On the exposure of hemispherical photographs in forests

IForest

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 228-237

  Beckschäfer, Philip ^a   Seidel, Dominik ^a   Kleinn, Christoph ^a   Xu, Jianchu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Canopy openness; Canopy photography; Gap fraction; LAI

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879833005     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0957-006     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adamek M, Corre M, Hölscher D (2009). Early effect of elevated nitrogen input on aboveground net primary production of a lower montane rain forest, Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25: 637-647. doi: 10.1017/S026646 7409990253.
2. Bao Y, Cao C, Zhang H, Chen E, He Q, Huang H, Li Z, Li X, Gong P (2008). Synchronous estimation of DTM and fractional vegetation cover in forested area from airborne LIDAR height and intensity data. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences 51: 176-187. doi: 10.1007/ s11431-008-6018-x
3. Beaudet M, Messier C (2002). Variation in canopy openness and light transmission following selection cutting in northern hardwood stands: an assessment based on hemispherical photographs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 110: 217-228. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00289-1.
4. Bolibok L (2010). Equipment and photo exposure in hemispherical photography in forest research. Forest Research Papers 71: 105-115.
5. Buddenbaum H, Seeling S (2008). Characterization of forest stands using full waveform laser scanner and airborne hyperspectral data. In: Proceedings of "SilviLaser 2008: 8th International Conference on LiDAR Applications in Forest Assessment and Inventory" (Hill R, Rosette J, Suárez J eds). Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh (UK) 17-19. September 2008, pp. 377-383.
6. Canon (2012). About EOS 60D. [online] URL: http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_60d#Specifications
7. Cescatti A (2007). Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs: methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 143: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.04.009.
8. Chen J, Black T, Adams R (1991). Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 56: 129-143. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90108-3.
9. Clark J, Murphy G (2011). Estimating forest biomass components with hemispherical photography for Douglas-fir stands in northwest Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 1060-1074. doi: 10.1139/x11-013.
10. Clark N, Lee S, Araman P (2003). Finding a good segmentation strategy for tree crown transparency estimation. In: Proceedings of the "19th Biennial Workshop on Color Photography, Videography and Airborne Imaging for Resource Assessment". Logan (Utah-USA) October 6-8th 2003. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, USA, pp. 10.
11. Clearwater M, Nifinluri T, van Gardingen P (1999). Forest fire smoke and a test of hemispherical photography for predicting understorey light in Bornean tropical rain forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 97: 129-139. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00058-1.
12. Danson F, Hetherington D, Morsdorf F, Koetz B, Allgower B (2007). Forest canopy gap fraction from terrestrial laser scanning. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters IEEE 4: 157-160. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2006.887064.
13. Davi H, Baret F, Huc R, Dufrêne E (2009). Effect of thinning on LAI variance in heterogeneous forests. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 890-899. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.047.
14. Di Carlo J, Wandell B (2000). Rendering high dynamic range images. In: Proceedings of the "SPIE-Sensors and Camera Systems for Scientific, Industrial, and Digital Photography Applications" (Blouke MM, Sampat N, Williams GM, Yeh T eds). San Jose (CA-USA) 22. Jan 2000, pp. 392-401. doi: 10.1117/12.385456.
15. Duveiller G, Defourny P (2010). Batch processing of hemispherical photography using object-based image analysis to derive canopy biophysical variables. In: Proceedings of the "GEOBIA 2010: Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis" (Addink EA, Van Coillie FMB). Ghent University (Ghent-Belgium) 29. June-2. July 2010., ISPRS Vol 38-4/C7. [online] URL: http://geobia.ugent.be/proceedings/
16. Englund S, O'Brien J, Clark D (2000). Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1999-2005. doi: 10.1139/x00-116.
17. Frazer G, Canham C, Lertzman K (1999). Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies. Millbrook, New York, USA.
18. Frazer G, Fournier R, Trofymow J, Hall R (2001). A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 109: 249-263. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00274-X
19. Guevara-Escobar A, Tellez J, Gonzalez-Sosa E (2005). Use of digital photography for analysis of canopy closure. Agroforestry Systems 65: 175-185. doi: 10.1007/s10457-005-0504-y
20. Hale S, Edwards C (2002). Comparison of film and digital hemispherical photography across a wide range of canopy densities. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 112: 51-56. doi: 10.1016/ S0168-1923(02)00042-4.
21. Hanssen K, Solberg S (2007). Assessment of defoliation during a pine sawfly outbreak: calibration of airborne laser scanning data with hemispherical photography. Forest Ecology and Management 250: 9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.005.
22. Hardy J, Melloh R, Koenig G, Marks D, Winstral A, Pomeroy J, Link T (2004). Solar radiation transmission through conifer canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 126: 257-270. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.06.012.
23. Hu L, Gong Z, Li J, Zhu J (2009). Estimation of canopy gap size and gap shape using a hemispherical photograph. Trees-Structure and Function 23: 1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00468-009-0353-9.
24. Inoue A, Yamamoto K, Mizoue N, Kawahara Y (2002). Estimation of relative illuminance using digital hemispherical photography. Journal of Forest Planning 8: 67-70.
25. Inoue A, Yamamoto K, Mizoue N, Kawahara Y (2004a). Calibrating view angle and lens distortion of the Nikon fish-eye converter fc-e8. Journal of Forest Research 9: 177-181. doi: 10.1007/s10310-003-0073-8.
26. Inoue A, Yamamoto K, Mizoue N, Kawahara Y (2004b). Effects of image quality, size and camera type on forest light environment estimates using digital hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 126: 89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.06.002.
27. Inoue A, Yamamoto K, Mizoue N (2011). Comparison of automatic and interactive thresholding of hemispherical photography. Journal of Forest Science 57: 78-87.
28. Ishida M (2004). A application software for automatic calculation of diffuse transmittance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 2208-2216. doi: 10.1139/x04-103.
29. Jarcuska B, Kucbel S, Jaloviar P (2010). Comparison of output results from two programmes for hemispherical image analysis: Gap Light Analyser and Winscanopy. Journal of Forest Science 56: 147-153.
30. Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P, Weiss M, Baret F (2004). Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination: Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 121: 19-35. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08. 027.
31. Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P (2005). Assessment of automatic gap fraction estimation of forests from digital hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 132: 96-114. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.06.003.
32. Kato S, Komiyama A (2000). A calibration method for adjusting hemispherical photographs to appropriate black-and-white images. Journal of Forest Research 5: 109-111. doi: 10.1007/BF02762529.
33. Khabba S, Duchemin B, Hadria R, Ezzahar J, Chehbouni A, Lahrouni A, Hanich L (2009). Evaluation of digital hemispherical photography and plant canopy analyser for measuring vegetation area index of orange orchards. Journal of Agronomy 8: 67-72. doi: 10.3923/ja.2009.67.72.
34. Kidd C, Chapman L (2012). Derivation of skyview factors from LIDAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 33: 3640-3652. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.635163.
35. Kimmins J (2005). Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable forest management and environmental ethics in forestry. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA.
36. Leblanc S, Chen J, Fernandes R, Deering D, Conley A (2005). Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 129: 187-207. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.09.006.
37. Lovell J, Jupp D, Culvenor D, Coops N (2003). Using airborne and groundbased ranging LIDAR to measure canopy structure in Australian forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29: 607-622. doi: 10.5589/m03-026.
38. Macfarlane C (2011). Classification method of mixed pixels does not affect canopy metrics from digital images of forest overstorey. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151: 833-840. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.01.019.
39. Macfarlane C, Coote M, White D, Adams M (2000). Photographic exposure affects indirect estimation of leaf area in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus labill. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 100: 155-168. doi: 10.1016/ S0168-1923(99)00139-2.
40. Macfarlane C, Hoffman M, Eamus D, Kerp N, Higginson S, McMurtrie R, Adams M (2007). Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 143: 176-188. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.10.013.
41. Mengesha T, Kooistra L, Zurita-Milla R, De Bruin S, Schaepman M (2005). Methodology comparison of quantitative LAI retrieval using imaging spectroscopy and geo-spatial interpolation in a softwood forest. In: Proceedings of the "4th Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy" (Zagajewski B, Sobczak M, Prochnicki W eds). EARSeL, Warsaw, Poland, vol. 1, pp. 141.
42. Mertens T, Kautz J, van Reeth F (2009). Exposure fusion: a simple and practical alternative to high dynamic range photography. Computer Graphics Forum 28: 161-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01171.x
43. Morsdorf F, Kötz B, Meier E, Itten K, Allgöwer B (2006). Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote Sensing of Environment 104: 50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.019.
44. NIKON (2012). What is the difference between spot, center-weighted and matrix metering? [online] URL: http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/13774/kw/metering
45. Nobis M, Hunziker U (2005). Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 128: 243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.10.002.
46. Ogilvy T (2004). Regeneration ecology of broadleaved trees in Caledonian Forest. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
47. Pekin B, Macfarlane C (2009). Measurement of crown cover and leaf area index using digital cover photography and its application to remote sensing. Remote Sensing 1: 1298-1320. doi: 10.3390/rs1041298.
48. Promis A, Schindler D, Reif A, Cruz G (2009). Solar radiation transmission in and around canopy gaps in an uneven-aged Nothofagus betuloides forest. International Journal of Biometeorology 53: 355-367. doi: 10.1007/s00484-009-0222-7.
49. Promis A, Gärtner S, Butler-Manning D, Durán-Rangel C, Reif A, Cruz G, Hernández, L (2011). Comparison of four different programs for the analysis of hemispherical photographs using parameters of canopy structure and solar radiation transmittance. Waldökologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz 11: 19-33.
50. Pueschel P, Buddenbaum H, Hill J (2012). An efficient approach to standardizing the processing of hemispherical images for the estimation of forest structural attributes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 160: 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.02.007.
51. R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
52. Ramos F, Santos F (2006). Microclimate of Atlantic forest fragments: regional and local scale heterogeneity. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 49: 935-944. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132006000700011.
53. Reinhard E, Ward G, Pattanaik S, Debevec P, Heidrich W, Myszkowski K (2010). High dynamic range imaging: acquisition, display, and image-based lighting. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Graphics, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
54. Rhoads A, Hamburg S, Fahey T, Siccama T, Kobe R (2004). Comparing direct and indirect methods of assessing canopy structure in a northern hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 584-591. doi: 10.1139/x03-231.
55. Rianno D, Valladares F, Condes S, Chuvieco E (2004). Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (LIDAR) in two contrasting forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 124: 269-275. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.02.005.
56. Rich P (1989). A manual for analysis of hemispherical canopy photography. Technical Report, Los Alamos National Lab., NM, USA.
57. Rich P (1990). Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. Remote Sensing Reviews 5: 13-29. doi: 10.1080/0275725900953 2119.
58. Richardson J, Moskal L, Kim S (2009). Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149: 1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.007.
59. Robertson M, Borman S, Stevenson R (1999). Dynamic range improvement through multiple exposures. In: Proceedings of the "International Conference on Image Processing". Kobe (Japan) 24-28. Oct 1999. ICIP 99, IEEE, pp. 159-163.
60. Rossini M, Panigada C, Meroni M, Colombo R (2006). Assessment of Oak forest condition based on leaf biochemical variables and chlorophyll fluorescence. Tree Physiology 26: 1487-1496. doi: 10.1093/treephys/26.11.1487.
61. Schwalbe E, Maas H, Kenter M, Wagner S (2009). Hemispheric image modeling and analysis techniques for solar radiation determination in forest ecosystems. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 75: 375-384.
62. Seidel D, Fleck S, Leuschner C (2012). Analyzing forest canopies with ground-based laser scanning: a comparison with hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 154: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.006.
63. Sklyar O, Huber W, Smith M (2007). EBImage: image processing and image analysis toolkit for R. R package version 2.
64. Stohr A, Bilhimer D (2008). Standard operating procedures for hemispherical digital photography field surveys conducted as part of a temperature total maximum daily load (TMDL) or forests and fish unit technical study Version 2.0. Environmental Assessment Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Seattle, WA, USA.
65. Tagle G, Jimenez Perez J, Himmelsbach W (2011). Impact of firewood extraction on leaf area index and canopy openness in mixed Pine-Oak forests in northeast Mexico. Forstarchiv 82: 20-25.
66. Thomas V, Noland T, Treitz P, McCaughey J (2011). Leaf area and clumping indices for a boreal mixed-wood forest: LIDAR, hyperspectral, and Landsat models. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32: 8271-8297. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.533211.
67. Unwin D (1980). Microclimate measurement for ecologists. Academic Press Inc., New York, USA.
68. Van Gardingen P, Jackson G, Hernandez-Daumas S, Russell G, Sharp L (1999). Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 94: 243-257. doi: 10.1016/ S0168-1923(99)00018-0.
69. Van Pelt R, Franklin J (2000a). Influence of canopy structure on the understory environment in tall, old-growth, conifer forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1231-1245. doi: 10.1139/x00-050.
70. Van Pelt R, Franklin J (2000b). Influence of canopy structure on the understory environment in tall, old-growth, conifer forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1231-1245. doi: 10.1139/x00-050.
71. Von Arx A, Huber S, Kneubühler M, Itten K (2007). Leaf area index estimates obtained for mixed forest using hemispherical photography and hymap data. In: Proceedings of the "ISPRS Working Group VII/1. Workshop ISPMSRS'07: Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing" (Schaepman M, Shunlin L, Groot N, Kneubhler M eds). Davos, Switzerland.
72. Wagner S, Hagemeier M (2006). Method of segmentation affects leaf inclination angle estimation in hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139: 12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.05.008.
73. Wagner S (1994). Strahlungsschätzung in Wäldern durch hemisphärische Fotos. Methode und Anwendung. Ph.D. thesis. Universität Göttingen. Göttingen, Germany.
74. Wagner S (1998). Calibration of grey values of hemispherical photographs for image analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 90: 103-117. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00073-7.
75. Wagner S (2001). Relative radiance measurements and zenith angle dependent segmentation in hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 107: 103-115. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00232-X
76. Weiss M, Baret F (2010). CAN-EYE V6. 1. User Manual. INRA, Avignon, France.
77. Weiss S (2006). Mapping topoclimate and microclimate in the Monarch butterfly biosphere reserve, Mexico. In: Proceedings of the "AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts" San Francisco (CA-USA) 11-15. Dec 2006, pp. 1.
78. Weiss M, Baret F, Smith G, Jonckheere I, Coppin P (2004). Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 121: 37-53. doi: 10.1016/ j.agrformet.2003.08.001.
79. Yamamoto K, Kobayashi K, Nonoda T, Inoue A, Mizoue N (2010). Effect of settings of digital fisheye photography to estimate relative illuminance within forest under low light conditions. Journal of Forest Research 15: 283-288. doi: 10.1007/s10310-010-0189-6.
80. Zhang Y, Chen J, Miller J (2005). Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 133: 166-181. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.09.009.
81. Zhao F, Yang X, Schull M, Román-Colón M, Yao T, Wang Z, Zhang Q, Jupp D, Lovell J, Culvenor D (2011). Measuring effective leaf area index, foliage profile, and stand height in New England forest stands using a full-waveform groundbased LIDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment 115: 2954-2964. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.030.
82. Zou C, Royer P, Breshears D (2010). Density-dependent shading patterns by Sonoran saguaros. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 156-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.07.001