Meta-analysis diagnostic accuracy of SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools: A case of UTG1A1 gene mutations

International Journal of Molecular Epidemiology and Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 77-85

  Galehdari, Hamid ^a   Saki, Najmaldin ^b   Mohammadi asl, Javad ^b   Rahim, Fakher ^b  

^a SHAHID CHAMRAN UNIVERSITY OF AHVAZ   (Iran)

^b AHVAZ JUNDISHAPUR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Crigler Najjar syndrome (CNS); Fathmm; Mutpred; PHD SNP; PolyPhen2; Provean; SIFT; UGT1A1 gene

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; GENE; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MISSENSE MUTATION; PATHOGENICITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; UTG1A1 GENE;

EID: 84879937055     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19481756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ng PC and Henikoff S. Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2006; 7: 61-80.
2. Lodoso Torrecilla B, Palomo Atance E, Camarena Grande C, Diaz Fernandez MC, Hierro Llanillo L, De la Vega Bueno A, Frauca Remacha E, Munoz Bartolo G and Jara Vega P. [Crigler-Najjar syndrome: diagnosis and treatment]. An Pediatr (Barc) 2006; 65: 73-78.
3. Nair KM, Lohse P and Nampoothiri S. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 2: Novel UGT1A1 mutation. Indian J Hum Genet 2012; 18: 233-234.
4. Sagili H, Pramya N, Jayalaksmi D and Rani R. Crigler-Najjar syndrome II and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 32: 188-189.
5. Aloulou H, Ben Thabet A, Khanfir S, Ben Mansour L, Chabchoub I, Labrune P, Kammoun T and Hachicha M.[Type I Crigler Najjar syndrome in Tunisia: a study of 30 cases]. Tunis Med 2010; 88: 707-709.
6. Iolascon A, Meloni A, Coppola B and Rosatelli MC. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type II resulting from three different mutations in the bilirubin uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) gene. J Med Genet 2000; 37: 712-713.
7. Shevell MI, Bernard B, Adelson JW, Doody DP, Laberge JM and Guttman FM. Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I: treatment by home phototherapy followed by orthotopic hepatic transplantation. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 429-431.
8. Shevell MI, Majnemer A and Schiff D. Neurologic perspectives of Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I. J Child Neurol 1998; 13: 265-269.
9. Ihara H, Nakamura H, Aoki Y, Aoki T and Yoshida M. In vitro effects of light on serum bilirubin subfractions measured by high-performance liquid chromatography: comparison with four routine methods. Clin Chem 1992; 38: 2124-2129.
10. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, Pilbout S and Schneider M. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 365-370.
11. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM and Sirotkin K. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: 308-311.
12. Fredman D, Munns G, Rios D, Sjoholm F, Siegfried M, Lenhard B, Lehvaslaiho H and Brookes AJ. HGVbase: a curated resource describing human DNA variation and phenotype relationships. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D516-519.
13. Capriotti E, Calabrese R and Casadio R. Predicting the insurgence of human genetic diseases associated to single point protein mutations with support vector machines and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 2729-2734.
14. Stitziel NO, Tseng YY, Pervouchine D, Goddeau D, Kasif S and Liang J. Structural location of disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms. J Mol Biol 2003; 327: 1021-1030.
15. Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GL, Edwards KJ, Day IN and Gaunt TR. Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat 2013; 34: 57-65.
16. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR and Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46688.
17. Li B, Krishnan VG, Mort ME, Xin F, Kamati KK, Cooper DN, Mooney SD and Radivojac P. Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 2744-2750.
18. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ and Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1129-1135.
19. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K and Coomarasamy A. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 31.
20. Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1237-1256.
21. Wang Z and Moult J. SNPs, protein structure, and disease. Hum Mutat 2001; 17: 263-270.