The significance of habitat continuity and current management on the compositional and functional diversity of grasslands in the uplands of Lower Saxony, Germany

Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants

Volumn 208, Issue 5-6, 2013, Pages 299-311

  Krause, Benjamin ^a   Culmsee, Heike ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b German Federal Foundation for the Environment   (Germany)

Author keywords

Community composition; Historical and current management; Land use intensification; Mesotrophic meadows; Pollination; Semi natural grasslands

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MEADOW; MESOTROPHIC ENVIRONMENT; PLANT COMMUNITY; POLLINATION; SHEEP;

GERMANY; LOWER SAXONY;

HEXAPODA; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84879838398     PISSN: 03672530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aavik T., Jõgar Ü., Liira J., Tulva I., Zobel M. Plant diversity in a calcareous wooded meadow-the significance of management continuity. J. Veget. Sci. 2008, 19:475-484.
2. Adriaens D., Honnay O., Hermy M. No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 133:212-224.
3. Aguilar R., Ashworth L., Galetto L., Aizen M.A. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:968-980.
4. Anderson E., et al. LAPACK Users' Guide 1999, SIAM, Philadelphia, (11 authors). 3rd ed.
5. Bahr A., Ellström M., Schnoor T.K., Påhlsson L., Olsson P.A. Long-term changes in vegetation and soil chemistry in a calcareous and sandy semi-natural grassland. Flora 2012, 207:379-387.
6. Bakker J.P., Berendse F. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:63-68.
7. Becker T., Voss N., Durka W. Pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in an 'old rare' bumblebee-pollinated grassland herb. Plant Biol. 2011, 13:857-864.
8. Beyer H.L. Hawth's analysis tools for ArcGIS 2004, http://www.spatialecology.com/htools.
9. Biesmeijer J.C., et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 2006, 313:351-354. (11 authors).
10. Blomqvist M.M., Tamis W.L.M., de Snoo G.R. No improvement of plant biodiversity in ditch banks after a decade of agri-environment schemes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2009, 10:368-378.
11. Bobbink R., Hornung M., Roelofs J.G.M. The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J. Ecol. 1998, 86:717-738.
12. Bobbink R., et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:30-59. (17 authors).
13. Boess J., Gehrt E., Müller U., Ostmann U., Sbresny J., Seininger A. Erläuterungsheft zur digitalen nutzungsdifferenzierten Bodenkundlichen Übersichtskarte 1:50,000 (BÜK 50) von Niedersachsen. Arbeitshefte Boden 2004, 3:1-61.
14. Bornkamm R. Fifty years vegetation development of a xerothermic calcareous grassland in Central Europe after heavy disturbance. Flora 2006, 201:249-267.
15. Borcard D., Legendre P. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol. Modell. 2002, 153:51-68.
16. Borcard D., Legendre P., Drapeau P. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 1992, 73:1045-1055.
17. Chytrý M., Otýpková Z. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling in European vegetation. J. Veget. Sci. 2003, 14:563-570.
18. Cousins S.A.O. Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:2752-2758.
19. Cousins S.A.O., Lindborg R. Remnant grassland habitats as source communities for plant diversification in agricultural landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:233-240.
20. Cousins S.A.O., Vanhoenacker D. Detection of extinction dept depends on scale and specialization. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:782-787.
21. Dauber J., et al. Effects of patch size and density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: a pan-European approach. J. Ecol. 2010, 98:188-196. (17 authors).
22. de Snoo G.R., Naus N., Verhulst J., van Ruijven J., Schaffers A.P. Long-term changes in plant diversity of grasslands under agricultural and conservation management. Appl. Veget. Sci. 2012, 15:299-306.
23. Dierschke H., Briemle G. Kulturgrasland: Wiesen, Weiden und verwandte Staudenfluren 2002, Ulmer, Stuttgart.
24. Donath T.W., Bissels S., Hölzel N., Otte A. Large scale application of diaspore transfer with plant material in restoration practice-impact of seed and microsite limitation. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 138:224-234.
25. Ellenberg H., Leuschner C. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen 2010, Ulmer, Stuttgart. 6th ed.
26. Ellenberg H., Weber E.H., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr. Geobot. 2001, 18:1-262.
27. Flohre A., et al. Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:1772-1781. (23 authors).
28. Flynn D.F.B., et al. Loss of functional diversity under land-use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:22-33. (9 authors).
29. Fründ J., Linsenmair K.E., Blüthgen N. Pollinator diversity and specialization in relation to flower diversity. Oikos 2010, 119:1581-1590.
30. Gustavsson E., Lennartsson T., Emanuelsson M. Land use more than 200 years ago explains current grassland plant diversity in a Swedish agricultural landscape. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 138:47-59.
31. Halada L., Evans D., Romão C., Petersen J.E. Which habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20:2365-2378.
32. Hegg O., Feller U., Dahler W., Scherrer C. Long-term effects of fertilization in a Nardetum. Phytosociology of the pasture and nutrient contents of leaves. Vegetation 1992, 103:151-158.
33. Henle K., et al. Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe-a review. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 124:60-71. (13 authors).
34. Hietel E., Waldhardt R., Otte A. Linking socio-economic factors, environment and land cover in the German Highlands, 1945-1999. J. Environ. Manage. 2005, 75:133-143.
35. Hill M.O., Carey P.D. Prediction of yield in the Rothamsted park grass experiment by Ellenberg indicator values. J. Veget. Sci. 1997, 8:579-586.
36. Hill M.O., Šmilauer P. TWINSPAN for Windows Version 2.3 2005, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology/University of South Bohemia, Huntingdon/České Budějovice. http://www.ceh.ac.uk/products/software/wintwins.html.
37. Hodgson J.G., Grime J.P., Wilson P.J., Thompson K., Band S.R. The impacts of agricultural change (1963-2003) on the grassland flora of Central England: processes and prospects. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6:107-118.
38. Isselstein J. Erhaltung und Förderung der Pflanzenartenvielfalt auf dem Grünland aus landwirtschaftlicher Sicht. Nova Acta Leopold. 2003, 87:99-111.
39. Jacquemyn H., Brys R., Hermy M. Short-term effects of different management regimes on the response of calcareous grassland vegetation to increased nitrogen. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 111:137-147.
40. Jäger E.J., Werner K. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band 2005, vol. 4. Elsevier, München. 10th ed.
41. Kleijn D., et al. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:903-909. (14 authors).
42. Kleijn D., Rundlöf M., Scheper J., Smith H.G., Tscharntke T. Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:474-481.
43. BIOLFLOR-Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Schriftenr. Veget.kde 2002, 38. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn.
44. Köhler B., Ryser P., Güsewell S., Gigon A. Nutrient availability and limitation in traditionally mown and in abandoned limestone grasslands: a bioassay experiment. Plant Soil 2001, 230:323-332.
45. Krause B., Culmsee H., Wesche K., Bergmeier E., Leuschner C. Habitat loss of floodplain meadows in north Germany since the 1950. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20:2347-2364.
46. Krauss J., et al. Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:597-605. (17 authors).
47. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology 2006, Elvesier, Amsterdam.
48. Lunt I.D., Spooner P.G. Using historical ecology to understand patterns of biodiversity in fragmented agricultural landscapes. J. Biogeogr. 2005, 32:1859-1873.
49. McCune B., Keon D. Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. J. Veget. Sci. 2002, 13:603-606.
50. Nagel U., Ritzkowski S., Schunke E. Geologisches und orohydrographisches Blockbild der Umgebung von Dransfeld (bei Göttingen) 1981, vol. 114:1-79. Veröff. niedersächs. Inst. f. Landeskde. Landesentwickl. Univ., Göttingen.
51. Öster M., Ask K., Cousins S.A.O., Eriksson O. Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:1266-1274.
52. PAN, IFAB, INL Umsetzung des High Nature Value Farmland-Indikators in Deutschland-Ergebnisse eines Forschungsvorhabens (UFOPLAN FKZ 3508 89 0400) im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz München, Mannheim und Singen 2011.
53. Paracchini M.L., Petersen J.E., Hoogeveen Y., Bamps C., Burfield I., van Swaay C. High Nature Value Farmland in Europe. An Estimate of the Distribution Patterns on the basis of Land Cover and Biodiversity Data 2008, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports EUR 23480 EN.
54. Peppler-Lisbach C. Predictive modelling of historical and recent land-use patterns. Phytocoenologia 2003, 33:565-590.
55. Poschlod P., Bakker J.P., Kahmen S. Changing land use and its impact on biodiversity. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6:93-98.
56. Pywell R.F., Bullock J.M., Hopkins A., Walker K.J., Sparks T.H., Burke M.J.W., Peel S. Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002, 39:294-309.
57. Pywell R.F., Meek W.R., Loxton R.G., Nowakowski M., Carvell C., Woodcock B.A. Ecological restoration on farmland can drive beneficial functional responses in plant and invertebrate communities. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 140:62-67.
58. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/.
59. Rodwell J.S., Morgan V., Jefferson R.G., Moss D. The European context of British lowland grasslands. JNCC Rep. 2007, 394:1-148.
60. Schaffers A.P., Sykora K.V. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction, a comparison with field measurements. J. Veget. Sci. 2000, 11:225-244.
61. Schmiede R., Ruprecht E., Eckstein R.L., Otte A., Donath T.W. Establishment of rare flood meadow species by plant material transfer: experimental tests of threshold amounts and the effect of sowing position. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 159:222-229.
62. Sponagel H., et al. Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung 2005, Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, (9 authors).
63. Stevens C., et al. Addressing the impact of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on western European grasslands. Environ. Manage. 2011, 48:885-894. (15 authors).
64. Strijker D. Marginal lands in Europe-causes of decline. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6:99-106.
65. Sullivan C.A., Skeffington M.S., Gormally M.J., Finn J.A. The ecological status of grasslands on lowland farmlands in western Ireland and implications for grassland classification and nature value assessment. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:1529-1539.
66. ter Braak C.J.F., Šmilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide. Software for Canocical Community Ordination (Version 4.5) 2002, Biometris, Wageningen/České Budějovice.
67. Tscharntke T., Klein A.M., Kruess A., Steffan-Dewenter I., Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:857-874.
68. Vandewalle M., et al. Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land-use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2921-2947. (19 authors).
69. von Drachenfels O. Kartierschlüssel für Biotoptypen in Niedersachsen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der gesetzlich geschützten Biotope sowie der Lebensraumtypen von Anhang I der FFH-Richtlinie. Naturschutz Landschaftspflege in Niedersachsen A/4 2011, Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Ökologie, Hildesheim.
70. Waesch G., Becker T. Plant diversity differs between young and old mesic meadows in a central European low mountain region. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129:457-464.
71. Walker K.J., Stevens P.A., Stevens D.P., Mountford J.O., Manchester S.J., Pywell R.F. The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 119:1-18.
72. Weiner C.N., Werner M., Linsenmair K.E., Blüthgen N. Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialisation in flower visitor networks. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2011, 12:292-299.
73. Wellstein C., Otte A., Waldhardt R. Impact of site and management on the diversity of central European mesic grassland. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 122:203-210.
74. Wesche K., Krause B., Culmsee H., Leuschner C. Fifty years of change in Central European grassland vegetation. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 150:76-85.
75. Wessels S., Eichberg C., Storm C., Schwabe A. Do plant-community-based grazing regimes lead to epizoochorous dispersal of high proportions of target species?. Flora 2008, 203:304-326.
76. Wessels-de Wit S., Schwabe A. The fate of sheep-dispersed seeds: plant species emergence and spatial patterns. Flora 2010, 205:656-665.