. Brandfonbrener M, Landowne M, Shock NW. Changes in cardiac output with age. circulation. 1955;12(4):557-566. doi:10.1161/01.cIr.12.4.557.
49. Katori R. Normal cardiac output in relation to age and body size. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1979;128(4):377-387. doi:10.1620/tjem.128.377.
50. Chung WB, Hamburg NM, Holbrook M, et al. The brachial artery remodels to maintain local shear stress despite the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(4):606-612. doi:10.1161/ATVBA-HA.108.181495.
51. Reymond P, Bohraus Y, Perren F, Lazeyras F, Stergiopulos N. Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J physiol Heart circ physiol. 2011;301(3):H1173-H1182. doi:10.1152/ajp-heart.00821.2010.