Three-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of global and regional function in patients with recent myocardial infarction: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

Echocardiography

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 682-692

  Thorstensen, Anders ^a,b   Hala, Pavel ^a,c   Kiss, Gabriel ^d   D'Hooge, Jan ^a,e   Torp, Hans ^a   Støylen, Asbjørn ^a,b   Amundsen, Brage ^a,b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c Levanger Hospital   (Norway)

^d NA HOMOLCE HOSPITAL   (Czech Republic)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

coronary artery disease; myocardial contrast enhancement; myocardial infarction; strain; three dimensional echocardiography; wall motion score

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE WALL MOTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STRAIN; THREE-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; WALL-MOTION SCORE;

CAUSALITY; COMORBIDITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NORWAY; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84879788045     PISSN: 07422822     EISSN: 15408175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12115     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Burns RJ, Gibbons RJ, Yi Q, et al. The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 30-36.
2. Wu E, Ortiz JT, Tejedor P, et al. Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study. Heart 2008; 94: 730-736.
3. Bello D, Einhorn A, Kaushal R, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: infarct size is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 29: 50-56.
4. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445-1453.
5. Miller TD, Christian TF, Hodge DO, et al. Comparison of acute myocardial infarct size to two-year mortality in patients <65 to those >=65 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1170-1175.
6. Amundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 789-793.
7. Stanton T, Leano R, Marwick TH,: Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain / clinical perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 356-364.
8. Stoylen A, Heimdal A, Bjornstad K, et al. Strain rate imaging by ultrasound in the diagnosis of regional dysfunction of the left ventricle. Echocardiography 1999; 16: 321-329.
9. Stoylen A, Heimdal A, Bjornstad K, et al. Strain rate imaging by ultrasonography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 1053-1064.
10. Villanueva-Fernandez E, Ruiz-Ortiz M, Mesa-Rubio D, et al. Feasibility of bidimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for strain analysis in consecutive patients in daily clinical practice. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 923-926.
11. Urbano-Moral JA, Patel AR, Maron MS, et al. Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: methodological aspects and clinical potential. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 997-1010.
12. Dalen H, Thorstensen A, Aase SA, et al. Segmental and global longitudinal strain and strain rate based on echocardiography of 1266 healthy individuals: the HUNT study in Norway. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 176-183.
13. Heiberg E, Engblom H, Engvall J, et al. Semi-automatic quantification of myocardial infarction from delayed contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Scand Cardiovasc J 2005; 39: 267-275.
14. Eek C, Grenne B, Brunvand H, et al. Strain echocardiography and wall motion score index predicts final infarct size in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 187-194.
15. Gjesdal O, Helle-Valle T, Hopp E, et al. Noninvasive separation of large, medium, and small myocardial infarcts in survivors of reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comprehensive tissue Doppler and speckle-tracking echocardiography study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1: 189-196, 182 p following 196.
16. Meng X-l, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB,: Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull 1992; 111: 172-175.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ,: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843.
18. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105: 539-542.
19. Reant P, Barbot L, Touche C, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular systolic function using three-dimensional echocardiography speckle-tracking strain parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25: 68-79.
20. Mistry N, Beitnes JO, Halvorsen S, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function in ST-elevation myocardial infarction by global longitudinal strain: a comparison with ejection fraction, infarct size, and wall motion score index measured by non-invasive imaging modalities. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 678-683.
21. Sjoli B, Orn S, Grenne B, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular global strain as determinants of infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 1232-1238.
22. Bello D, Fieno DS, Kim RJ, et al. Infarct morphology identifies patients with substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1104-1108.
23. Grenne B, Eek C, Sjoli B, et al. Acute coronary occlusion in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: outcome and early identification by strain echocardiography. Heart 2010; 96: 1550-1556.
24. Flett AS, Hasleton J, Cook C, et al. Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 150-156.