The clinical significance of overt diabetes in pregnancy

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 468-474

  Wong, T ^a,b   Ross, G P ^a   Jalaludin, B B ^c,d   Flack, Jeff R ^a,b  

^a BANKSTOWN LIDCOMBE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c SOUTH WESTERN SYDNEY LOCAL HEALTH DISTRICT   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL OUTCOME; FASTING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN JAUNDICE; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; OVERT DIABETES IN PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL CARE; PUERPERIUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; STILLBIRTH; AUSTRALIA; BLOOD; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; MEDICAL AUDIT; METABOLISM; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BODY MASS INDEX; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FASTING; FEMALE; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; NEW SOUTH WALES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84879593744     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dme.12110     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Position statement. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: S62– 67.
2. Schaefer UM, Songster G, Xiang A, Berkowitz K, Buchanan TA, Kjos SL. Congenital malformations in offspring of women with hyperglycaemia first detected during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1165–1171.
3. Omori Y, Janovic L. Proposal for the reconsideration of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2592–2593.
4. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 676–682.
5. Hoffman L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, Oats JJN, Simmons D. Gestational diabetes mellitus – management guidelines. The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 93–97.
6. WHO/IDF. Definition and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycaemia: Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241594934_eng.pdf Last accessed 1 July 2012.
7. Gardosi J, Francis A. Customised Weight Centile Calculator – GROW-Centile (v5.15: individual; v6.4: bulk centiles). Gestation Network, 2009. Available at http://www.gestation.net Last accessed 10 March 2011.
8. Schaefer-Graf UM, Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL. Clinical predictors for a high risk for development of diabetes mellitus in the early puerperium in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 751–756.
9. Nasrat AA, Johnstone FD, Hasan SAM. Is random plasma glucose an efficient screening test for abnormal glucose tolerance in pregnancy? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 855–860.
10. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census. 2006. Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/Data Last accessed 21 March 2012.
11. Diabetes Australia NSW. Diabetes Atlas. 2008. Available at http://www.diabetesnsw.com.au/DAW2008/atlas.asp Last accessed 18 March 2012.
12. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Diabetes Prevalence in Australia: An Assessment of National Data Sources. October 2009. Available at http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442 468288 Last accessed 18 March 2012.
13. Flack JR, Ross GP, Ho S, McElduff A. Recommended changes to diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: impact on workload. Austr NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 439–443.