Effects of the pre-treatment alternatives on the treatment of oil-gas field produced water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1576-1583

  Ozgun, Hale ^a,b   Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ^a,b   Erdem, Selime ^a   Atay, Burcu ^a   Kose, Borte ^a   Kaya, Recep ^a   Altinbas, Mahmut ^a   Sayili, Sema ^c   Hoshan, Pelin ^c   Atay, Doga ^c   Eren, Esra ^c   Kinaci, Cumali ^a   Koyuncu, Ismail ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c TURKISH PETROLEUM CORPORATION   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Membrane bioreactor; Nanofiltration; Pre treatment; Produced water; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL METHODS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE TREATMENTS; OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION; PRE-TREATMENT; PRODUCED WATER; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEMS;

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; GAS INDUSTRY; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

WATER FILTRATION;

BARIUM; BROMIDE; CADMIUM; CALCIUM; CHROMIUM; COPPER; CYANIDE; FLUORIDE; IRON; LEAD; MAGNESIUM; MERCURY; NICKEL; NITRATE; PHENOL; PHOSPHATE; POTASSIUM; SODIUM; STRONTIUM; SULFATE; SULFUR; SURFACE WATER; WATER; ZINC;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONDUCTANCE; MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; OIL AND GAS FIELD; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SALINITY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84879888609     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Stephenson MT, Components of produced water: a compilation of industry studies. J Petrol Technol 44:548-603 (1992).
2. Hansen BR and Davies SRH, Review of potential technologies for the removal of dissolved components from produced water. Chem Eng Res Des 72:176-88 (1994).
3. Tellez GT, Nirmalakhandan N and Gardea-Torresdey JL, Performance evaluation of an activated sludge system for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from oilfield produced water. Adv Environ Res 6:455-470 (2002).
4. Campos JC, Borges RMH, Oliveira Filho AM, Nobrega R and Sant'Anna GL, Oilfield wastewater treatment by combined microfiltration and biological processes. Water Res 36:95-104 (2002).
5. Cakmakci M, Kayaalp N and Koyuncu I, Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes. Desalination 222:176-186 (2008).
6. Ahmadun FR, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS and Abidin ZZ, Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Hazard Mater 170:530-551 (2009).
7. Ozgun H, Ersahin ME, Erdem S, Atay B, Sayili S, Eren E, Hoshan P, Atay D, Altinbas M, Kinaci C and Koyuncu I, Produced water: comparative evaluation of characterization for produced water generated from oil, gas and oil-gas production fields. Clean-Soil Air Water, DOI: 10.1002/clen.201200204.
8. Neff JM, Sour TC and Maciolek N Fate and effects of produced water discharges in nearshore marine waters. American Petroleum Institute Publication No. 4472, Washington, DC (1989).
9. Mondal S and Wickramasinghe SR, Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J Membrane Sci 322:162-170 (2008).
10. Mueller J, Cen Y and Davis RH, Crossflow microfiltration of oily water. J. Membrane Sci 129:221-235 (1997).
11. Murray-Gulde C, Heatley JE, Karanfil T, Rodgers JH and Myers JE, Performance of a hybrid reverse osmosis-constructed wetland treatment system for brackish oil field produced water. Water Res 37:705-713 (2003).
12. Qiao X, Zhang Z, Yu J and Ye X, Performance characteristics of a hybrid membrane pilot-scale plant for oilfield-produced wastewater. Desalination 225:113-122 (2008).
13. Ebrahimi M, Willershausen D, Ashaghi KS, Engel L, Placido L, Mund P, Bolduan P and Czermak P, Investigations on the use of different ceramic membranes for efficient oil-field produced water treatment. Desalination 250:991-996 (2010).
14. Xu P and Drewes JE, Viability of nanofiltration and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for multi-beneficial use of methane produced water. Sep Purif Technol 52:67-76 (2006).
15. Kwon S, Sullivan EJ, Katz L, Kinney K, Bowman R, Pilot-scale test of a produced water-treatment system for initial removal of organic compounds. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA (2008).
16. Brookes A, Immersed membrane bioreactors for produced water treatment. PhD thesis, Cranfield University School of Water Sciences, UK (2005).
17. Kose B, Ozgun H, Ersahin ME, Dizge N, Koseoglu-Imer DY, Atay B, Kaya R, Altinbas M, Sayili S, Hoshan P, Atay D, Eren E, Kinaci C and Koyuncu I, Performance evaluation of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of brackish oil and natural gas field produced water. Desalination 285:295-300 (2012).
18. Erdem S, Ozgun H, Ersahin ME, Atay B, Kose B, Eliduzgun S, Yilmaz F, Altinbas M, Sayili S, Hoshan P, Atay D, Eren E, Kinaci C and Koyuncu I, Treatment of produced water generated from gas Production fields by microfiltration and nanofiltration/ reverse osmosis membranes, in IWA Regional Conference and Exhibition on Membrane Technology and Water Reuse, ed by Koyuncu I, Yildiz S, Altinbas M, Ozgun H, Ersahin ME, Dereli K and Ozcan O. Istanbul, Turkey, pp 1058-1061 (2010).
19. st edn. American Public Health Association, USA (2005).
20. Kayaalp N, Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Koyuncu I and Kinaci C, A new approach for chemical oxygen demand (COD) measurement at high salinity and low organic matter samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:1547-1552 (2010).
21. TS EN ISO 9377-2, Water Quality: Determination of Hydrocarbon Oil Index- Part 2: Method Using Solvent Extraction and Gas Chromatograph. ISO (2000).
22. Liu Y, Xu HL, Yang SF and Tay JH, Mechanisms and models for anaerobic granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Water Res 37:661-673 (2003).
23. Meng F, Liao B, Liang S, Yang F, Zhang H and Song L, Morphological visualization, componential characterization and microbiological identification of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). J Membrane Sci 361:1-14 (2010).
24. Yu SL, Zhao FB, Zhang XH, Jing GL and Zhen XH, Effect of components in activated sludge liquor on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. J Environ Sci 18:897-902 (2006).
25. Lin HJ, Xie K, Mahendran B, Bagley DM, Leung KT, Liss SN and Liao BQ, Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Res 43:3827-3837 (2009).