Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, single-center trial

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 434-439

  Falt, Přemysl ^a   Šmajstrla, Vít ^a   Fojtík, Petr ^a   Liberda, Martin ^a   Kliment, Martin ^a   Tvrdík, Josef ^b   Urban, Ondřej ^a,b  

^a Vitkovicka nemocnice as   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

cap; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; water immersion

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; TRIMECAINE;

ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT; ADULT; AERATION; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CAP ASSISTED WATER IMMERSION COLONOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEUM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGMOID; TRANSVERSE COLON; WATER IMMERSION COLONOSCOPY;

CAP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; WATER IMMERSION;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADENOMA; CECAL NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMMERSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84879685475     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01402.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G, et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 72: 693-700.
2. Radaelli F, Paggi S, Amato A, et al. Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: A randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 72: 701-709.
3. Leung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, et al. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: Randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 557-563.
4. Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, et al. A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 73: 103-110.
5. Pohl J, Messer I, Behrens A, et al. Water infusion for cecal intubation increases patient tolerance, but does not improve intubation of unsedated colonoscopies. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011; 9: 1012-1014.
6. Falt P, Liberda M, Smajstrla V, et al. Combination of water immersion and carbon dioxide insufflation for minimal sedation colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 24: 971-977.
7. Leung FW, Leung JW, Mann SK, et al. The water method significantly enhances patient-centered outcomes in sedated and unsedated colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 816-821.
8. 2 insufflation for colonoscopy. J. Interv. Gastroenterol. 2011; 1: 78-82.
9. Leung FW, Leung JW, Siao-Salera RM, et al. The water method significantly enhances detection of diminutive lesions (adenoma and hyperplastic polyp combined) in the proximal colon in screening colonoscopy-data derived from two RCT in US veterans. J. Interv. Gastroenterol. 2011; 1: 48-52.
10. Leung FW, Harker JO, Leung JW, et al. Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate-review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods. J. Interv. Gastroenterol. 2011; 1: 121-126.
11. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Satane H, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefullness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 75-81.
12. Harada Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, et al. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 69: 637-644.
13. Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ, et al. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 41-46.
14. Shida T, Katsuura Y, Terakoto O, et al. Transparent hood attached to the colonoscope: Does it really work for all types of colonoscopes? Surg. Endosc. 2008; 22: 2654-2658.
15. Dai J, Feng N, Lu H, et al. Transparent cap improves patients' tolerance of colonoscopy and shortens examination time by inexperienced endoscopists. J. Dig. Dis. 2010; 11: 364-368.
16. Hewett DG, Rex DK,. Cap-fitted colonoscopy: A randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 72: 775-781.
17. Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 3905-3910.
18. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kato N, et al. Hood-assisted colonoscopy is more effective in detection of colorectal adenomas than narrow-band imaging. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010; 8: 379-383.
19. Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N, et al. Autofluorescence imaging with a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasm: A prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 72: 1006-1013.
20. Westwood DA, Alexakis N, Conner SJ, et al. Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard adult colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis. Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 218-225.
21. Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VWS, et al. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 739-742.
22. Yague AS, Kaltenbach T, Anglemyer A, et al. To CAP or not to CAP during screening colonoscopy: A meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: Suppl.AB166-167 (Abstract).