Visual task solution strategies in tree diagrams

IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 169-176

  Burch, Michael ^a   Andrienko, Gennady ^b   Andrienko, Natalia ^b   Höferlin, Markus ^a   Raschke, Michael ^a   Weiskopf, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER IAIS   (Germany)

Author keywords

H.5.m Information Systems : Information Interfaces and Presentation Miscellaneous

Indexed keywords

COMPLETION TIME; EYE MOVEMENT DATUM; INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATIONS; SOLUTION STRATEGY; SPATIO-TEMPORAL; SPATIO-TEMPORAL STRUCTURES; TASK DIFFICULTY; VISUAL ANALYTICS;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FORESTRY;

VISUALIZATION;

FORESTRY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; VISION;

EID: 84879775581     PISSN: 21658765     EISSN: 21658773     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PacificVis.2013.6596142     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. G. Andrienko and N. Andrienko. Poster: Dynamic time transformation for interpreting clusters of trajectories with space-time cube. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pages 213-214, 2010.
2. G. Andrienko, N. Andrienko, M. Burch, and D. Weiskopf. Visual analytics methodology for eye movement studies. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2889-2898, 2012.
3. N. V. Andrienko and G. L. Andrienko. Spatial generalization and aggregation of massive movement data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(2):205-219, 2011.
4. A. Aula, P. Majaranta, and K.-J. Räihä. Eye-tracking reveals the personal styles for search result evaluation. In Proc. INTERACT, pages 1058-1061, 2005.
5. C. Bennett, J. Ryall, L. Spalteholz, and A. Gooch. The aesthetics of graph visualization. In Proc. Computational Aesthetics, pages 57-64, 2007.
6. A. Bojko. Informative or misleading? Heatmaps deconstructed. In Proc. HCI, pages 30-39, 2009.
7. M. Burch, F. Bott, F. Beck, and S. Diehl. Cartesian vs. radial - A comparative evaluation of two visualization tools. In Proc. International Symposium on Visual Computing, pages 151-160, 2008.
8. M. Burch, N. Konevtsova, J. Heinrich, M. Höferlin, and D. Weiskopf. Evaluation of traditional, orthogonal, and radial tree diagrams by an eye tracking study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2440-2448, 2011.
9. C. Chen and Y. Yu. Empirical studies of information visualization: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(5):851-866, 2000.
10. W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. An experiment in graphical perception. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25(5):491-501, 1986.
11. A. Cöltekin, S. Fabrikant, and M. Lacayo. Exploring the efficiency of users' visual analytics strategies based on sequence analysis of eye movement recordings. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(10):1559-1575, 2010.
12. G. di Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I. G. Tollis. Graph Drawing: Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs. Prentice Hall, 1998.
13. A. T. Duchowski, J. Driver, S. Jolaoso, W. Tan, B. N. Ramey, and A. Robbins. Scanpath comparison revisited. In Proc. ETRA, pages 219-226, 2010.
14. P. Eades. Drawing free trees. Bulletin of the Institute for Combinatorics and its Applications, 5:10-36, 1992.
15. J. H. Goldberg and J. Helfman. Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: Reading values on linear versus radial graphs. Information Visualization, 10(3):182-195, 2011.
16. J. H. Goldberg and J. I. Helfman. Comparing information graphics: A critical look at eye tracking. In Proc. BELIV, pages 71-78, 2010.
17. J. H. Goldberg and X. P. Kotval. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6):631-645, 1999.
18. W. Huang. Using eye tracking to investigate graph layout effects. In Proc. Asia-Pacific Symposium on Visualization, pages 97-100, 2007.
19. W. Huang, P. Eades, and S.-H. Hong. A graph reading behavior: Geodesic-path tendency. In Proc. IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, pages 137-144, 2009.
20. C. Körner. Eye movements reveal distinct search and reasoning processes in comprehension of complex graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25:893-905, 2011.
21. C. C. Lin and H. C. Yen. On balloon drawings of rooted trees. Graph Algorithms and Applications, 11(2):431-452, 2007.
22. M. McGuffin and J. Robert. Quantifying the space-efficiency of 2D graphical representations of trees. Information Visualization, 9(2):115-140, 2009.
23. C. Plaisant. The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In Proc. Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 109-116, 2004.
24. M. Pohl, M. Schmitt, and S. Diehl. Comparing the readability of graph layouts using eyetracking and task-oriented analysis. In Proc. Computational Aesthetics, pages 49-56, 2009.
25. V. Ponsoda, D. Scott, and J. Findlay. A probability vector and transition matrix analysis of eye movements during visual search. Acta Psychologica, 88(2):167-185, 1995.
26. A. Poole and L. J. Ball. Eye tracking in HCI and usability research. In C. Ghaoui, editor, Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, pages 211-219. Idea Group Reference, 2006.
27. C. M. Privitera and L. W. Stark. Algorithms for defining visual regions-of-interest: Comparison with eye fixations. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(9):970-982, 2000.
28. M. Raschke, X. Chen, and T. Ertl. Parallel scan-path visualization. In Proc. ETRA, pages 165-168, 2012.
29. H.-J. Schulz. Treevis.net: A tree visualization reference. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 31(6):11-15, 2011.
30. M. Tory and T. Möller. Human factors in visualization research. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 10(1):72-84, 2004.
31. H. Y. Tsang, M. Tory, and C. Swindells. eSeeTrack - Visualizing sequential fixation patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):953-962, 2010.