Landslide susceptibility analysis using probabilistic likelihood ratio model-a geospatial-based study

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 429-440

  Sujatha, E Ramani ^a   Rajamanickam, Victor ^a   Kumaravel, P ^a   Saranathan, E ^a  

^a SASTRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Arcmap; Geospatial; GIS environment; Landslide; South India

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; GIS; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSLIDE; PROBABILITY;

INDIA; KODAIKANAL; TAMIL NADU;

EID: 84879795252     PISSN: 18667511     EISSN: 18667538     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-011-0356-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary, review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58(1): 21-44.
2. Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32: 269-277.
3. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1/2): 15-31.
4. Bai S, Lü G, Wang J, Zhou P, Ding L (2010) GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-010-0509-3.
5. Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY (2005) Susceptibility assessments of shallow earth flows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 72: 250-271.
6. Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65: 1389-1399.
7. Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42: 213-228.
8. Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C et al (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51: 241-256.
9. ER. Sujatha and Rajamanickam V (2011) Landslide susceptibility mapping of Tevankarai Ar Sub-Watershed, Kodaikkanal Taluk, India, using weighted similar choice fuzzy model natural hazards. doi: 10. 1007/S11069-011-9763-2.
10. Ercanoglu M (2005) Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea region, Turkey) by artificial neural networks. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5: 979-992.
11. Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66: 327-343.
12. Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T (2005) The March 17, 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol 81(1): 65-83.
13. Gokeceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analysis and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44(1-4): 147-161.
14. Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural network in Jabonosa River basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78: 11-27.
15. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multiscale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31: 181-216.
16. Lee S, Evangelista DG (2006) Earthquake-induced landslide-susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6: 687-695.
17. Lee S, Pradhan B (2006) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4: 33-41.
18. Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50(6): 847-855.
19. Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47: 982-990.
20. Magliulo P, Di Lisio A, Russo F, Zelano A (2008) Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics: a case study in southern Italy. Nat Hazards 47: 411-435.
21. Naranjo JL, van Western CJ, Soeters R (1994) Evaluating the use of training areas in bivariate statistical landslide hazard analysis: a case study in Colombia. J Inst Aerosp Surv Earth Sci 1994-3: 292-300.
22. Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir AS, Duman TY (2010) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Math Probl Eng. doi: 10. 1155/2010/901095.
23. Pachauri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes. Eng Geol 32: 81-100.
24. Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. Int J Phys Sci 3(11): 1-15.
25. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci. 60(5): 1037-1054.
26. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2009) Use of geospatial data for the development of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide hazard mapping: a case study in Malaysia. Appl Geomatics 1: 3-15.
27. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010) A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Comput Environ Urban 34: 216-235.
28. Shou KJ, Wang CF (2003) Analysis of the Chiufengershan landslide triggered by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Eng Geol 68: 237-250.
29. Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45: 665-679.
30. Vijith H, Madhu G (2008) Estimating potential landslide sites of an upland sub-watershed in Western Ghat's of Kerala (India) through frequency ratio and GIS. Environ Geol 55(7): 1397-1405.
31. Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci. 61(4): 821-836.