Efficient photochemical hydrogen production under visible-light over artificial photosynthetic systems

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 38, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 8639-8647

  Chen, Jianjun ^a   Su, Huilan ^a   Liu, Yujia ^a   Zeng, Yiwei ^a   Zhang, Wang ^a   Gu, Jiajun ^a   Lau, Woon Ming ^b,c   Zhang, Di ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Chengdu Green Energy and Green Manufacturing Technology R and D Center   (China)

^c BEIJING COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

Artificial photosynthetic systems; CdS Pt TiO2; Hydrogen production; Reticular hierarchical structure

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL PHOTOSYNTHETIC SYSTEMS; CDS; CHEMICAL BATH DEPOSITION METHODS; FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS; FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; PHOTOSYNTHESIS PROCESS; VISIBLE WAVELENGTHS;

CADMIUM SULFIDE; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

EID: 84879949898     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.045     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. (a)Fujishima A, Honda K. Photolysis-decomposition of water at the surface of an irradiated semiconductor. Nature 1972;238:37-8
2. 2 nanotube-array photoelectrodes. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130:1124-5.
3. 2 catalyst. Water Res 2004;38:3001-8.
4. 2: correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics. J Phys Chem 1994;98:13669-79.
5. (a)Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001;293:269-71
6. 2. Science 2002;297:2243-5.
7. 2 under visible light using Acid Red 44. J Catal Today 2003;87:77-86.
8. 2 composite systems and its role in photocatalytic dgradation of a textile azo dye. Chem Mater 1996;8:2180-7
9. 2 electrodes with InP quantum dots. Langmuir 1998;14:3153-6.
10. Zhang N, Zhang Y, Xu YJ. Recent progress on graphene-based photocatalysts: current status and future perspectives. Nanoscale 2012;4:5792-813.
11. 2 nanotubes synthesis and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 2011;50:2904-39.
12. 2 hollow spheres and their photocatalytic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012;4:860-5.
13. Yu JG, Su YR, Cheng B. Template-free fabrication and enhanced photocatalytic activity of hierarchical macro-/mesoporous titania. Adv Funct Mater 2007;17:1984-90.
14. Zhang N, Liu S, Xu YJ. Recent progress on metal core@semiconductor shell nanocomposites as a promising type of photocatalyst. Nanoscale 2012;4:2227-38.
15. Shimoni E, Rav-Hon O, Ohad I, Brumfeld V, Reich Z. Three-dimensional organization of higher-plant chloroplast thylakoid membranes revealed by electron tomograph. Plant Cell 2005;17:2580-6.
16. Gust D, Moore TA, Moore AL. Mimicking photosynthetic solar energy transduction. Acc Chem Res 2001;34:40-8.
17. 2 from green-leaf biotemplates. Adv Funct Mater 2009;19:45-56.
18. Vukusic P, Sambles JR, Lawrence CR. Structurally assisted blackness in butterfly scales. Proc R Soc London B 2004;271:S237-9.
19. Liu H, Zhao Q, Zhou H, Ding J, Zhang D, Fan T. Hydrogen evolution via sunlight water splitting on an artificial butterfly wing architecture. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011;13:10872-6.
20. 2 nanotube array films sensitized with CdS as highly active solar light-driven photocatalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 2009;93:119-25.
21. 2. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:7079-85.
22. 2 nanotubes and CdS nanoparticles. Chem Commun 2006;48:5024-6.
23. 2 nanotubes with CdS. Chem Mater 2008;20:6784-91.
24. 2 photocatalyst derived from butterfly wing (Papilio Paris). J Colloid Interface Sci 2012;370:117-23.
25. 2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets. J Phys Chem C 2010;114:13118-25.
26. Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD, Chastain J. Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Eden Prairie, MN: Physical Electronics, Inc; 1992.
27. http://srdata.nist.gov/xps/Default.aspx [accessed June 2010].
28. Dodson C, Spicer J, Fitch M, Schuster P, Osiander R. Propagation of terahertz radiation in porous polymer and ceramic materials. AIP Conf Proc 2005;760:562-9.
29. 2 micro/nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Opt Express 2012;20:A340-50.
30. Liu J,Liu G, Li M, Shen W,Wang J, Jiang L, et al. Enhancement of photochemical hydrogen evolutionover Pt-loadedhierarchical titania photonic crystal. Energy Environ Sci 2010;3:1503-6.
31. (a)Luo HM, Wang C, Yan YS. Synthesis of mesostructured titania with controlled crystalline framework. Chem Mater 2003;15:3841-6
32. (b)Yan MC, Chen F, Zhang JL, Anpo M. Preparation of controllable crystalline titania and study on the photocatalytic properties. J Phys Chem B 2005;109:8673-8.
33. Yu JG, Tao HZ, Cheng B. In situ monitoring of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. ChemPhysChem 2010;11:1617-8.
34. 2 anatase thin films. J Appl Phys 1994;75:2042-7.
35. 2/Pt hybrid photocatalysts on visible light-induced hydrogen production. J Mater Chem 2008;18:2379-85.
36. Chen Y, Wang L, Lu GM, Yao X, Guo L. Nanoparticles enwrapped with nanotubes: a unique architecture of CdS/titanate nanotubes for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production from water. J Mater Chem 2011;21:5134-41.
37. Shen S, Guo L. Growth of quantum-confined CdS nanoparticles inside Ti-MCM-41 as a visible light photocatalyst. Mater Res Bull 2008;43:437-46.
38. Li Q, Guo B, Yu J, Ran J, Zhang B, Yan H, et al. Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS-cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:10878-84.
39. 2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011;13:8915-23.
40. 2O4(OH)2 nanotube sensitized by CdS nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull 2009;44:442-5.
41. xS solid solution. Green Chem 2010;12:1611-4.
42. x catalyst. Energy Fuels 2009;23:2192-6.