Using personality to adjust diversity in recommender systems

HT 2013 - Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 225-229

  Wu, Wen ^a,b   Chen, Li ^b,c   He, Liang ^a  

^a EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c BNU HKBU UNITED INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE   (China)

Author keywords

Diversity; Personality based recommender systems; User evaluation

Indexed keywords

BIG FIVE; DIVERSITY; EFFECTIVE SOLUTION; FACTOR MODEL; MODERATING FACTORS; PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS; USER EVALUATIONS; USER SURVEYS;

HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84879752062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2481492.2481521     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Adomavicius, G. and Kwon, Y. 2011. Maximizing aggregate recommendation diversity: a graph-theoretic approach. In Proc of RecSys'11 Intl. Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems (DiveRS'11), ACM, 3-10.
2. Adomavicius, G and Tuzhilin, A. 2005. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., 17, 6, 734-749.
3. Chen, L., Wu, W., and He, L. 2013. How personality influences users' needs for recommendation diversity. In Proc. CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM.
4. Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M, and Wind, Y. 2001. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 31 (3), Part 2 of 2, May June 2001, S56-S73.
5. Gunawardana, A. and Shani, G. 2010. Evaluating recommendation systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Ricci, Rokach, Shpira, Kantor (Eds.), 1-41.
6. Hellriegel, D and Wlldman, R. 2000. Organizational Behavior (Eleventh Edition), Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College pub.
7. Hellriegel, D and Wlldman, R. 2000. Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition), Authorized Translation/Adaptation of the edition by Thomson Learning and East China Normal University Press.
8. rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2009), ACM, 221-224.
9. Hu, R. and Pu, P. 2011. Enhancing collaborative filtering systems with personality information. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2011), ACM, 197-204.
10. Hurley, N. and Zhang, M. 2011. Novelty and diversity in top-n recommendation - analysis and evaluation. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10 (4), Article 14, 1-30.
11. John A. Johnson. 2009. Descriptions used in ipip-neo narrative report. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIPNEOdescriptions.html, June 2009.
12. McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., and Konstan, J.A. 2006. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In Proc. CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1097-1101.
13. th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 2001), D.W. Aha and I. Watson Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 347-361.
14. th Workshop on Emotion in HumanComputer Interaction Real World Challenges, 30-37.
15. th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2005), ACM, 22-32.