Linking litter decomposition of above- and below-ground organs to plant-soil feedbacks worldwide

Journal of Ecology

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 943-952

  Freschet, Grégoire T ^a   Cornwell, William K ^b   Wardle, David A ^a   Elumeeva, Tatyana G ^c   Liu, Wendan ^d   Jackson, Benjamin G ^a   Onipchenko, Vladimir G ^c   Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A ^b   Tao, Jianping ^d   Cornelissen, Johannes H C ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Decomposition rate (k); Fine root; Leaf; Litter decomposability; Litter input; Plant economics spectrum; Plant functional traits; Plant soil (below ground) interactions; Plant soil feedback; Response effect framework

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECOMPOSITION; FINE ROOT; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; HERB; LEAF LITTER; PLANT COMMUNITY; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; WOODY PLANT;

EID: 84879605495     PISSN: 00220477     EISSN: 13652745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12092     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abiven, S., Recous, S., Reyes, V. & Oliver, R. (2005) Mineralisation of C and N from root, stem and leaf residues in soil and role of their biochemical quality. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 42, 119-128.
2. Aerts, R. (1999) Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50, 29-37.
3. Aerts, R., Bakker, C. & Caluwe, H. (1992) Root turnover as determinant of the cycling of C, N, and P in a dry heathland ecosystem. Biogeochemistry, 15, 175-190.
4. Baraloto, C., Paine, C.E.T., Poorter, L., Beauchene, J., Bonal, D., Domenach, A.M., Hérault, B., Patiño, S., Roggy, J.C. & Chave, J. (2010) Decoupled leaf and stem economics in rain forest trees. Ecology Letters, 13, 1338-1347.
5. Berg, B., Johansson, M.-B., Ekbohm, G., McClaugherty, C., Rutigliano, F. & Santo, A.V.D. (1996) Maximum decomposition limits of forest litter types: a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 74, 659-672.
6. Birouste, M., Kazakou, E., Blanchard, A. & Roumet, C. (2012) Plant traits and decomposition: are the relationships for roots comparable to those for leaves? Annals of Botany, 109, 463-472.
7. Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P.M., Kleinen, T., Wirth, C., Cornwell, W.K., Cornelissen, J.H.C. & Kattge, J. (2012) Plant-driven variation in decomposition rates improves projections of global litter stock distribution. Biogeosciences, 9, 565-576.
8. Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H. & Baumgardner, G.A. (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111, 1-11.
9. Carroll, S.P., Hendry, A.P., Reznick, D.N. & Fox, C.W. (2007) Evolution on ecological time-scales. Functional Ecology, 21, 387-393.
10. Chapin, F.S. III, Vitousek, P.M. & van Cleve, K. (1986) The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. The American Naturalist, 127, 48-58.
11. Cornelissen, J.H.C. (1996) An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. Journal of Ecology, 84, 573-582.
12. Cornelissen, J., Sass-Klaassen, U., Poorter, L., van Geffen, K., van Logtestijn, R., van Hal, J. et al. (2012) Controls on coarse wood decay in temperate tree species: birth of the LOGLIFE experiment. Ambio, 41, 231-245.
13. Cornwell, W.K., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V.T., Godoy, O. et al. (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letters, 11, 1065-1071.
14. Coûteaux, M.-M., Bottner, P. & Berg, B. (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 63-66.
15. Craine, J.M., Lee, W.G., Bond, W.J., Williams, R.J. & Johnson, L.C. (2005) Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses. Ecology, 86, 12-19.
16. Dearden, F.M., Dehlin, H., Wardle, D.A. & Nilsson, M.-C. (2006) Changes in the ratio of twig to foliage in litterfall with species composition, and consequences for decomposition across a long term chronosequence. Oikos, 115, 453-462.
17. Díaz, S., Hodgson, J.G., Thompson, K., Cabido, M., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Jalili, A. et al. (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 295-304.
18. Fierer, N., Craine, J.M., McLauchlan, K. & Schimel, J.P. (2005) Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology, 86, 320-326.
19. Freschet, G.T., Aerts, R. & Cornelissen, J.H.C. (2012a) Multiple mechanisms for trait effects on litter decomposition: moving beyond home-field advantage with a new hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 100, 619-630.
20. Freschet, G.T., Aerts, R. & Cornelissen, J.H.C. (2012b) A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability. Functional Ecology, 26, 56-65.
21. Freschet, G.T., Cornelissen, J.H.C., van Logtestijn, R.S.P. & Aerts, R. (2010a) Evidence of the 'plant economics spectrum' in a subarctic flora. Journal of Ecology, 98, 362-373.
22. Freschet, G.T., Cornelissen, J.H.C., van Logtestijn, R.S.P. & Aerts, R. (2010b) Substantial nutrient resorption from leaves, stems and roots in a sub-arctic flora: what is the link with other resource economics traits? New Phytologist, 186, 879-889.
23. Garnier, E., Cortez, J., Billes, G., Navas, M.-L., Roumet, C., Debussche, M., Laurent, G., Blanchard, A., Aubry, D., Bellmann, A., Neill, C. & Toussaint, J.-P. (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 85, 2630-2637.
24. Gill, R.A. & Jackson, R.B. (2000) Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147, 13-31.
25. Grime, J.P. (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86, 902-910.
26. Grime, J.P. (2001) Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
27. Hansen, K., Vesterdal, L., Schmidt, I.K., Gundersen, P., Sevel, L., Bastrup-Birk, A., Pedersen, L.B. & Bille-Hansen, J. (2009) Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 2133-2144.
28. Harmon, M.E. (2009) Woody detritus mass and its contribution to carbon dynamics of old-growth forests: the temporal context. Old-Growth Forests: Function, Fate and Value (eds C. Wirth, G. Gleixner & M. Heimann), pp. 159-190. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
29. Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J.D. et al. (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15, pp. 133-302. Academic Press, New York.
30. Hättenschwiler, S., Aeschlimann, B., Coûteaux, M.-M., Roy, J. & Bonal, D. (2008) High variation in foliage and leaf litter chemistry among 45 tree species of a neotropical rainforest community. New Phytologist, 179, 165-175.
31. Hobbie, S.E. (1992) Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 336-339.
32. Hobbie, S.E. (1996) Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecological Monographs, 66, 503-522.
33. Hobbie, S.E., Oleksyn, J., Eissenstat, D.M. & Reich, P.B. (2010) Fine root decomposition rates do not mirror those of leaf litter among temperate tree species. Oecologia, 162, 505-513.
34. Jackson, B.G., Peltzer, D.A. & Wardle, D.A. (2013) Are functional traits and litter decomposability coordinated across leaves, twigs, and wood? A test using temperate rainforest tree species. Oikos, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00056.x.
35. Jalota, R.K., Dalal, R.C., Harms, B.P., Page, K., Mathers, N.J. & Wang, W.J. (2006) Effects of litter and fine root composition on their decomposition in a Rhodic Paleustalf under different land uses. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 37, 1859-1875.
36. Kaye, J.P. & Hart, S.C. (1997) Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 139-143.
37. Khiewtam, R.S. & Ramakrishnan, P.S. (1993) Litter and fine root dynamics of a relict sacred grove forest at Cherrapunji in north-eastern India. Forest Ecology and Management, 60, 327-344.
38. Laiho, R. & Prescott, C.E. (1999) The contribution of coarse woody debris to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in three Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 1592-1603.
39. Laiho, R. & Prescott, C.E. (2004) Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 763-777.
40. Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology, 16, 545-556.
41. Liu, W., Fox, J.E.D. & Xu, Z. (2003) Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in a montane moist evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountains, SW China. Plant Ecology, 164, 157-170.
42. Mokany, K., Ash, J. & Roxburgh, S. (2008) Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. Journal of Ecology, 96, 884-893.
43. Nambiar, E.K.S. & Fife, D.N. (1991) Nutrient retranslocation in temperate conifers. Tree Physiology, 9, 185-207.
44. Nordén, B., Ryberg, M., Götmark, F. & Olausson, B. (2004) Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biological Conservation, 117, 1-10.
45. Poorter, H., Niklas, K.J., Reich, P.B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P. & Mommer, L. (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193, 30-50.
46. Prescott, C.E. (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry, 101, 133-149.
47. Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C. & Gurevitch, J. (2000) MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, USA.
48. Ryser, P. & Eek, L. (2000) Consequences of phenotypic plasticity vs. interspecific differences in leaf and root traits for acquisition of above-ground and below-ground resources. American Journal of Botany, 87, 402-411.
49. Schimel, J.P. & Bennett, J. (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology, 85, 591-602.
50. Schimel, J.P. & Hättenschwiler, S. (2007) Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 1428-1436.
51. Schmidt, M.W.I., Torn, M.S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I.A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J. & Manning, D.A.C. (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 478, 49-56.
52. Scurlock, J.M.O., Johnson, K. & Olson, R.J. (2002) Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biology, 8, 736-753.
53. Silver, W. & Miya, R. (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia, 129, 407-419.
54. Suding, K.N., Lavorel, S., Chapin, F.S. III, Cornelissen, J.H.C., Diaz, S., Garnier, E., Goldberg, D., Hooper, D.U., Jackson, S.T. & Navas, M.-L. (2008) Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology, 14, 1125-1140.
55. Sundarapandian, S.M. & Swamy, P.S. (1999) Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 123, 231-244.
56. Sykes, J.M. & Bunce, R.G.H. (1970) Fluctuations in litter-fall in a mixed deciduous woodland over a three-year period 1966-68. Oikos, 21, 326-329.
57. Taylor, B.R., Prescott, C.E., Parsons, W.J.F. & Parkinson, D. (1991) Substrate control of litter decomposition in 4 Rocky-Mountain coniferous forests. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69, 2242-2250.
58. Tjoelker, M.G., Craine, J.M., Wedin, D., Reich, P.B. & Tilman, D. (2005) Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species. New Phytologist, 167, 493-508.
59. Vivanco, L. & Austin, A. (2006) Intrinsic effects of species on leaf litter and root decomposition: a comparison of temperate grasses from North and South America. Oecologia, 150, 97-107.
60. Wall, D.H., Bradford, M.A., St. John, M.G., Trofymow, J.A., Behan-Pelletier, V., Bignell, D.E. et al. (2008) Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent. Global Change Biology, 14, 2661-2677.
61. Wang, H., Liu, S. & Mo, J. (2010) Correlation between leaf litter and fine root decomposition among subtropical tree species. Plant and Soil, 335, 289-298.
62. Wardle, D.A., Barker, G.M., Bonner, K.I. & Nicholson, K.S. (1998) Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? Journal of Ecology, 86, 405-420.
63. Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Klironomos, J.N., Setala, H., van der Putten, W.H. & Wall, D.H. (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 304, 1629-1633.
64. Warton, D.I., Wright, I.J., Falster, D.S. & Westoby, M. (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews, 81, 259-291.
65. Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D.D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F. et al. (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827.
66. Yuan, Z.Y. & Chen, H.Y.H. (2010) Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: literature review and meta-analyses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29, 204-221.