Selection of Socially Responsible Portfolios Using Hedonic Prices

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 515-529

  Bilbao Terol, Amelia ^a   Arenas Parra, Mar ^a   Cañal Fernández, Verónica ^a   Bilbao Terol, Celia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Certainty equivalent; Conditional value at risk; Hedonic prices; Multi objective programming; Mutual funds; Portfolio selection; Socially responsible investment; Variance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880051367     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1411-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arenas, M., Bilbao, A., & Rodríguez, M. V. (2001). A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), 287-297.
2. Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1996). Portfolio selection: A compromise programming solution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(11), 1377-1386.
3. Barnett, M., & Salomon, R. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1101-1122.
4. Barracchini, C. (2007). An ethical investments evaluation for portfolio selection. Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 9, 1239-2685.
5. Barrachini, C. (2004). An ethical investments evaluation for portfolio selection. Electronic Journal of Business, Ethics and Organization Studies, 9(1). Accessed June 20, 2009, from http://ejbo. jyu. fi.
6. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1998). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. Basel: Basel Committee Publications.
7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1999). A new capital adequacy framework. Basel: Basel Committee Publications.
8. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2001). The new base capital accord. Basel: Basel Committee Publications.
9. Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2003). Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: A DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 521-531.
10. Bilbao, A., Arenas, M., & Cañal, V. (2012). Selection of socially responsible portfolios using goal programming and fuzzy technology. Information Sciences, 189, 110-125.
11. Bilbao, C., & Cañal, V. (2011). 'Valoración del Mercado de los Activos Éticos en España: una Aplicación del Método de los Precios Hedónicos. FUNCAS, Documento de trabajo no. 623. Accessed October 20, 2011, from http://www. funcas. es/publicaciones/Sumario. aspx?IdRef=7-05623.
12. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
13. Carroll, A. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: A historical perspective. In M. J. Epstein & K. O. Hanson (Eds.), The accountable corporation (Vol. 3). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Collison, D. J., Cobb, G., Power, D. M., & Stevenson, L. A. (2008). The financial performance of the FTSE4 good Indices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 14-28.
15. Cullis, J. G., Lewis, A., & Winnett, A. (1992). Paying to be good? U. K. Ethical investments. Kyklos, 45(1), 3-24.
16. Drut, B. (2009). Nice guys with cold feet: The cost of responsible investing in the bondmarkets. Working Paper 09-34, Centre Emile Bernheim, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
17. Drut, B. (2010). Social responsibility and mean-variance portfolio selection, Centre Emile Bernheim (CEB). Working Paper 10-002. RS, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Solvay Bruxelles School of Economics and Management.
18. European Commission. (2001). Accessed June 20, 2009, from http://ec. europa. eu/enterprise/newsroom/cf/itemdetail. cfm?item_id=3908&lang=es.
19. Farmen, T., & van Der Wijst, N. (2005). A cautionary note on the pricing of ethics. Journal of Investing, 14(3), 53-56.
20. Glac, K. (2009). Understanding socially responsible investing: The effect of decision frames and trade-off options. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 41-55.
21. Hallerbach, W., Ning, H., Soppe, A., & Spronk, J. (2004). A framework for managing a portfolio of socially responsible investments. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 517-529.
22. Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M. (1979). Multiple objectives decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
23. Ignizio, J. P. (1982). Linear programming in single and multiple objective systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Jansson, M., & Beil, A. (2009). Psychological influences on investors intention to be socially responsible investors: A comparison what influences SRI intentions among different types of investors. Sustainable Investment and Corporate Governance. Working Paper 2009/6, Sustainable Investment Research Platform.
25. Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59-67.
26. Kaminski, B., Czupryna, M., & Szapiro, T. (2009). On conditional value-at-risk based goal programming portfolio selection procedure. In V. Barichard, M. Ehrgott, X. Gandibleux, & V. T'Kindt (Eds.), Multiobjective programming and goal programming (pp. 243-252). Berlin: Springer.
27. Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2008). SRI funds: Nomen est Omen. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 35(9), 1276-1294.
28. Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4(2), 43-68.
29. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178.
30. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 7(2), 132-157.
31. Lancaster, K. J. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
32. Lancaster, K. J. (1979). Variety, equity and efficiency. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Lee, S. M., & Chesser, D. L. (1980). Goal programming for portfolio selection. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 6(3), 22-26.
34. Lee, S. M., & Lerro, A. J. (1973). Optimizing the portfolio selection for mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 28(5), 1087-1101.
35. Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2000a). Morals, money, ethical investing and economic psychology. Human Relations, 53(2), 179-191.
36. Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2000b). Support for investor activism among U. K. ethical investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 215-222.
37. Mackenzie, C., & Lewis, A. (1999). Morals and markets: The case of ethical investing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(3), 439-452.
38. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
39. Meucci, A. (2007). Risk and asset allocation. New York: Springer Quantitative Finance.
40. Miller, A. (1991). Socially responsible investment. Business Economist, 23(1), 21-33.
41. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21-41.
42. Romero, C. (1985). Multi-objective and goal programming approaches as a distance function model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(3), 249-251.
43. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.
44. Rosen, B. N., Sandler, D. M., & Shani, D. (1991). Social issues and socially responsible investment behavior: A preliminary empirical investigation. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 25(3), 221-234.
45. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143-156.
46. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K. (1998). The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 24, 119-133.
47. Scholtens, B. (2009). Measuring sustainability performance of investments; the case of Dutchbond funds. Paperprepared for the PRI Academic Conference 2009. Accessed April 16, 2010, from http://www. unpri. org/files/Scholtens_PRI2009. pdf.
48. Social Investment Forum. (2006). Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Social Investment Forum.
49. Tsai, W.-H., Chou, W.-C., & Hsu, W. (2009). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: An effective MCDM model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 1396-1410.
50. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Webley, P., Lewis, A., & Mackenzie, C. (2001). Commitment among ethical investors: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 27-42.
52. Wood, D. J., & Jones, E. J. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267.
53. Zeleny, M. (1974). Linear multiobjective programming. Berlin: Springer.