Influence of elevation modelling on hydrodynamic simulations of a tidally- dominated estuary

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 497, Issue , 2013, Pages 152-164

  Falcão, Ana Paula ^a,b   Mazzolari, Andrea ^a   Gonçalves, Alexandre B ^a,b   Araújo, Maria Amélia V C ^a   Trigo Teixeira, António ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Digital elevation model resolution; High resolution geoid undulation model; Hydrodynamic simulation in estuary; Satellite positioning; Spatial interpolation; Wet and dry

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; GEOID UNDULATION; HYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATION; SATELLITE POSITIONING; SPATIAL INTERPOLATION; WET AND DRY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIGITAL INSTRUMENTS; ESTUARIES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLOODS; FORESTRY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTERPOLATION; WATER LEVELS;

SURVEYING;

BATHYMETRY; DATA SET; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ELEVATION; ESTUARINE DYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTERPOLATION; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING; WATER LEVEL;

LIMIA ESTUARY; PORTUGAL; VIANA DO CASTELO [PORTUGAL];

EID: 84879701393     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.045     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aguilar F.J., Aguilar M.A., Agüera F., Sánchez J. The accuracy of grid digital elevation models linearly constructed from scattered sample data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20(2):169-192.
2. Ali A., Zhang H., Lemckert C.J. Numerical of hydrodynamics of a very shallow estuarine systems - Coombabah Lake, Gold Coast, Australia. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 2009, 56:922-926.
3. Araújo M.A.V.C., Mazzolari A., Trigo-Teixeira A. Wave set-up in the modeling of storm surge at Viana do Castelo (Portugal). Journal of Coastal Research 2011, 64:971-975.
4. Blain, C.A., Rogers, W.E., 1998. Coastal tide prediction using the ADCIRC-2DDI hydrodynamic finite element model: model validation and sensitivity analyses in the southern North Sea/English Channel. Technical report NRL/FR/7322-98-9682, Naval Research Laboratory Oceanography Division, Stennis Space Center, MS, 96p.
5. Blain C.A., Westerink J.J., Luettich R.A. The influence of domain size on the response characteristics of a hurricane storm surge model. Journal of Geophysical Research 1994, 99:18467-18479.
6. Blain, C.A., Linzell, R.S., Chu, P., Massey, C., 2010. Validation test report for the Advanced CIRCulation Model (ADCIRC) v45.11. NRL Memorandum Rep NRL/MR/7320-10-9205 Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.
7. Buttner O. The influence of topographic and mesh resolution in 2D hydrodynamic modelling for floodplains and urban areas. Geophysical Research Abstracts 2007, 9:08232.
8. Cea L., French J.R. Bathymetric error estimation for the calibration and validation of estuarine hydrodynamic models. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2012, 100:124-132.
9. Chaplot V., Darboux F., Bourreannane H., Leguedois S., Silveira N., Phachomphon K. Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density. Geomorphology 2006, 77:126-141.
10. Cobby D.M., Mason D.C., Horritt M.S., Bates P.D. Two-dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite-element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes 2003, 17:1979-2000.
11. Cook A., Merwade V. Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modelling approach on flood inundation mapping. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 377:131-142.
12. Coveney S., Stewart Fotheringham A. The impact of DEM data source on prediction of flooding and erosion risk due to sea-level rise. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2011, 25(7):1191-1211.
13. Dietrich J.C., Zijlema M., Westerink J.J., Holthuijsen L.H., Dawson C., Luettich R.A., Jensen R.E., Smith J.M., Stelling G.S., Stone G.W. Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations. Coastal Engineering 2011, 58(1):45-65.
14. DiGruttolo N., Mohamed A. Emerging unmanned aerial remote sending system for intertidal zone modelling: a low-cost method of collecting remote sensing data for modelling short-term effects of sea level rise, Part II: Close-range airborne remote sensing. Surveying and Land Information Science 2011, 70(3):119-129.
15. Falcão, A.P., Matos, J., Casaca, J., Sousa, A.J., Gonçalves, A., 2008. Preliminary results of spatial modelling of GPS/levelling heights: a local quasi-geoid/geoid for the Lisbon area. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation, Chania, Crete, Greece, 2008.
16. Feyen, J., Hess, K., Spargo, E., Wong, A., White, S., Sellars, J., Gill, S., 2006. Development of a continuous bathymetric/topographic unstructured coastal flooding model to study sea level rise in North Carolina. In: Spaulding M. et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Estuarine and Coastal Modeling, ASCE.
17. Fortunato A.B., Oliveira A., Baptista A.M. On the effect of tidal flats on the hydrodynamics of the Tagus Estuary. Oceanologica Acta 1999, 22(1):31-44.
18. Fotopoulos G. Calibration of geoid error models via a combined adjustment of ellipsoidal, orthometric and gravimetric geoid height data. Journal of Geodesy 2005, 79:111-123.
19. French J.R. Critical perspectives on the evaluation and optimization of complex numerical models of estuary hydrodynamics and sediment dynamics. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2010, 35:174-189.
20. Guo Q., Li W., Yu H., Alvarez O. Effects of topographic variability and Lidar sampling density on several DEM interpolation methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2010, 76(6):701-712.
21. Hardy R.J., Bates P.D., Anderson M.G. The importance of spatial resolution in hydraulic models for floodplain environments. Journal of Hydrology 1999, 216:124-136.
22. Horritt M.S., Bates P.D., Mattinson M.J. Effects of mesh resolution and topographic representation in 2D finite volume models of shallow water fluvial flow. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 329:306-314.
23. Instituto Hidrográfico, n/d. Webpage of Instituto Hidrográfico (Portuguese Hydrographic Institute) (accessed 07.12). http://www.hidrografico.pt.
24. Jones J.E., Davies A.M. On the sensitivity of computed higher tidal harmonics to mesh size in a finite element model. Continental Shelf Research 2007, 27:1908-1927.
25. Le Provost C., Vincent P. Some tests of precision for a finite element model of ocean tides. Journal of Computational Physics 1986, 65:273-291.
26. Le Provost C., Lyard F., Molines J., Genco M., Rabilloud F. A hydrodynamic ocean tide model improved by assimilating a satellite altimeter derived data set. Journal of Geophysical Research 1998, 103:5513-5529.
27. Legleiter C.J., Kyriakidis P.C. Spatial prediction of river channel topography by kriging. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2008, 33:841-867.
28. Long, B., 2005. Étude hydrodynamique, sédimentologique et biologique des sites de Maria, Saint-Siméon, Bonaventure, Newport et Cap-d'Espoir dans la baie des Chaleurs, Québec, Canada. Rapport INRS-ETE pour le Ministère des Transports du Québec, 179p.
29. Luettich, R.A., Westerink, J.J., 1999. Elemental wetting and drying in the ADCIRC hydrodynamic model: Upgrades and documentation for ADCIRC version 34.XX. Contractors Rep, US Army Corps of Engineers.
30. Luettich, R.A., Westerink, J.J., 2004. Formulation and numerical implementation of the 2D/3D ADCIRC finite element model, version 44.XX. (accessed 02.10.11). http://adcirc.org/adcirc_theory_2004_12_08.pdf.
31. Luettich, R.A., Westerink, J.J., Scheffner, N.W., 1992. ADCIRC: an advanced three-dimensional circulation model for shelves, coasts and estuaries, Report 1: Theory and methodology of ADCIRC-2DDI and ADCIRC-3DL. Tech Rep DRP-92-6, US Army Corps of Engineers.
32. Mazzolari, A., Trigo-Teixeira, A., Araújo, M.A.V.C., 2012. Two dimensional unstructured mesh generation for shallow water models based on the multi-criteria strategy. Actas das II Jornadas de Engenharia Hidrográfica. Lisbon, Portugal.
33. McInnes K., Macadam I., Hubbert G., O'Grady J. A modelling approach for estimating the frequency of sea level extremes and the impact of climate change in southeast Australia. Natural Hazards 2009, 51:115-137.
34. Merwade V. Effect of spatial trends on interpolation of river bathymetry. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 371:169-181.
35. Merwade V., Maidment D., Goff J. Anisotropic considerations while interpolating river channel bathymetry. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 331:731-741.
36. Merwade V., Cook A., Coonrod J. GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environmental Modelling and Software 2008, 23:1300-1311.
37. Merwade V., Oliveira F., Arabi M., Edleman S. Uncertainty in flood inundation mapping: currents issues and future directions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2008, 7:608-620.
38. Nahavandchi H., Soltanpour A. Improved determination of heights using a conversion surface by combining gravimetric quasi-geoid and GPS-levelling differences. Studia Geophysica and Geodaetica 2006, 50(2):165-180.
39. Omer C.R., Nelson E.J., Zundel A.K. Impact of varied data resolution on hydraulic modeling and floodplain delineation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2003, 39(2):467-475.
40. Pe'eri S., Long B. LIDAR technology applied in coastal studies and management. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 2011, 62:1-5.
41. Pinho J.L.S., Vieira J.M.P. Mathematical modelling of salt water intrusion in a northern Portuguese estuary. IAHS Publication 2007, 310:277-290.
42. Poulter B., Halpin P.N. Raster modelling of coastal flooding from sea-level rise. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2008, 22(2):167-182.
43. Qiong, W., Guodong, Y., 2011. Geoid refinement of Songyuan irrigation area based on EGM2008 and GPS. International Conference Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC 2011), 2666-2669.
44. Raber G.T., Jensen J.R., Hodgson M.E., Tullis J.A., Davis B.A., Berglund J. Impact of Lidar nominal post-spacing on DEM accuracy and flood zone delineation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2007, 73(7):793-804.
45. Rebordão I., Trigo-Teixeira A. Tidal propagation in the Lima Estuary. Journal of Coastal Research SI 2009, 56:1400-1404.
46. Reguzzoni M., Sansó F., Venuti G. The theory of general kriging, with applications to the determination of a local geoid. Geophysical Journal International 2005, 162(2):303-314.
47. Smith W., Sandwell D. Global seafloor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science 1997, 277:1957-1962.
48. Sutherland J., Walstra D.J.R., Chesher T.J., van Rijn L.C., Southgate H.N. Evaluation of coastal area modelling systems at an estuary mouth. Coastal Engineering 2004, 51:119-142.
49. Wackernagel H. Multivariate Geostatistics 2003, Springer, Berlin. third ed.
50. Weaver R.J., Slinn D.N. Influence of bathymetric fluctuations on coastal storm surge. Coastal Engineering 2010, 57:62-70.
51. Westerink J.J., Luettich R.A., Feyen J.C., Atkinson J.H., Dawson C., Roberts H.J., Powell M.D., Dunion J.P., Kubatko E.J., Pourtaheri H. A basin- to channel-scale unstructured grid hurricane storm surge model applied toSouthern Louisiana. Monthly Weather Review 2008, 136(3):833-864.
52. Yamano S. The use of multi-temporal satellite images to estimate intertidal reef-flat topography. Journal of Spatial Science 2007, 52:73-79.
53. Zaletnyik P., Völgyesi L., Kirchnet I., Paláncz B. Combination of GPS/leveling and the gravimetric geoid by using the thin plate spline interpolation technique via finite element method. Journal of Applied Geodesy 2007, 1:233-239.