Towards a spatial semantics to analyze the visual dynamics of the pedestrian mobility in the urban fabric

Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 237-257

  Leduc, Thomas ^a   Miguet, Francis ^a   Tourre, Vincent ^a,b   Woloszyn, Philippe ^c  

^a CERMA UMR CNRS 1563   (France)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE DE NANTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ RENNES 2   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VISIBILITY; VISION;

INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; PARTIAL VISIBILITY; PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY; SPECIFIC SEMANTICS; SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY; VISIBILITY ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84879623239     PISSN: 18632351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12326-9_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Anguix, A. and Carrion, G. (2005). gvSIG: Open Source Solutions in spatial technologies. In GIS Planet, Estoril, Portugal.
2. Batty M (2001). Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Planning and design: Environment and planning B, 28(1):123-150.
3. Batty M and Jiang B (1999). Multi-agent simulation: new approaches to exploring space-time dynamics in GIS. CASA Working Papers Series, London, UK, (10):25.
4. Benedikt ML (1979). To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6(1):47-65.
5. Benedikt ML and Burnham CA (1985). Perceiving architectural space: From optic arrays to isovists. In Persistence and Change, pages 103-114. edited by WH Warren and RE Shaw. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Couclelis H (1992). People Manipulate Objects (but Cultivate Fields): Beyond the Raster-Vector Debate in GIS. In Frank AU, Campari I, and Formentini U, editors, Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, International Conference GIS - From Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 65-77, Pisa, Italy. Springer.
7. Gibson JJ (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Hillier B and Hanson J (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University press.
9. Leduc, T., Bocher, E., González Cortés, F., and Moreau, G. (2009a). GDMS-R: A mixed SQL to manage raster and vector data. In GIS Ostrava 2009 - Symposium on Seamless Geoinformation Technologies, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
10. th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science - AGILE'2009, Hanover, Germany.
11. Lynch KA (1976). Managing the sense of a region. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Meilinger T, Franz G, and Bülthoff HH (2009). From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps toward closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Advance online publication.
13. Morello E and Ratti C (2009). A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(5):837-853.
14. Peponis J, Wineman J, Rashid M., Hong Kim S, and Bafna S (1997). On the description of shape and spatial configuration inside buildings: convex partitions and their local properties. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(5):761-781.
15. Piombini A (2006). Modélisation des choix d'itinéraires pédestres en milieu urbain approche géographique et paysagère. PhD thesis, Université de Franche-Comté. Ecole Doctorale "langages, espaces, temps, sociétés".
16. Sarradin F, Siret D, Couprie M., and Teller J (2007). Comparing sky shape skeletons for the analysis of visual dynamics along routes. Planning and design: Environment and planning B, 34(5):840-857.
17. Stamps AE (2005). Isovists, enclosure, and permeability theory. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(5):735-762.
18. Tandy CRV (1967). The isovist method of landscape survey. Methods of Landscape Analysis. Ed. H C Murray, Landscape Research Group, PO Box 53, Horspath, Oxford, OX33 1WX.
19. Teller J (2003). A spherical metric for the field-oriented analysis of complex urban open spaces. Planning and design: Environment and planning B, 30(3):339-356.
20. Turner A, Doxa M, O'Sullivan D, and Penn A (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Planning and design: Environment and planning B, 28(1):103-121.
21. th International symposium "Computer Science for environmental protection" of Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), pages 173-186, Bonn, Germany. METROPOLIS Verlag.
22. Woloszyn, P. (2002). From fractal techniques to subjective quantification: towards an urban ambient metric? In Landscape and Architectural Modeling Symposium, pages 1-6, Sousse, Tunisia.
23. Yang PPJ, Putra SY, and Li W (2007). Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Planning and design: Environment and planning B, 34(6):971-992.
24. Zacharias J (2001). Pedestrian behaviour and perception in urban walking environments. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(1):18.