Visualizing motion data in virtual reality: Understanding the roles of animation, interaction, and static presentation

Computer Graphics Forum

Volumn 31, Issue 3 PART 3, 2012, Pages 1215-1224

  Coffey, D ^a   Korsakov, F ^a   Ewert, M ^a   Hagh Shenas, H ^a   Thorson, L ^a,b   Ellingson, A ^a   Nuckley, D ^a   Keefe, D F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Minneapolis College of Art and Design   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; TAXONOMIES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTS; INTERACTIVE CONTROL; INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL REALITY; MOTION VISUALIZATION; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS; QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK; QUANTITATIVE RESULT; TEMPORAL DIMENSIONS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84879722425     PISSN: 01677055     EISSN: 14678659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03114.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. [BBG-10] BRAINERD E. L., BAIER D. B., GATESY S. M., HEDRICK T. L., METZGER K. A., GILBERT S. L., CRISCO J. J.: Xray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 313A, 5 (June 2010), 262-279. 1
2. [BWC01] BARTRAM L., WARE C., CALVERT T.: Filtering and integrating visual information with motion, 2001. 2
3. [DAA-07] DELP S., ANDERSON F., ARNOLD A., LOAN P., HABIB A., JOHN C., GUENDELMAN E., THELEN D.: Opensim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 54, 11 (nov. 2007), 1940 -1950. 8
4. [ESBN11] ELLINGSON A., SCHULZ C., BRONFOR G., NUCKLEY D.: Helical Axis Approach to Aberrant Motion Identification in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain. In American Socitey of Biomechanics 2011 Annual Meeting (2011). 8
5. [IFP97] INTERRANTE V., FUCHS H., PIZER S. M.: Conveying the 3D shape of smoothly curving transparent surfaces via texture. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 3, 2 (1997), 98-117. 2
6. [IRA06] INTERRANTE V., RIES B., ANDERSON L.: Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited. In Virtual Reality Conference, 2006 (Mar. 2006), pp. 3-10. 2
7. [JC09] JIAN CHEN., DANIEL K., RISKIN K. S. B. S. M. S. D. H. L.: Bookstein coordinate-based shape analysis of bat wing kinematics. In Integrative and Comparative Biology (2009), vol. 49, pp. E30-E30. 1
8. [JR05] JOSHI A., RHEINGANS P.: Illustration-Inspired Techniques for Visualizing Time-Varying Data, 2005. 3
9. [KERC09] KEEFE D. F., EWERT M., RIBARSKY W., CHANG R.: Interactive coordinated multiple-view visualization of biomechanical motion data. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 15, 6 (2009), 1383-90. 1, 3, 4
10. [KOB-08] KEEFE D. F., O'BRIEN T. M., BAIER D. B., GATESY S. M., BRAINERD E. L., LAIDLAW D. H.: Exploratory Visualization of Animal Kinematics Using Instantaneous Helical Axes. Computer Graphics Forum 27, 3 (May 2008), 863-870. 1, 3, 4
11. [MGL07] MARAI G. E., GRIMM C., LAIDLAW D. H.: Arthrodial joint markerless cross-parameterization and biomechanical visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 5 (September 2007), 1095-1104. 1, 3, 4
12. [RFF-08] ROBERTSON G., FERNANDEZ R., FISHER D., LEE B., STASKO J.: Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6 (Nov. 2008), 1325-1332. 2, 6
13. [Ros06] ROSLING H.: TED Talks: Hans Rosling Shows The Best Stats You've Ever Seen, Feb. 2006. 2
14. [SBHW10] STEINICKE F., BRUDER G., HINRICHS K., WILLEMSEN P.: Change blindness phenomena for stereoscopic projection systems. In Virtual Reality Conference (VR), 2010 IEEE (Mar. 2010), pp. 187-194. 2
15. [SSBG10] SCHMID J., SUMNER R. W., BOWLES H., GROSS M.: Programmable motion effects. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 papers on - SIGGRAPH '10 (Los Angeles, California, 2010), p. 1. 3
16. [STI09] SANDO T., TORY M., IRANI P.: Effects of animation, user-controlled interactions, and multiple static views in understanding 3D structures. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization - APGV '09 (New York, New York, USA, 2009), ACM Press, p. 69. 2, 5, 6, 9
17. [SWB02] SEKULER R., WATAMANIUK S. N. J., BLAKE R.: Perception of visual motion. Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 1 (2002). 2
18. [TKAO06] TORY M., KIRKPATRICK A. E., ATKINS M. S., OTHERS: Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2006), 2-13. 3
19. [TMB02] TVERSKY B., MORRISON J., BETRANCOURT M.: Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 57, 4 (2002), 247-262. 2
20. [War01] WARE C.: Designing with a 2 1/2-D attitude. Information Design Journal 10, 3 (2001), 258-265. 2
21. [WM08] WARE C., MITCHELL P.: Visualizing graphs in three dimensions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 5 (Jan. 2008), 2:1-2:15. 2
22. [WS03] WOODRING J., SHEN H.: Chronovolumes: a direct rendering technique for visualizing time-varying data. In Proceedings of the 2003 Eurographics/IEEE TVCG Workshop on Volume graphics (2003), ACM, pp. 27-34. 3