Messy hectares: Questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data

Journal of Peasant Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 485-501

  Edelman, Marc ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Africa; farm ownership; foreign investment; land grabbing; land tenure; large scale land acquisitions; Latin America

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879997399     PISSN: 03066150     EISSN: 17439361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2013.801340     Document Type: Note

References (65)

1. Aguilar-Robledo, M. 2009. Contested terrain: the rise and decline of surveying in New Spain, 1500-1800. Journal of Latin American Geography, 8(2), 23-47. doi: 10.1353/lag.0.0058
2. Anseeuw, W., M. Boche, T. Breu, M. Giger, J. Lay, P. Messerli and K. Nolte. 2012. Transnational land deals for agriculture in the global south. Analytical report based on the Land Matrix Database [online]. CDE/CIRAD/GIGA. Available from: http://landportal.info/landmatrix/media/img/analytical-report.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2012].
3. Anseeuw, W., L. Cotula and M. Taylor. 2012. Expectations and implications of the rush for land: understanding the opportunities and risks at stake in Africa. In: T. Allan, M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo and J. Warner, eds. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: foreign direct investment and food and water security. London: Routledge, pp. 421-435.
4. Anseeuw, W., L.A. Wily, L. Cotula and M. Taylor. 2012. Land rights and the rush for land: findings of the Global Commercial Pressures on Land Research Project [online]. International Land Coalition. Available from: http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/publication/1205/ILC%20GSR%20report_ENG.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2012].
5. Barrett, W. 1979. Jugerum and caballería in New Spain. Agricultural History, 53(2), 423-437.
6. Borras, S.M., J.C. Franco, S. Gómez, C. Kay and M. Spoor. 2012. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3-4), 845-872. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.679931
7. Borras, S.M., C. Kay, S. Gómez, and J. Wilkinson. 2012. Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'études Du Développement, 33(4), 402-416. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2012.745394
8. Bräutigam, D. 2013. Chinese engagement in African agriculture: fiction and fact. In: T. Allan, M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo and J. Warner, eds. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: foreign direct investment and food and water security. New York: Routledge, pp. 91-103.
9. Brenner, P. 2012. The Land Matrix: much ado about nothing [online]. Farmlandgrab.org. Available from: http://farmlandgrab.org/post/view/20405 [Accessed 12 February 2013].
10. Brito, B. and P. Barreto. 2011. Did land regularization advance in the Amazon? Two years of the legal land program. Executive summary [online]. Imazon. Available from: http://www.imazon.org.br/publications/books/did-land-regularization-advance-in-the-amazon-two-years-of-the-legal-land-program-executive-summary-en/at_download/file [Accessed 25 March 2012].
11. Chapin, M. 1995. Examen de libros. Mesoamérica, 16(29), 233-247.
12. Chichava, S., J. Duran, L. Cabral, A. Shankland, L. Buckley, L. Tang and Y. Zhang. 2013. Chinese and Brazilian cooperation with African agriculture: the case of Mozambique [online]. Future Agricultures Working Paper 049. Available from: http://www.future-agricultures.org/publications/research-and-analysis/working-papers/doc_download/1637-chinese-and-brazilian-cooperation-with-african-agriculture-the-case-of-mozambique [Accessed 10 March 2013].
13. Collier, G. 1975. Are marginal farmlands marginal to their farmers? In: S. Platter, ed. Formal models in economic anthropology. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, pp. 149-158.
14. Collin, M. 2013. Governance, land grabs and tricky statistics. February 14, 2013. Aid thoughts: digesting the difficult decisions of development [online]. Available from: http://aidthoughts.org/?p=3645 [Accessed 14 February 2013].
15. Cotula, L. 2012. The international political economy of the global land rush: a critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 649-680. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.674940
16. Daniel, S. and A. Mittal. 2009. The great land grab: rush for world's farmland threatens food security for the poor [online]. The Oakland Institute. Available from: http://www.oaklandinstitute.org/sites/oaklandinstitute.org/files/LandGrab_final_web.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2010].
17. Deininger, K.W. and D. Byerlee. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? [online]. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTARD/Resources/ESW_Sept7_final_final.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2012].
18. Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359.
19. De Schutter, O. 2011. How not to think of land-grabbing: three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 249-279. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559008
20. de Soto, H. 1989. The other path: the economic answer to terrorism. New York: Basic Books.
21. Economist. 2011. The surge in land deals: when others are grabbing their land [online]. The Economist, 5 May. Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/18648855 [Accessed 12 February 2013].
22. Edelman, M. 1980. Agricultural modernization in smallholding areas of Mexico: a case study in the Sierra Norte de Puebla. Latin American Perspectives, 7(4), 29-49. doi: 10.1177/0094582X8000700403
23. Edelman, M. 1992. The logic of the latifundio: the large estates of northwestern Costa Rica since the late nineteenth century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Edelman, M. and M.A. Seligson. 1994. Land inequality: a comparison of census data and property records in twentieth-century southern Costa Rica. Hispanic American Historical Review, 74(3), 445-491. doi: 10.2307/2517892
25. Gaitán Lara, D. 2010. Conflictos de tierras comunales en Santa Cruz Chiquimulilla, Santa Rosa durante el régimen colonial. Estudios - Revista de Antropología, Arqueología e Historia. Anuario de la Escuela de Historia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, 187-205.
26. Geary, K. 2012. 'Our land, our lives': time out on the global land rush [online]. Oxfam International. Available from: http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bn-land-lives-freeze-041012-en_1.pdf [Accessed 30 October 2012].
27. Gitelman, L. and V. Jackson. 2013. Introduction. In: L. Gitelman, ed. 'Raw data' is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1-14.
28. Gómez, S. 2011. Acaparamiento de tierras. reflexiones sobre la dinámica reciente del mercado de la tierra en América Latina [online]. Food and Agriculture Organization. Available from: http://www.rlc.fao.org/fileadmin/content/events/semtierras/estudios/gomez.pdf [Accessed 2 January 2013].
29. Gordillo, G. 2004. Landscapes of devils: tensions of place and memory in the Argentinean Chaco. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. GRAIN. 2008. Seized: the 2008 landgrab for food and financial security [online]. Available from: http://www.grain.org/briefings_files/landgrab-2008-en.pdf [Accessed 30 November 2008].
31. GRAIN. 2012. Interview with GRAIN on the ProSavana Project [online]. Available from: http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4633-interview-with-grain-on-the-prosavana-project [Accessed 30 December 2012].
32. Hall, D. 2012. Land. Oxford: Polity Press.
33. Harper, R. 2000. The social organization of the IMF's mission work: an examination of international auditing. In: M. Strathern, ed. Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge, pp. 21-53.
34. Hetherington, K. 2012. Promising information: democracy, development, and the remapping of Latin America. Economy and Society, 41(2), 127-150. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.607365
35. Holt-Giménez, E. 2012. Land grabs versus land sovereignty. Food First Backgrounder, 18(4), 1-3.
36. ILC [International Land Coalition]. 2012. Commercial pressures on land [online]. Available from: http://www.commercialpressuresonland.org/land-matrix [Accessed 10 November 2012].
37. Jerven, M. 2013. Poor numbers: how we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
38. Kipling, R. 1907. From sea to sea: letters of travel. Vol. 2. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
39. Kugelman, M. 2012. Introduction. In: M. Kugelman and S.L. Levenstein, eds. Global farms race: land grabs, agricultural investment, and the scramble for food security. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 1-20.
40. Kugelman, M. 2013. The global farmland rush. The New York Times, 6 February, p. A25.
41. Kula, W. 1986. Measures and men. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Land Matrix. 2012. Land Matrix [online]. Available from: http://landportal.info/landmatrix [Accessed 10 November 2012].
43. Marston, S.A. 2000. The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219-242. doi: 10.1191/030913200674086272
44. Mehta, L., G.J. Veldwisch and J. Franco. 2012. Introduction to the special issue: water grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 193-207.
45. O Pais. 2012. Pro-Savana não vai confiscar terras de camponeses [online]. O Pais, 27 December. Available from: http://www.opais.co.mz/index.php/sociedade/45-sociedade/23527-pro-savana-nao-vai-confiscar-terras-de-camponeses.html [Accessed 20 February 2013].
46. Ots Capdequí, J.M. 1959. España en América: el régimen de tierras en la época colonial. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
47. Oxfam GB. 2011. Land and power: the growing scandal surrounding the new wave of investments in land [online]. Oxfam Briefing Paper 151. Available from
48. Oya, C. 2013. Facts, methods and assumptions on land grabs: a methodological reflection on land databases and the land grab literature 'rush'. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 501-518.
49. Pearce, F. 2012. The land grabbers: the new fight over who owns the earth. Boston: Beacon Press.
50. Pearce, F. 2013. Splash and grab: the global scramble for water [online]. New Scientist, no. 2906 (4 March). Available from: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21729066.400-splash-and-grab-the-global-scramble-for-water.html [Accessed 8 March 2013].
51. Rice, A. 2009. Is there such a thing as agro-imperialism? [online]. The New York Times Magazine, 22 November. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/magazine/22land-t.html?pagewanted=all [Accessed 23 November 2009].
52. Rulli, M.C., A. Saviori and P. D'Odorico. 2013. Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 892-897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213163110
53. Schrank, A. 2006a. Case-based research. In: E. Perecman and S.R. Curran, eds. A handbook for social science field research: essays and bibliographic sources on research design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 21-45.
54. Schrank, A. 2006b. Essentials for the case study method. In: E. Perecman and S.R. Curran, eds. A handbook for social science field research: essays and bibliographic sources on research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 163-174.
55. Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. Taleb, N.N. 2012. Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House.
57. UNAC. 2012. Land grabbing for agribusiness in Mozambique: UNAC statement on the ProSavana Programme [online]. União Nacional de Camponeses Moçambique. Available from: http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/agrarian-reform-mainmenu-36/1321-land-grabbing-for-agribusiness-on-mozambique-unac-statement-on-the-prosavana-programme [Accessed 20 November 2012].
58. Verdery, K. 2003. The vanishing hectare: property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59. von Braun, J. and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2009. 'Land grabbing' by foreign investors in developing countries: risks and opportunities. IFPRI Policy Brief, 13(April), 1-9.
60. Warman, A. 2003. Corn & capitalism: how a botanical bastard grew to global dominance. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
61. White, B., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones and W. Wolford. 2012. The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 619-647. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.691879
62. Wily, L.A. 2012a. Enclosure revisited: putting the global land rush in historical perspective. In: T. Allan, M. Keulertz, S. Sojamo and J. Warner, eds. Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: foreign direct investment and food and water security. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 11-23.
63. Wily, L.A. 2012b. The global land rush: what this means for customary land rights [online]. Rights and resources. Available from: http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/quarantined/files/turningpoint/RightsToResourcesInCrisis.Briefs1thru5.pdf [Accessed 13 February 2013].
64. World Bank. 2007. World development report 2008: agriculture for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
65. Yang, H.-P. 1955. Fact-finding with rural people. Rome: FAO.