Erratum: Power and phase properties of oscillatory neural responses in the presence of background activity (J Comput Neurosci, 10.1007/s10827-012-0424-6);Power and phase properties of oscillatory neural responses in the presence of background activity

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 337-343

  Ding, Nai ^a   Simon, Jonathan Z ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrainment; Neural oscillations; Phase coherence; Phase resetting

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NEURONS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SYNCHRONIZATION;

ENTRAINMENT; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIALS; NEURAL ACTIVITY; NEURAL OSCILLATIONS; NEURAL RESPONSE; PHASE COHERENCE; PHASE PROPERTIES; PHASE RESETTING; PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; POWER;

MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEURAL ACTIVITY; NEURAL OSCILLATION; PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

EID: 84879692582     PISSN: 09295313     EISSN: 15736873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-013-0439-7     Document Type: Erratum

References (16)

1. Ding, N., & Simon, J. Z. (2012). Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 78-89.
2. Fisher, N. I. (1993). Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
3. Howard, M. F., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 2500-2511.
4. Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
5. Kayser, C., Montemurro, M. A., Logothetis, N. K., & Panzeri, S. (2009). Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns. Neuron, 61, 597-608.
6. Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science, 320, 110-113.
7. Luo, H., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron, 54, 1001-1010.
8. Mallat, S. G. (1999). A wavelet tour of signal processing. San Diego: Academic.
9. Miller, J., & Thomas, J. (1972). Detectors for discrete-time signals in non-Gaussian noise. IEEE Transcations on Information Theory, 18(2), 241-250.
10. Poor, H. V. (1994). An introduction to signal detection and estimation. New York: Springer.
11. Sahani, M., & Linden, J. F. (2003). How linear are auditory cortical responses? In S. Becker, S. Thrun, & K. Obermeyer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 15, pp. 109-116). Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Sauseng, P., Klimesch, W., Gruber, W. R., Hanslmayr, S., Freunbergera, R., & Doppelmayr, M. (2007). Are event-related potential components generated by phase resetting of brain oscillations? A critical discussion. Neuroscience, 146, 1435-1444.
13. Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences, 32, 9-18.
14. Shah, A. S., Bressler, S. L., Knuth, K. H., Ding, M., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2004). Neural dynamics and the fundamental mechanisms of event-related brain potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 476-483.
15. Telenczuk, B., Nikulin, V. V., & Curio, G. (2010). Role of neuronal synchrony in the generation of evoked EEG/MEG responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 3557-3567.
16. Yeung, N., Bogacz, R., Holroyd, C. B., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Detection of synchronized oscillations in the electroencephalogram: an evaluation of methods. Psychophysiology, 41, 822-832.