The influence of surgical factors on persisting symptoms 3 years after esophageal cancer surgery: A population-based study in Sweden

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1639-1645

  Van Der Schaaf, Maartje ^a   Rutegård, Martin ^a   Lagergren, Pernilla ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER RISK; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIARRHEA; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; SWALLOWING; SWEDEN;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; APPETITE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DEGLUTITION DISORDERS; DIARRHEA; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAUSEA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; VOMITING;

EID: 84880077351     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2690-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(6):545-53.
2. Sundelof M, et al. Improved survival in both histologic types of oesophageal cancer in Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2002;99(5):751-4.
3. Djarv T, Blazeby JM, Lagergren P. Predictors of postoperative quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(12):1963-8.
4. Omloo JM, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):992-1000; discussion 1000-1.
5. Rutegard M, et al. Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2008;95(5):592-601.
6. Viklund P, et al. Quality of life and persisting symptoms after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(10):1407-14.
7. Conroy T, Marchal F, Blazeby JM. Quality of life in patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer: an overview. Oncology. 2006;70(6):391-402.
8. Lagergren P, et al. Health-related quality of life among patients cured by surgery for esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(3):686-93.
9. Viklund P, et al. Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):204-11.
10. Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365-76.
11. Blazeby JM, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(10):1384-94.
12. Djarv T, Lagergren P. Six-month postoperative quality of life predicts long-term survival after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(4):530-5.
13. Dresner SM, Griffin SM. Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87(10):1426-33.
14. Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosom Med. 1993;55(3):234-47.
15. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(11):1507-15.
16. Hulscher JB, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(21):1662-9.
17. de Boer AG, et al. Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(20):4202-8.
18. Markar SR, et al. Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(5):876-84.
19. Ercan S, et al. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(3):623-31.
20. Blackmon SH, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813.
21. Singh D, et al. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(2):419-24.
22. Parameswaran R, et al. The role of health-related quality of life outcomes in clinical decision making in surgery for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2372-9.