메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 589-596

Comparing 2 methods of assessing 30-day readmissions: What is the impact on hospital profiling in the veterans health administration?

Author keywords

hospital quality; public reporting; quality assessment; readmissions; Veterans Affairs (U.S.)

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEART FAILURE; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERFORMANCE; PNEUMONIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNISHMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; VETERANS HEALTH;

EID: 84879885350     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829019a4     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (27)

References (25)
  • 2
    • 84879884484 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • VA Hospital Compare website. 2011, Accessed November 15 2012
    • Veterans Health Administration (VHA). VA Hospital Compare website. 2011. Available at: http://www.hospitalcompare.va.gov/. Accessed November 15, 2012.
    • Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
  • 3
    • 80054881110 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hospital readmissions and the Affordable Care Act: Paying for coordinated quality care
    • Kocher RP, Adashi EY. Hospital readmissions and the Affordable Care Act: paying for coordinated quality care. JAMA. 2011;306: 1794-1795
    • JAMA , vol.2011 , Issue.306 , pp. 1794-1795
    • Kocher, R.P.1    Adashi, E.Y.2
  • 5
    • 84879888515 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publicly reporting riskstandardized, 30-day readmission measures for AMI, HF and PN 2012 Accessed November 15 2012
    • Quality Net. Readmission Measures Overview. Publicly reporting riskstandardized, 30-day readmission measures for AMI, HF and PN 2012. Available at: http://www.qualitynet.org/dcs/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename= QnetPublic%2FPage%2FQnetTier2&cid=1219069855273. Accessed November 15, 2012
    • Quality Net Readmission Measures Overview
  • 6
    • 79955132796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: A systematic review
    • van Walraven C, Bennett C, Jennings A, et al. Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review. CMAJ 2011;183: E391-E402
    • (2011) CMAJ , vol.183
    • Van Walraven, C.1    Bennett, C.2    Jennings, A.3
  • 15
    • 84879881977 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MA Division of Health Care Finance and Policy
    • Nordahl K Potentially Preventable Readmissions, MA Division of Health Care Finance and Policy 2009. Available at: http://www. mahealthdata.org/ resources/Documents/05B-Nordahl.pdf
    • (2009) Potentially Preventable Readmissions
    • Nordahl, K.1
  • 16
    • 84879885626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New York State Medicaid Program Accessed January 10 2013
    • Patterson W, Lindsey M. Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations: New York State Medicaid Program, 2009. Available at: http://www.health. ny.gov/health-care/managed-care/reports/statistics-data/6potentially-avoidable- hospitalizations.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2013
    • (2009) Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations
    • Patterson, W.1    Lindsey, M.2
  • 18
    • 84879879502 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed November 15 2012
    • New York State Health Regulations 2011. Available at: http://www.health. ny.gov/regulations/recently-adopted/docs/2011-02-23-potentially-preventable- readmissions.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2012
    • (2011) New York State Health Regulations
  • 20
    • 84879879077 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • VIReC Research User Guides 2011 Accessed November 15 2012
    • VA Information Resource Center (VIREC). VIReC Research User Guides 2011. Available at: http://www.virec.research.va.gov/RUGs/RUGs-Index.htm. Accessed November 15, 2012
    • VA Information Resource Center (VIREC)
  • 21
    • 84879880051 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed September 14 2012
    • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission 2012. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/06222012-MedPACFY2013IPPS-COMMENT. pdf. Accessed September 14, 2012
    • (2012) Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
  • 22
    • 84879889855 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs) Version 20.0 Methodology Overview
    • M Health Information System Documentation Department. All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs) Version 20.0 Methodology Overview 2003
    • (2003) M Health Information System Documentation Department
  • 23
    • 84879884273 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Potentially Preventable Readmissions Classification System: Methodology Overview
    • 3M Health Information System Documentation Department. Potentially Preventable Readmissions Classification System: Methodology Overview 2008
    • (2008) M Health Information System Documentation Department
  • 25
    • 84879879335 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Florida Health Finder, Methodology for Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPRs) and APR-DRGs: Statistical Methods. 2012. Accessed January
    • Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA). Florida Health Finder, Methodology for Potentially Preventable Readmissions (PPRs) and APR-DRGs: Statistical Methods. 2012. Available at: http://www. floridahealthfinder.gov/Researchers/Reference/Methodology/Methodology. aspx#hreadmit. Accessed January 10, 2013. Development Service
    • (2013) Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) , vol.10


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.