Reproductive interference via interspecific pairing in an amphipod species complex

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1357-1367

  Cothran, Rickey D ^a   Stiff, Andy R ^a   Chapman, Kristopher ^a   Wellborn, Gary A ^b   Relyea, Rick A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cryptic species; Hyalella; Interbreeding; Reproductive interference; Sperm storage

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPOD; COLOR; CONSPECIFIC; CRYPSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; LACUSTRINE ENVIRONMENT; PHENOTYPE; RECOGNITION; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; SPECIES COMPLEX;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMALIA; HYALELLA;

EID: 84880058029     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1564-z     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
3. Bollache L, Dick JT, Farnsworth KD, Montgomery WI (2007) Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol Lett 4: 166-169.
4. Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76: 305-339.
5. Borowsky B (1985) Responses of the amphipod crustacean Gammarus palustris to waterborne secretions of conspecifics and congenerics. J Chem Ecol 11: 1545-1552.
6. Borowsky B, Borowsky R (1987) The reproductive behaviors of the amphipod crustacean Gammarus palustris (Bousfield) and some insights into the nature of their stimuli. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 107: 131-144.
7. Bousfield EL (1996) A contribution to the reclassification of Neotropical freshwater hyalellid amphipods (Crustacea: Gammaridea, Talitroidea). Boll Mus Civ Stor Nat Verona 20: 175-224.
8. Brown WL, Wilson EO (1956) Character displacement. Syst Zool 5: 49-64.
9. Burdfield-Steel ER, Shuker DM (2011) Reproductive interference. Curr Biol 21: R450-R451.
10. Cothran RD (2004) Precopulatory mate guarding affects predation risk in two freshwater amphipod species. Anim Behav 68: 1133-1138.
11. Cothran RD (2008a) Phenotypic manipulation reveals sexual conflict over precopula duration. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 1409-1416.
12. Cothran RD (2008b) The mechanistic basis of a large male mating advantage in two freshwater amphipod species. Ethology 114: 1145-1153.
13. Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119: 601-610.
14. Dick J (2008) Role of behaviour in biological invasions and species distributions; lessons from interactions between the invasive Gammarus pulex and the native G. duebeni (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Contrib Zool 77: 91-98.
15. Edward DA, Chapman T (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 647-654.
16. Edwards T, Cowell B (1992) Population-dynamics and secondary production of Hyalella azteca (Amphipoda) in Typha stands of a subtropical Florida lake. J North Am Benthol Soc 11: 69-79.
17. Gasparini C, Devigili A, Pilastro A (2012) Cross-generational effects of sexual harassment on female fitness in the guppy. Evolution 66: 532-543.
18. Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83: 257-282.
19. Hardege JD, Terschak JA (2011) Identification of crustacean sex pheromones. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 373-392.
20. Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76: 633-642.
21. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6: 65-70.
22. Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7: 107-112.
23. Jormalainen V (1998) Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Q Rev Biol 73: 275-304.
24. Jormalainen V, Merilaita S (1993) Female resistance and precopulatory guarding in the isopod Idotea baltica (Pallas). Behaviour 125: 219-231.
25. Jormalainen V, Merilaita S (1995) Female resistance and duration of mate-guarding in three aquatic peracarids (Crustacea). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 43-48.
26. Kestrup ÅM, Dick JTA, Ricciardi A (2011) Interactions between invasive and native crustaceans: differential functional responses of intraguild predators towards juvenile heterospecifics. Biol Invasions 13: 731-737.
27. Kolding S (1986) Interspecific competition for mates and habitat selection in five species of Gammarus (Amphipoda: Crustacea). Mar Biol 91: 491-495.
28. Kolding S, Fenchel TM (1979) Coexistence and life cycle characteristics of five species of the amphipod genus Gammarus. Oikos 33: 323-327.
29. MacNeil C, Dick J, Hatcher M, Terry R, Smith J, Dunn A (2003) Parasite-mediated predation between native and invasive amphipods. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270: 1309.
30. Magurran A, Seghers B (1994) Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology-evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 255: 31-36.
31. McLain DK, Shure DJ (1987) Pseudocompetition: interspecific displacement of insect species through misdirected courtship. Oikos 49: 291-296.
32. McLain D, Pratt A (1999) The cost of sexual coercion and heterospecific sexual harassment on the fecundity of a host-specific, seed-eating insect (Neacoryphus bicrucis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46: 164-170.
33. Mead F, Gabouriaut D (1977) Chevauchee nuptiale et accouplement chez l'isopode terrestre Helleria brevicornis Ebner (Tylidae). Analyse des facteurs qui controlent ces deux phases du comportement sexuel Behaviour 63: 3-4.
34. Parker G (1974) Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. J Theor Biol 47: 223-243.
35. Pfennig K (1998) The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 265: 1743-1748.
36. Pfenninger M, Schwenk K (2007) Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol 7: 121.
37. Ridley M (1983) The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Clarendon, Oxford.
38. Rossi BH, Nonacs P, Pitts-Singer TL (2010) Sexual harassment by males reduces female fecundity in the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata. Anim Behav 79: 165-171.
39. Sakurai G, Kasuya E (2008) The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim Behav 75: 1367-1373.
40. Shuster S (1981) Sexual selection in the socorro isopod, Thermosphaeroma thermophilum (Cole) (Crustacea: Peracarida). Anim Behav 29: 698-707.
41. Siepielski AM, McPeek MA (2010) On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91: 3153-3164.
42. Sparkes T, Keogh D, Haskins K (2000) Female resistance and male preference in a stream-dwelling isopod: effects of female molt characteristics. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47: 145-155.
43. Strong DR Jr (1972) Life history variation among populations of an amphipod (Hyalella azteca). Ecology 53: 1103-1111.
44. Strong DR Jr (1973) Amphipod amplexus, the significance of ecotypic variation. Ecology 54: 1383-1388.
45. Sutcliffe DW (1992) Reproduction in Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda): basic processes. Freshw Forum 2: 102-129.
46. Thiel M (2011) Chemical communication in peracarid crustaceans. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 199-218.
47. Thompson DJ, Manning JT (1981) Mate selection by Asellus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Behaviour 78: 178-187.
48. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
49. Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and descent of man 1871-1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136-179.
50. Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 313-320.
51. Wellborn GA (1995) Determinants of reproductive success in freshwater amphipod species that experience different mortality regimes. Anim Behav 50: 353-363.
52. Wellborn GA, Cothran RD (2004) Phenotypic similarity and differentiation among sympatric cryptic species in a freshwater amphipod species complex. Freshw Biol 49: 1-13.
53. Wellborn GA, Bartholf SE (2005) Ecological context and the importance of body and gnathopod size for pairing success in two amphipod ecomorphs. Oecologia 143: 308-316.
54. Wellborn GA, Cothran RD (2007a) Niche diversity in crustacean cryptic species: complementarity in spatial distribution and predation risk. Oecologia 154: 175-183.
55. Wellborn GA, Cothran RD (2007b) Ecology and evolution of mating behavior in freshwater amphipods. In: Thiel M, Duffy EJ (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147-167.
56. Wellborn GA, Broughton RE (2008) Diversification on an ecologically constrained adaptive landscape. Mol Ecol 17: 2927-2936.
57. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
58. Wirtz P (1999) Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim Behav 58: 1-12.
59. Witt JDS, Hebert PDN (2000) Cryptic species diversity and evolution in the amphipod genus Hyalella within central glaciated North America: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57: 687-698.
60. Witt JDS, Threloff DL, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation. Mol Ecol 15: 3073-3082.
61. Yamamura N, Jormalainen V (1996) Compromised strategy resolves intersexual conflict over pre-copulatory guarding duration. Evol Ecol 10: 661-680.