A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 15, 2013, Pages

  Phillips, Frank M ^a   Lee, Joe Y B ^a   Geisler, Fred H ^b   Cappuccino, Andrew ^c   Chaput, Christopher D ^d   Devine, John G ^e   Reah, Christopher ^f   Gilder, Kye M ^f   Howell, Kelli M ^f   McAfee, Paul C ^g  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Institute of Chicago   (United States)

^c Buffalo Spine Surgery   (United States)

^d SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e EISENHOWER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f NuVasive Inc   (United States)

^g St Joseph Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

ACDF; arthroplasty; Cervical total disc replacement; PCM; Porous Coated Motion; randomized clinical trial

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARM PAIN; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSPHAGIA; FEMALE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NONHUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICULOPATHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE FUSION IMPLANT; SPINE MOBILITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOSIS; TIME FACTORS; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879947024     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT. Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine 1999; 24: 1604-10.
2. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, et al. Robinson ante-rior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1298-307.
3. Clements DH, O'Leary PF. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 1990; 15: 1023-5.
4. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine 1998; 23: 2047-51.
5. Goto S, Mochizuki M, Kita T, et al. Anterior surgery in four con-secutive technical phases for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1993; 18: 1968-73.
6. Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Jannetta PJ, et al. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases. J Neurosurg 1980; 53: 1-11.
7. Murphey F, Simmons JC, Brunson B. Surgical treatment of later-ally ruptured cervical disc. Review of 648 cases, 1939 to 1972. J Neurosurg 1973; 38: 679-83.
8. Traynelis VC. The Prestige cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2004; 4: 310S-4S.
9. Zdeblick TA, Bohlman HH. Cervical kyphosis and myelopathy. Treatment by anterior corpectomy and strut-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 170-82.
10. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 1958; 15: 602-17.
11. Cloward RB. Treatment of acute fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine by vertebral-body fusion. A report of eleven cases. J Neurosurg 1961; 18: 201-9.
12. Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, et al. Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with/allograft. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 229-36.
13. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 1993; 18: 2167-73.
14. Cherubino P, Benazzo F, Borromeo U, et al. Degenerative arthri-tis of the adjacent spinal joints following anterior cervical spinal fusion: clinicoradiologic and statistical correlations. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1990; 16: 533-43.
15. DePalma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, et al. Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972; 134: 755-8.
16. DiAngelo DJ, Foley KT, Vossel KA, et al. Anterior cervical plat-ing reverses load transfer through multilevel strut-grafts. Spine 2000; 25: 783-95.
17. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intra-discal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2005; 30: 1165-72.
18. Fielding JW. Normal and selected abnormal motion of the cervi-cal spine from the second cervical vertebra to the seventh cervi-cal vertebra based on cineroentgenography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964; 46: 1779-81.
19. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17: 79-85.
20. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Hochschuler SH, et al. Prospective randomized study of the CHARITE artificial disc: data from two investigational centers. Spine J 2004; 4: 252S-9S.
21. Harris RI, Wiley JJ. Acquired spondylolysis as a sequel to spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963; 45: 1159-70.
22. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 519-28.
23. Hilibrand AS, Yoo JU, Carlson GD, et al. The success of ante-rior cervical arthrodesis adjacent to a previous fusion. Spine 1997; 22: 1574-9.
24. Hunter LY, Braunstein EM, Bailey RW. Radiographic changes following anterior cervical fusion. Spine 1980; 5: 399-401.
25. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, et al. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 320-4.
26. Kulkarni V, Rajshekhar V, Raghuram L. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. J Neuro-surg 2004; 100: 2-6.
27. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on interver-tebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 1999; 24: 670-5.
28. Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke HJ, et al. Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 379-84.
29. Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, et al. Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 2004; 29: E221-E226.
30. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 417-23.
31. Shoda E, Sumi M, Kataoka O, et al. Developmental and dynamic canal stenosis as radiologic factors affecting surgical results of ante-rior cervical fusion for myelopathy. Spine 1999; 24: 1421-4.
32. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cer-vical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 17-21.
33. Zigler JE. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II. Spine J 2004; 4: 260S-7S.
34. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompres-sion and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 2009; 34: 101-7.
35. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, et al. Clinical and radio-graphic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 198-209.
36. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospec-tive, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Admin-istration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 2009; 9: 275-86.
37. Link HD, McAfee PC, Pimenta L. Choosing a cervical disc replace-ment. Spine J 2004; 4: 294S-302S.
38. Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, et al. Comparative fixation methods of cervical disc arthroplasty versus conventional methods of anterior cervical arthrodesis: serration, teeth, keels, or screws? J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 214-20.
39. Blackwelder WC. "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1982; 3: 345-53.
40. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and inter-body fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A: 607-24.
41. Phillips FM, Allen TR, Regan JJ, et al. Cervical disc replacement in patients with and without previous adjacent level fusion surgery: a prospective study. Spine 2009; 34: 556-65.
42. Yue JJ, Bertagnoli R, McAfee PC, et al. Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: Advanced Techniques and Controversies. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2008.
43. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409-15.
44. Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunc-tion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 331-8.
45. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, et al. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40-66.
46. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disk lesions. J Am Med Assoc 1958; 166: 23-8.
47. Walraevens J, Liu B, Meersschaert J, et al. Qualitative and quantita-tive assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 358-69.
48. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of het-erotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 384-9.
49. Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15: 348-58.
50. McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K, et al. A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine 2012; 37: 943-52.
51. Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantita-tive radiographic analysis. Spine 2011; 36: 721-30.
52. Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Vigna F, et al. A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: a cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 312-7.