US nulliparas' perceptions of roles and of the birth experience as predictors of their delivery preferences

Midwifery

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 885-894

  Arcia, Adriana ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Home delivery; Midwifery; Patient preference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; MIDWIFE; PARITY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

CAESAREAN SECTION; HOME DELIVERY; MIDWIFERY; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MIDWIFERY; PARITY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880037693     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Planned home birth. Committee opinion no. 476. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011, 117:425-428.
2. Angeja A.C.E., Washington A.E., Vargas J.E., Gomez R., Rojas I., Caughey A.B. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006, 113:1253-1258.
3. Betrán A.P., Merialdi M., Lauer J.A., et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2007, 21:98-113.
4. Birthplace in England Collaborative Group Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 2011, 343:d7400.
5. Boucher D., Bennet C., McFarlin B., Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 2009, 54:119-126.
6. Bracken J.N., Dryfhout V.L., Goldenhar L.M., Pauls R.N. Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey. International Urogynecology Journal 2008, 19:1527-1531.
7. Buyukbayrak E.E., Kaymaz O., Kars B., et al. Caesarean delivery or vaginal birth: preference of Turkish pregnant women and influencing factors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2010, 30:155-158.
8. Bylund C. Mothers' involvement in decision making during the birth process: a quantitative analysis of women's online birth stories. Health Communication 2005, 18:23-39.
9. Callister L. Beliefs and perceptions of childbearing women choosing different primary health care providers. Clinical Nursing Research 1995, 4:168-180.
10. Cheyney M.J. Homebirth as systems-challenging praxis: knowledge, power, and intimacy in the birthplace. Qualitative Health Research 2008, 18:254-267.
11. Chute G.E. Expectation and experience in alternative and conventional birth. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 1985, 14:61-67.
12. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159.
13. Cragin L., Kennedy H.P. Linking obstetric and midwifery practice with optimal outcomes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 2006, 35:779-785.
14. Davis L.G., Riedmann G.L., Sapiro M., Minogue J.P., Kazer R.R. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 1994, 39:91-97.
15. de Jonge A., van der Goes B.Y., Ravelli A.C.J., et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009, 116:1177-1184.
16. Deneux-Tharaux C., Carmona E., Bouvier-Colle M.-H., Breart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006, 108:541-548.
17. Foster, J., 1981. Utah Test for the Childbearing Year: Beliefs and Perceptions About Childbearing. Doctoral dissertation. University of Utah, unpublished. http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/undthes&CISOPTR=4381.
18. Fuglenes D., Aas E., Botten G., Øian P., Kristiansen I.S. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean?: the influence of parity, delivery experiences and fear. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011, 25:45.e1-45.e9.
19. Galotti K.M., Pierce B., Reimer R.L., Luckner A.E. Midwife or doctor: a study of pregnant women making delivery decisions. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 2000, 45:320-329.
20. Hall W.A., Hauck Y.L., Carty E.M., Hutton E.K., Fenwick J., Stoll K. delivery fear, anxiety, fatigue, and sleep deprivation in pregnant women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 2009, 38:567-576.
21. Hansen A.K., Wisborg K., Uldbjerg N., Henriksen T.B. Elective caesarean section and respiratory morbidity in the term and near-term neonate. Acta Obstetricia et Gyenecologica 2007, 86:389-394.
22. Harper M.A., Byington R.P., Espeland M.A., Naughton M., Meyer R., Lane K. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003, 102:273-278.
23. Heinze S.D., Sleigh M.J. Epidural or no epidural anaesthesia: relationships between beliefs about delivery and pain control choices. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2003, 21:323-333.
24. Hutton E.K., Reitsma A.H., Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth 2009, 36:180-189.
25. Janssen P.A., Henderson A.D., Vedam S. The experience of planned home birth: views of the first 500 women. Birth 2009, 36:297-304.
26. Janssen P.A., Saxell L., Page L.A., Klein M.C., Liston R.M., Lee S.K. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2009, 181:377-383.
27. Jimenez V., Klein M.C., Hivon M., Mason C. A mirage of change: family-centered maternity care in practice. Birth 2010, 37:160-167.
28. Johnson K.C., Daviss B.-A. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. British Medical Journal 2005, 330:1416-1422.
29. Kline R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 2005, The Guilford Press, New York. 2nd edn.
30. Laubereau B., Filipiak-Pittroff B., von Berg A., et al. Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004, 89:993-997.
31. Liu S., Liston R.M., Joseph K.S., Heaman M., Sauve R., Kramer M.S. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2007, 176:455-460.
32. Lydon-Rochelle M. Cesarean delivery rates in women cared for by certified nurse-midwives in the United States: a review. Birth 1995, 22:211-219.
33. MacDorman M.F., Declercq E., Menacker F., Malloy M.H. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model. Birth 2008, 35:3-8.
34. MacDorman, M.F., Mathews, T.J., Declercq, E., 2012. Home births in the United States, 1990-2009. NCHS Data Brief, no. 84. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
35. MacDorman, M., Menacker, F., Declercq, E., 2010. Trends and Characteristics of Home and Other Out-of-Hospital Births in the United States, 1990-2006. National Vital Statistics Reports, no. 58. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyatsville, MD.
36. Martin, J.A., Hamilton, B.E., Ventura, S.J., Osterman, M.J.K., Wilson, E.C., Mathews, T.J., 2012. Births: Final Data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports, no. 61. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyatsville, MD.
37. Midwives Alliance of North America, 2008. Certified professional midwives in the United States. http://mana.org/pdfs/CPMIssueBrief.pdf.
38. Melender H.-L. Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and delivery: a study of 329 pregnant women. Birth 2002, 29:101-111.
39. Muthén, L.K.,Muthén, B.O. (Eds.), 1998-2007. Mplus User's Guide, 5th edn. Muthén and Muthén, LosAngeles, CA.
40. Nieminen K., Stephansson O., Ryding E.L. Women's fear of delivery and preference for cesarean section-a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstericia et Gynecologica 2009, 88:807-813.
41. Ng M., Sinclair M. Women's experience of planned home birth: a phenomenological study. RCM Midwives Journal 2002, 5:56-59.
42. Parry D.C. "We wanted a birth experience, not a medical experience": exploring Canadian women's use of midwifery. Health Care for Women International 2008, 29:784-806.
43. Pazol K., Zane S.B., Parker W.Y., Hall L.R., Berg C., Cook D.A. Abortion surveillance-United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2011, 60:1-41.
44. Pérez-Ríos N., Ramos-Valencia G., Ortiz A.P. Cesarean delivery as a barrier for breastfeeding initiation: the Puerto Rican experience. Journal of Human Lactation 2008, 24:293-302.
45. Poore M., Foster J.C. Epidural and no epidural anesthesia: differences between mothers and their experience of birth. Birth 1985, 12:205-212.
46. Possamai-Inesedy A. Confining risk: choice and responsibility in delivery in a risk society. Health Sociology Review 2006, 15:406-414.
47. Queenan J.T. How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011, 118:199-200.
48. Raykov T. Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement 1997, 21:173-184.
49. Roberts K., Vitonis A. Access to certified nurse-midwives reduces cesarean section rates among Massachusetts hospitals. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 2008, 53:481.
50. Rosenblatt R.A., Dobie S.A., Hart L.G., et al. Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women. American Journal of Public Health 1997, 87:344-351.
51. Rowe-Murray H.J., Fisher J.R.W. Operative intervention in delivery is associated with compromised early mother-infant interaction. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001, 108:1068-1075.
52. Rowe-Murray H.J., Fisher J.R.W. Baby friendly hospital practices: cesarean section is a persistent barrier to early initiation of breastfeeding. Birth 2002, 29:124-131.
53. Sakala C. Midwifery care and out-of-hospital birth settings: how do they reduce unnecessary cesarean section births?. Social Science and Medicine 1993, 37:1233-1250.
54. Sakala C., Corry M.P. Evidence-Based Maternity Care: What it is and What it can Achieve 2008, Milbank Memorial Fund, New York. http://www.milbank.org/reports/0809MaternityCare/0809/MaternityCare.htm.
55. Stoll K., Fairbrother N., Carty E., et al. "It's all the rage these days": university students' attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean birth. Birth 2009, 36:133-140.
56. Symon A.G., Paul J., Butchart M., Carr V., Dugard P. Self-rated "no-" and "low-" risk pregnancy: a comparison of outcomes for women in obstetric-led and midwife-led units in England. Birth 2007, 34:323-330.
57. Thurman A.R., Zoller J.S., Swift.S.E. Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route. International Urogynecology Journal 2004, 15:308-312.
58. Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self-constructed choice in Finland. Social Science and Medicine 2001, 52:1109-1121.
59. World Health Organization Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care: A Handbook 2009, WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547734_eng.pdf.
60. Zanardo V., Svegliado G., Cavallin F., et al. Elective cesarean delivery: does it have a negative effect on breastfeeding?. Birth 2010, 37:275-279.
61. Zickuhr, K., Smith, A., 2012. Digital Differences. Pew Research Center. http://pewinternet.org//media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Digital_differences_041312.pdf.