The construction of hallucination: History and epistemology

Hallucinations: Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 55-71

  Berrios, German E ^a   Marková, Ivana S ^b  

^a ROBINSON COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879703576     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0959-5_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Aleman, A., Larøi, F. (2008). Hallucinations. The science of idiosyncratic perception. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Allport, F.H. (1955). Theories of perception. New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Armstrong, D.M. (1961). Perception and the physical world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Bernheimer, R. (1961). The nature of representation. New York, NY: New York University Press.
5. Berrios, G.E. (1982). Tactile Hallucinations. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 45, 285-293.
6. Berrios, G.E. (1988). Historical background to abnormal psychology. In Adult abnormal psychology. Edited by E. Miller and P. Cooper. London: Churchill Livingstone, pp. 26-51
7. Berrios, G.E. (1990). Introduction to Tamburini's A theory of hallucinations. Classic text No 1.
8. History of Psychiatry, 1, 145-156.
9. Berrios, G.E. (1990a). Musical hallucinations: a historical and clinical study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 188-194.
10. Berrios, G.E. (1996). The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Berrios, G.E., Freeman, H. (1991). 150 years of British psychiatry. Volume 1. London: Gaskell.
12. Berrios, G.E., Dening, T. (1996). Pseudohallucinations: A conceptual history. Psychological Medicine, 26, 753-763.
13. Berrios, G.E., Marková, I.S. (2002). Conceptual issues. In Biological Psychiatry. Edited by H. D'haenen, J.A. den Boer, and P. Willner. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 9-39.
14. Berrios, G.E., Marková, I.S. (2006). Symptoms-historical perspectives and effect on diagnosis. In Psychosomatic Medicine. Edited by M. Blumenfi eld and J.J. Strain. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 27-38.
15. Boissier de Sauvages (1772). Nosologie méthodique. Tome 7. Lyon: Bruyset, pp. 43-190.
16. Carterette, E.C., Friedman, M.P., eds. (1974). Handbook of perception. Volume 1: Historical and philosophical roots of perception. New York, NY: Academic Press.
17. Clapin, H., ed. (2002). Philosophy of mental representation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Cummins, R. (1989). Meaning and mental representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Dicker, G. (1980). Perceptual knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.
20. Duparc, F. (1992). Nouveaux développements sur l'hallucination négative et la représentation. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 61, 101-121.
21. Esquirol, E. (1817). Hallucinations. In Dictionnaire des Sciences Médicales, par une Société de Médecins et de Chirurgiens. Paris: Panckoucke, pp. 64-71.
22. Ey, H. (1935). La discussion de 1855 à la Société Médico-Psychologique sur l'hallucination et l'état actuel du problème de l'activité hallucinatoire. Annales Médico-psychologiques, 93, 584-612.