Aspects of insider threats

Advances in Information Security

Volumn 49, Issue , 2010, Pages 1-15

  Probst, Christian W ^a   Hunker, Jeffrey ^b   Gollmann, Dieter ^c   Bishop, Matt ^d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b Jeffrey Hunker   (United States)

^c HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879725658     PISSN: 15682633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7133-3_1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Binney v. Banner Therapy Products, 631 S.E. 2d 848, 850. North Carolina Court of Appeals (2006)
2. Bishop, M.: The Insider Problem Revisited. In: Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop 2005. ACM Press, Lake Arrowhead, CA, USA (2005)
3. Bishop, M., Engle, S., Peisert, S., Whalen, T., Gates, C.: Case studies of an insider framework. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (2009)
4. Brackney, R.C., Anderson, R.H.: Understanding the insider threat: proceedings of a March 2004 workshop. RAND, Santa Monica, CA: (2004)
5. Cappelli, D.M., Moore, A.P., Shaw, E.D.: A Risk Mitigation Model: Lessons Learned From Actual Insider Sabotage. In: Computer Security Institute, 33rd Annual Computer Security Conference and Exhibition (2006)
6. Carlson, A.: The unifying policy hierarchy model. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis (2006)
7. Cha, A.E.: Even spies embrace china's free market. Washington Post, February 15, 2008. Available from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/14/AR2008021403550.html, last visited March 2010.
8. Hawley, C.: The liechtenstein connection-massive tax evasion scandal in germany. Spiegel Online International, 18 February 2008. Available from http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,535768,00.html, last visited March 13, 2009.
9. Homepage of Dagstuhl Seminar 08302: "Countering Insider Threats. " Available from http://www.dagstuhl.de/08302, last visited December 4, 2008 (2008)
10. Keating, D.: Tax suspects guidance on software left d.c. at risk. Washington Post (2008)
11. Kirk, J.: Homeland security e-mail server turns into spam cannon. InfoWorld. com, October 4, 2007. Available from http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/homeland-security-e-mail-server-turns-spam-cannon-924, last visited March 2010.
12. Patzakis, J.: New incident response best practices: Patch and proceed is no longer acceptable incident response procedure. White Paper, Guidance Software, Pasadena, CA (2003)
13. Pfleeger, S.L., Stolfo, S.J.: Addressing the insider threat. IEEE Security and Privacy 7, 10-13 (2009). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MSP.2009.146
14. Predd, J., Pfleeger, S.L., Hunker, J., Bulford, C.: Insiders behaving badly. IEEE Security and Privacy 6, 66-70 (2008). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MSP.2008.87
15. Schwartz, N.D., Bennhold, K.: A trader's secrets, a bank's missteps. New York Times, 5 February 2009, New York, USA.
16. Probst, C.W., Hunker, J.: The Risk of Risk Analysis-And its relation to the Economics of Insider Threats, Proc. of the Eighth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2009), June 2009.